General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)I'm so happy about this: Clinton Commits: No TPP, Fundamentally Rethink Trade Policies [View all]
Thank you Hillary. This article is by Dave Johnson, one of the most informed and articulate anti-TPP activists. I don't care what her motivations are. I just care that her opposition makes it harder to pass this year and that she's used language with scant wriggle room
Going into the West Virginia primary, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has come out in opposition to a lame duck vote on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). This takes her beyond her previous statements mildly opposing TPP. Clinton also made a strong statement criticizing our countrys trade agreements in general.
As reported in The Hill, in Clinton opposes TPP vote in the lame-duck session, Clinton replied to a questionnaire from the Oregon Fair Trade Campaign, which consists of more than 25 labor, environmental and human rights organizations. When asked, If elected President, would you oppose holding a vote on the TPP during the lame duck session before you take office? she replied, I have said I oppose the TPP agreement and that means before and after the election.
There has been concern that TPP will come up for a vote in the lame-duck session of Congress after the election, and before the next Congress is sworn in. This special session enables votes with little accountability to the public. Members who have been voted out can vote in ways that help them get lobbying jobs and members who were re-elected with corporate money can reward their donors.
A statement from the Oregon Fair Trade Campaign describing Clintons responses, explains the importance of Clinton opposing a lame duck vote,
The Democratic candidates agree that attempting to sneak the TPP through during lame duck is completely and totally inappropriate, said Michael Shannon, director of the Oregon Fair Trade Campaign. Popular opposition to job-killing trade agreements is at an all time high. The votes clearly do not exist to pass the TPP before the election, and TPP proponents plan to try to get just-voted-out-of-office, looking-for-corporate-lobby-work Congress members to rubber stamp it after the election is something that more-and-more politicians are speaking out against.
The Washington Post explains, in Clinton does not back Obama trade vote in postelection congressional session, that this will make it more difficult for President Obama to push TPP through the lame-duck session:
Opponents of the pact said Clintons response on the questionnaire, coming ahead of Oregons Democratic primary on May 17, represents a more definitive statement of opposition to the 12-nation Pacific Rim accord than she has given before. It could present new hurdles for the Obama administration, which is viewing a likely brief session of Congress after the Nov. 8 election as its last chance to get the deal ratified by lawmakers before the president leaves office in January.
<snip>
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-johnson/clinton-commits-no-tpp-fu_b_9887124.html