Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

polly7

(20,582 posts)
102. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
Thu May 12, 2016, 05:18 PM
May 2016

Libya Table of Contents

The remaking of Libyan society that Qadhafi envisioned and to which he devoted his energies after the early 1970s formally began in 1973 with a so-called cultural or popular revolution. The revolution was designed to combat bureaucratic inefficiency, lack of public interest and participation in the subnational governmental system, and problems of national political coordination. In an attempt to instill revolutionary fervor into his compatriots and to involve large numbers of them in political affairs, Qadhafi urged them to challenge traditional authority and to take over and run government organs themselves. The instrument for doing this was the "people's committee." Within a few months, such committees were found all across Libya. They were functionally and geographically based and eventually became responsible for local and regional administration.

People's committees were established in such widely divergent organizations as universities, private business firms, government bureaucracies, and the broadcast media. Geographically based committees were formed at the governorate, municipal, and zone (lowest) levels. Seats on the people's committees at the zone level were filled by direct popular election; members so elected could then be selected for service at higher levels. By mid-1973 estimates of the number of people's committees ranged above 2,000.

In the scope of their administrative and regulatory tasks and the method of their members' selection, the people's committees embodied the concept of direct democracy that Qadhafi propounded in the first volume of The Green Book, which appeared in 1976. The same concept lay behind proposals to create a new political structure composed of "people's congresses." The centerpiece of the new system was the General People's Congress (GPC), a national representative body intended to replace the RCC.

The new political order took shape in March 1977 when the GPC, at Qadhafi's behest, adopted the "Declaration of the Establishment of the People's Authority" and proclaimed the Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. The term jamahiriya is difficult to translate, but American scholar Lisa Anderson has suggested "peopledom" or "state of the masses" as a reasonable approximation of Qadhafi's concept that the people should govern themselves free of any constraints, especially those of the modern bureaucratic state. The GPC also adopted resolutions designating Qadhafi as its general secretary and creating the General Secretariat of the GPC, comprising the remaining members of the defunct RCC. It also appointed the General People's Committee, which replaced the Council of Ministers, its members now called secretaries rather than ministers.

All legislative and executive authority was vested in the GPC. This body, however, delegated most of its important authority to its general secretary and General Secretariat and to the General People's Committee. Qadhafi, as general secretary of the GPC, remained the primary decision maker, just as he had been when chairman of the RCC. In turn, all adults had the right and duty to participate in the deliberation of their local Basic People's Congress (BPC), whose decisions were passed up to the GPC for consideration and implementation as national policy. The BPCs were in theory the repository of ultimate political authority and decision making, being the embodiment of what Qadhafi termed direct "people's power." The 1977 declaration and its accompanying resolutions amounted to a fundamental revision of the 1969 constitutional proclamation, especially with respect to the structure and organization of the government at both national and subnational levels.

Continuing to revamp Libya's political and administrative structure, Qadhafi introduced yet another element into the body politic. Beginning in 1977, "revolutionary committees" were organized and assigned the task of "absolute revolutionary supervision of people's power"; that is, they were to guide the people's committees, raise the general level of political consciousness and devotion to revolutionary ideals, and guard against deviation and opposition in the BPCs. Filled with politically astute zealots, the ubiquitous revolutionary committees in 1979 assumed control of BPC elections. Although they were not official government organs, the revolutionary committees became another mainstay of the domestic political scene. As with the people's committees and other administrative innovations since the revolution, the revolutionary committees fit the pattern of imposing a new element on the existing subnational system of government rather than eliminating or consolidating already existing structures. By the late 1970s, the result was an unnecessarily complex system of overlapping jurisdictions in which cooperation and coordination among different elements were compromised by ill-defined grants of authority and responsibility.

The changes in Libyan leadership since 1976 culminated in March 1979, when the GPC declared that the "vesting of power in the masses" and the "separation of the state from the revolution" were complete. Qadhafi relinquished his duties as general secretary of the GPC, being known thereafter as "the leader" or "Leader of the Revolution." He remained supreme commander of the armed forces. His replacement was Abdallah Ubaydi, who in effect had been prime minister since 1979. The RCC was formally dissolved and the government was again reorganized into people's committees. A new General People's Committee (cabinet) was selected, each of its "secretaries" becoming head of a specialized people's committee; the exceptions were the "secretariats" of petroleum, foreign affairs, and heavy industry, where there were no people's committees. A proposal was also made to establish a "people's army" by substituting a national militia, being formed in the late 1970s, for the national army. Although the idea surfaced again in early 1982, it did not appear to be close to implementation.

