Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)A London receptionist refused to wear heels and was dismissed from her job. Now she’s petitioning... [View all]
Source: Washington Post
A London receptionist refused to wear heels and was dismissed from her job. Now shes petitioning Parliament.
By Ben Guarino May 12 at 7:39 AM
When Nicola Thorp showed up at PwC, a finance company in London, late last year, she was wearing flats what she thought were smart, sensible shoes for her first day on the job as a receptionist.
But the 27-year-old temp worker was told by PwC that she would have to put on something a little taller. Specifically, footwear with 2- to 4-inch heels.
Thorp refused, countering shed have to spend the day on her feet. I said I just wont be able to do that in heels, Thorp told BBC Radio London in an interview Wednesday. I said if you can give me a reason as to why wearing flats would impair me to do my job today, then fair enough, but they couldnt.
When she pointed out that men wouldnt be expected to do the same work in heels, she says her new colleagues laughed at her and dismissed her from work without pay.
Portico, the outsourcing company that had hired Thorp for the PwC job, argued she had agreed to a dress code. It later told the BBC that, with immediate effect all our female colleagues can wear plain flat shoes. PcW said that such heels were not a part of its rules, the BBC also reported Wednesday.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
By Ben Guarino May 12 at 7:39 AM
When Nicola Thorp showed up at PwC, a finance company in London, late last year, she was wearing flats what she thought were smart, sensible shoes for her first day on the job as a receptionist.
But the 27-year-old temp worker was told by PwC that she would have to put on something a little taller. Specifically, footwear with 2- to 4-inch heels.
Thorp refused, countering shed have to spend the day on her feet. I said I just wont be able to do that in heels, Thorp told BBC Radio London in an interview Wednesday. I said if you can give me a reason as to why wearing flats would impair me to do my job today, then fair enough, but they couldnt.
When she pointed out that men wouldnt be expected to do the same work in heels, she says her new colleagues laughed at her and dismissed her from work without pay.
Portico, the outsourcing company that had hired Thorp for the PwC job, argued she had agreed to a dress code. It later told the BBC that, with immediate effect all our female colleagues can wear plain flat shoes. PcW said that such heels were not a part of its rules, the BBC also reported Wednesday.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/05/12/temp-receptionist-in-london-refused-to-wear-2-to-4-inch-high-heels-and-was-dismissed-from-her-job-now-shes-petitioning-parliament/
____________________________________________________________
Source: BBC
London receptionist 'sent home for not wearing heels'
11 May 2016 London
A London receptionist was sent home from work after refusing to wear high heels, it has emerged.
Temp worker Nicola Thorp, 27, from Hackney, arrived at finance company PwC to be told she had to wear shoes with a "2in to 4in heel".
When she refused and complained male colleagues were not asked to do the same, she was sent home without pay.
Outsourcing firm Portico said Ms Thorp had "signed the appearance guidelines" but it would now review them.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
11 May 2016 London
A London receptionist was sent home from work after refusing to wear high heels, it has emerged.
Temp worker Nicola Thorp, 27, from Hackney, arrived at finance company PwC to be told she had to wear shoes with a "2in to 4in heel".
When she refused and complained male colleagues were not asked to do the same, she was sent home without pay.
Outsourcing firm Portico said Ms Thorp had "signed the appearance guidelines" but it would now review them.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-36264229
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A London receptionist refused to wear heels and was dismissed from her job. Now she’s petitioning... [View all]
Eugene
May 2016
OP
We men do like to find the smallest oppression possible and pretend it's equivalent.
LanternWaste
May 2016
#93
Wearing a tie may be physically uncomfortable during the duration one wears it
etherealtruth
May 2016
#91
How did your feet feel at the end of your shift? Feet and breasts are two different things.
valerief
May 2016
#78
Yep. Heels are for decoration. They are not meant for standing for hours on end or lots of walking.
kcr
May 2016
#87
LibertarianUnderground--------------------------------------------------------->
MattBaggins
May 2016
#57
Take it as a positive. It's another (your noun here) to put on Ignore. I am. nt
valerief
May 2016
#79
Whenever anyone takes a job they make an agreement. So your argument is stating that one can
cui bono
May 2016
#88
"public-school-boy thing" So men from private schools are not smirking sexists?
yellowcanine
May 2016
#7
The Donald and george W bush are the stereotypical examples in the US. IF the stereotype fits wear
Vincardog
May 2016
#32
Yes, men obviously have far more freedom in corporate dress codes than women
whatthehey
May 2016
#43
High heel regs are rare enough to generate news articles, and fleeting enough
whatthehey
May 2016
#60
Ladies - I am totally baffled by the resurgance of high heels. They were popular when I was younger
jonno99
May 2016
#30
No, I don't blame it on the women. But then again this story is the first I can
jonno99
May 2016
#54
Makes as much sense as anything else. I don't recall Carrie ever "falling off" her heels -
jonno99
May 2016
#72
High heels have never gone away. You might have not been in a high-heels milieu.
WinkyDink
May 2016
#70
Image if I had worn 4 inch heels in my civilian police uniform behind bullet proof glass
Omaha Steve
May 2016
#65
Most women wear them so that they will appear taller...and its about fashion
davidn3600
May 2016
#75
She didn't care about appearing taller, she wanted to be comfortable and without injury.
cui bono
May 2016
#89
She probably didn't wear her push-up bra and low-cut blouse either. Fuckin' assholes. nt
valerief
May 2016
#77