Remaking of the economy was parallel with the attempt to remold political and social institutions. Until the late 1970s, Libya's economy was mixed, with a large role for private enterprise except in the fields of oil production and distribution, banking, and insurance. But according to volume two of Qadhafi's Green Book, which appeared in 1978, private retail trade, rent, and wages were forms of "exploitation" that should be abolished. Instead, workers' self-management committees and profit participation partnerships were to function in public and private enterprises. A property law was passed that forbade ownership of more than one private dwelling, and Libyan workers took control of a large number of companies, turning them into state-run enterprises. Retail and wholesale trading operations were replaced by state-owned "people's supermarkets", where Libyans in theory could purchase whatever they needed at low prices. By 1981 the state had also restricted access to individual bank accounts to draw upon privately held funds for government projects.

http://countrystudies.us/libya/30.htm


install client regimes that will subordinate the country’s wealth and labor to imperialist corporate arcane1 May 2016 #1
Quite transparent what happened in Libya. PufPuf23 May 2016 #3
Gadaffi was involved in a lot of military adventures in other North African countries. Nitram May 2016 #70
But according to the OP SCantiGOP May 2016 #167
Gadaffi and every bullet point in your OP simply did NOT fit Hillary Clinton's business plan. CentralCoaster May 2016 #71
Not every Dictator hates there own country and people. snort May 2016 #74
The disaster of disaster capitalism. pangaia May 2016 #96
Not even close. puffy socks May 2016 #132
I have no argument with that about Gadaffi, I agree. PufPuf23 May 2016 #135
It's what NeoLiberals call "Humanitarian intervention". Funny how sufferring is actually much worse newthinking May 2016 #138
And what do you know about the suffering that wopuld have occired if Gaddafi had been left to... Nitram May 2016 #178
He may have even gone so far as to topple some incubators. frylock May 2016 #196
You of course, have an objective and peer-reviewed source to support your allegation, yes? LanternWaste May 2016 #187
"Hitler was very good for the economy" uhnope May 2016 #171
A guy who can't trust ANYONE, to the point where he has a facelift MADem May 2016 #140
"That's all of American history, summed up in a single sentence." I thought this was? Glassunion May 2016 #20
I do believe you nailed... yallerdawg May 2016 #25
Maybe that's why Saint Hillary of Walmart wanted to get Ghaddafi out of the way: Betty Karlson May 2016 #161
Sad to see what the Bush administration did... scscholar May 2016 #2
That would be Hillary Clinton and Obama who destroyed Libya nt riderinthestorm May 2016 #4
Time to crack a book, scholar. Wilms May 2016 #6
Huh? Gadaffi was removed and killed in 2011 under the Obama Administration with Clinton SOS. PufPuf23 May 2016 #9
The events leading up to that... scscholar May 2016 #98
What is your comment on what Hillary did to those poor people? nt ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #10
Ugh. SammyWinstonJack May 2016 #86
2003 was a wakeup for Gaddaffi 1939 May 2016 #94
There were a lot of Libyians that wanted to see him gone, obviously. FLPanhandle May 2016 #5
Oh obviously - TBF May 2016 #7
I guess it's like Cuba...except for the sexual assault brooklynite May 2016 #8
Like the Kuwaiti incubator babies? Mass rape allegations questioned by Amnesty mainer May 2016 #15
How can one argue that in total the people and women of Libya are far worse off now and live in PufPuf23 May 2016 #23
Yes indeed. arikara May 2016 #39
She is perhaps the most horrible democratic canddate in my lifetime of 72 years... pangaia May 2016 #99
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #49
I had not previously heard there was an email and Gadaffi assassination link. PufPuf23 May 2016 #55
Source Rass May 2016 #62
Thank you. eom. PufPuf23 May 2016 #63
A lot of our actions seem to be around fears of losing control of the monetary system (competition) newthinking May 2016 #139
Be careful! robbob May 2016 #57
DU has friending? whatthehey May 2016 #80
IDK robbob May 2016 #198
This Photo Sums Up Her Reign as Sect'y of State McKim May 2016 #176
Sad... deathrind May 2016 #137
Where did you hear/read that Libyans wanted him gone? nt ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #11
Well, there were a shitload of demonstrators in the streets early on. FLPanhandle May 2016 #14
Or maybe Hillary wanted to install a client regime to subordinate the country’s wealth... ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #18
Of course she did. polly7 May 2016 #24
Riiight FLPanhandle May 2016 #34
Riiiight. Pfffft! nt ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #36
The Libyan opposition were expat groups aligned with fundamentalist muslim groups newthinking May 2016 #141
The mobs were turned out by Saudi controlled mosques. Then leveymg May 2016 #160
There were a lot of fundamentalist tribal Libyans who hated him for not polly7 May 2016 #13
thank you... this is truth yourpaljoey May 2016 #134
Thanks Polly. I also posted a link about it. Most of the so called "arab springs" were not really newthinking May 2016 #143
Thanks very much for that link newthinking, very interesting. nt. polly7 May 2016 #144
Maybe google for a bit before opining. Wilms May 2016 #17
Typing "rainbows and puppies" is far less taxing. FlatBaroque May 2016 #26
Typing CIA is even quicker FLPanhandle May 2016 #41
Per your article... FLPanhandle May 2016 #40
"said one dissident" Wilms May 2016 #45
We have a peaceful way to remove our leaders FLPanhandle May 2016 #52
"the population"? Wilms May 2016 #58
No one is arguing things are better in Libya now. FLPanhandle May 2016 #65
How about if everyone stayed out? Wilms May 2016 #67
I agree that the US should stay out FLPanhandle May 2016 #73
OK. Good. Wilms May 2016 #83
The other side always has reasons for wanting particular politicians gone arikara May 2016 #29
Yes, but no one here has expressed those reasons. FLPanhandle May 2016 #54
He was also trying to improve the lives of people in all of Africa, polly7 May 2016 #12
I believe this is a major reason the west wanted him out of power. U4ikLefty May 2016 #153
I don't think life in Libya was quite the utopian experience as described above. LonePirate May 2016 #16
Please, do explain. nt ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #19
It wasn't too shabby either: Libya had the highest standard of living in Africa under Gadaffi CJCRANE May 2016 #21
Tripoli looks just like Baltimore, too. NuclearDem May 2016 #22
What is the matter with you that you support what happened to the common people who live in Libya? PufPuf23 May 2016 #27
I bet there was giggling. nt ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #35
That's a take on an old DU classic KamaAina May 2016 #105
Yea, and? ... ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #32
From Africa’s Wealthiest Democracy Under Gaddafi to Terrorist Haven After US Intervention polly7 May 2016 #28
"Democracy"? "US-led bombing campaign"? Try "dictatorship" and "French-led bombing campaign". nt ieoeja May 2016 #89
Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya polly7 May 2016 #102
You want to whitewash Gaddafi, do it on some other forum Blue_Tires May 2016 #30
man, you of all people say that? runaway hero May 2016 #154
Sigh. Criticizing the NATO led bombing is not synonymous with whitewashing Gaddafi. cali May 2016 #190
He was publicly sodomized with a sword FlatBaroque May 2016 #31
And Hillary Clinton finds that humorous. Hahaha. SammyWinstonJack May 2016 #91
All based on lies. And remember, this is AFTER Iraq. FlatBaroque May 2016 #93
OFFS. What is this glamorization of dictators doing here on DU? Tommy_Carcetti May 2016 #33
Your post is an excellent example of this: arcane1 May 2016 #37
The entire persona is reductionist absurdity. FlatBaroque May 2016 #82
Reductio ad absurdum is valid rhetoric. It is NOT a fallacy. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #157
Hey jberryhill May 2016 #42
Pinochet? The guy Nixon, Kissinger and CIA installed as a model for USA's future? Octafish May 2016 #43
I don't glamorize Gadaffi in this thread or elsewhere. PufPuf23 May 2016 #53
We were instrumental in installing Pinochet cali May 2016 #79
Clinton was against Gaddafi, therefore DUers need to find excuses to be for him. Donald Ian Rankin May 2016 #81
Mussolini was a competent administrator. The first Kim was a hero in the fight against Japan. ieoeja May 2016 #100
It's the knee-jerk regressive left uhnope May 2016 #174
Exposed: The "Humanitarian" War In Libya polly7 May 2016 #38
Wow. What a comprehensive post. Thank you. eom PufPuf23 May 2016 #44
You're welcome. polly7 May 2016 #48
All my adult life I have watched these foreign interventions in slow motion knowing that, PufPuf23 May 2016 #61
I agree with you completely. polly7 May 2016 #66
It's called "Backing Up Globalization with Military Might" nationalize the fed May 2016 #148
Holy God! And if Hillary is the next president, look out Iran! nt ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #60
Wow, talk about comprehensively covering a subject zeemike May 2016 #75
For all that is wrong with DU FlatBaroque May 2016 #84
This would be an excellent OP. arcane1 May 2016 #90
+1000000 SammyWinstonJack May 2016 #97
Thank you for this incredible post. What we did to Libya is such a war crime. FighttheFuture May 2016 #104
Stunning. nt thereismore May 2016 #106
awesome post! nt lakeguy May 2016 #117
This needs its own thread Martin Eden May 2016 #184
from the article... spanone May 2016 #46
For a Dictator, he was doing a great job of making life better for Libya's neighbors, too. Octafish May 2016 #47
Hello my DU hero. eom. PufPuf23 May 2016 #56
He shared the country's wealth. FlatBaroque May 2016 #85
"Wonder what Qaddafi did to piss off Washington?" SunSeeker May 2016 #205
That may be so. Iran also or instead may have been responsible. Octafish May 2016 #209
No wonder they wanted him out of there. zeemike May 2016 #50
that's hilar-- oh, wait, you're serious. uhnope May 2016 #175
Oh please. Do try to inform yourself cali May 2016 #177
oh. you again. uhnope May 2016 #185
that individuals and corporations and others try to profit off this shit, is fact cali May 2016 #189
That's serio-- oh, wait, you're hilarious.. zeemike May 2016 #180
It burns. cali May 2016 #191
Some additional reading that is important: Maedhros May 2016 #51
Great article. Thank you Maedhros. nt. polly7 May 2016 #59
Thank you for adding to the thread. PufPuf23 May 2016 #68
Facts? yallerdawg May 2016 #64
So? If CNN did not at least in part respect the document, why continue to carry it on their website PufPuf23 May 2016 #69
This is like referencing a blog. yallerdawg May 2016 #76
I wondered at the time. snort May 2016 #72
Pretty fucking pathetic... tarheelsunc May 2016 #77
Several times in this thread I have stated I regarded Gadaffi a dictator but deliberately PufPuf23 May 2016 #78
You're being deliberately distorted by Clinton sycophants who can't do nuance. arcane1 May 2016 #88
I get that. Thank you. PufPuf23 May 2016 #92
Um, the OP links an iReport CNN blog. joshcryer May 2016 #109
Without intervention Libya would look like Syria. joshcryer May 2016 #108
The main point I meant to make in this thread is that the common people of Libya PufPuf23 May 2016 #112
If you act it can go two ways. joshcryer May 2016 #114
Yes, it is pathetic. murielm99 May 2016 #204
So the trains ran on time....lol EX500rider May 2016 #87
I prefer the current Italy, even if the trains run a bit late. greatauntoftriplets May 2016 #211
Gadaffi tried to make a billion dollar gift to Louis Farrakhan. oasis May 2016 #95
What major Presidential candidate said, speaking of Gaddafi: guillaumeb May 2016 #101
It tells me that moondust May 2016 #110
That also applies fairly well to the current SOS. In my view. guillaumeb May 2016 #116
If Qaddafi was such a great guy... dubyadiprecession May 2016 #103
Here are some more facts about Gaddafi puffy socks May 2016 #107
Okay, here's a complex theory, but I think I'm onto something. Peace Patriot May 2016 #111
Interesting and thoughtful. Thank you. eom PufPuf23 May 2016 #113
My thanks also for your insights. Fair makes one's head spin doesn't it? LongTomH May 2016 #170
Not sure what is more embarrassing..... Tommy_Carcetti May 2016 #115
Don't rain on this Tiger Beat circle jerk. Throd May 2016 #118
Who loves Gadaffi? I don't. PufPuf23 May 2016 #119
Qaddafi was one of the 10 richest men EVER in history Albertoo May 2016 #120
About the wealth attributed to Gadaffi - PufPuf23 May 2016 #121
You are conflating lots of things. Bottom line: Qaddafi was a greedy dictator Albertoo May 2016 #123
I never have said Gadaffi was a good nor honorable man. PufPuf23 May 2016 #126
Oh sure, the western intervention was not well handled Albertoo May 2016 #128
My very point. Gadaffi was weak sauce to the horror unleashed upon PufPuf23 May 2016 #130
The original sin was Iraq Albertoo May 2016 #133
Not to excuse the unnecessary intervention, but some of these "facts" sound too good to be true. TacoD May 2016 #122
I have noted that the "facts" are a "perfect" presentation of intention. PufPuf23 May 2016 #124
Well, it's clear why the oligarchy couldn't have any of that! nt valerief May 2016 #125
I am disappointed by those at DU that spin that because Gadaffi was an asshole PufPuf23 May 2016 #127
We know who they're supporting in the presidential election. nt valerief May 2016 #129
Shhhh. eom. PufPuf23 May 2016 #131
It's okay if I don't say the name. nt valerief May 2016 #182
nice propaganda Mosby May 2016 #136
Agree the points were incomplete initiatives and serve as anti-intervention propoganda. PufPuf23 May 2016 #142
Gadaffi may well be still alive today had he been less interventionist himself Kaleva May 2016 #145
Yes, it was a classic oil state dictatorship. The government bought the loyalty of the people with Zynx May 2016 #146
If you read the thread my point was about the intervention and PufPuf23 May 2016 #147
Many military dictators had good intentions and policies bhikkhu May 2016 #149
I have made at least 10 posts in this thread stating the intent of this OP is PufPuf23 May 2016 #150
I don't have any first-hand knowledge about the intent of the revolution bhikkhu May 2016 #151
Forget about it. You don't even read before you respond. PufPuf23 May 2016 #152
"... it turned out well enough, eventually." < If you are white, perhaps. For a person of color, or jtuck004 May 2016 #192
Given that your OP is a 16 bullet point plus extolling of the virtues of Gadaffi.... Tommy_Carcetti May 2016 #164
I think if you repeat it all about 10 more times you are certain to have a great impact. jtuck004 May 2016 #193
Hell, even not going so far as extreme.... Tommy_Carcetti May 2016 #156
Challenging the petrodollar can be an insalubrious activity. Alkene May 2016 #155
And, and then there's that little human rights issue and sponsoring terrorism Feeling the Bern May 2016 #158
The nationalizing of oil was certainly a factor in our attempted coup Lodestar May 2016 #159
I spoke about this numerous time right here at DU several years ago...before Obama was Jitter65 May 2016 #162
Really??? A puff piece about a confirmed terrorist and murderer? hueymahl May 2016 #163
It's the same sort of binary thinking you saw when people praised Putin a few years back. Tommy_Carcetti May 2016 #166
Look at history. Gadaffi had renounced terrorism and was attempting to modernize Libya and PufPuf23 May 2016 #199
Gadaffi is a tyrant who fleeced his country and murdered his citizens. He is the ultimate 1% asshat hueymahl May 2016 #201
Libya had been a strong ally angrychair May 2016 #165
Gadafy offers Russia a naval base in Libya PufPuf23 May 2016 #197
Most murderous monsters don't know that they're bad IronLionZion May 2016 #168
My own idea of a socialist paradise would be closer to the Scandinavian countries bhikkhu May 2016 #169
This is like those lists about how African Americans were better off as slaves uhnope May 2016 #172
So, Libya was a worker's paradise, eh? MrScorpio May 2016 #173
Its pretty obvious to everyone now that this is the wrong way..or is it? LiberalLovinLug May 2016 #179
Interesting thoughts. I tend to agree. Thank you. eom PufPuf23 May 2016 #200
most interesting. niyad May 2016 #181
Pan Am Flight 103 videohead5 May 2016 #183
Yes, Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie 270 dead and his treatment of the Libyan people? Lady_Chat May 2016 #188
Gadaffi had renounced terroism, turned over perps for prosecution, and was paying damages to victims PufPuf23 May 2016 #194
i.e., a good man who did a bad thing 6chars May 2016 #202
The hatred of Hillary is so high awoke_in_2003 May 2016 #186
Who made a case for Gadaffi's sainthood? I don't. PufPuf23 May 2016 #195
Is There a Hillary Doctrine? PufPuf23 May 2016 #203
OPs like this are an embarrassment for DU. SunSeeker May 2016 #206
I suggest you read and respond the thread to be taken seriously. PufPuf23 May 2016 #207
I did read the ridiculous OP. I regret wasting my time on this shameless Qaddafi apologia. SunSeeker May 2016 #208
ITT, marks believe Quaddi propoganfa. AngryAmish May 2016 #210
Go to Lockerbie, Scotland. greatauntoftriplets May 2016 #212
How does that compare with the scars in Libya and the number of innocent people killed in Libya PufPuf23 May 2016 #214
but not freedom of speech treestar May 2016 #213
This OP served well as a honey pot for certain posters. PufPuf23 May 2016 #215
If they like Gaddafi so much and life was so ideal treestar May 2016 #217
k&r Electric Monk May 2016 #216
Kick, for visibility edgineered May 2016 #218
Update time jamzrockz Dec 2017 #219
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Facts about Libya under G...»Reply #102