General Discussion

redStateBlueHeart

(265 posts)

41. Donald Trump: "I accept that challenge

Reply to Purveyor (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 09:35 AM

May 2016

And raise you two missiles."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Russia To Test Unstoppable 'Satan 2' Stealth Nuke Capable Of Wiping Out An Entire Nation [View all] Purveyor May 2016 OP

This kind of thing happens when a country's run by Doctor fucking Doom. NuclearDem May 2016 #1

How many hundreds of thousands innocent civilians have Russia killed in the last twenty five years Purveyor May 2016 #3

Ask Ukraine, Poland, the Baltics, Afghanistan, Central Asia, the Caucasus states, NuclearDem May 2016 #11

Got a 'body count' to go with that list? eom Purveyor May 2016 #15

Sure, why not? NuclearDem May 2016 #17

Guess you missed 'the last twenty five years' part in my reply. Make it Purveyor May 2016 #21

Given that he's KGB and has invaded two former Soviet republics so far NuclearDem May 2016 #23

Wouldn't it be relevant, necessary even, to implicitly allow not merely civilian deaths but also... LanternWaste May 2016 #45

Don't know, it's not relevent Bradical79 May 2016 #13

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! n/t malaise May 2016 #19

Well the US seems to be going full steam ahead with weapons development RedCappedBandit May 2016 #38

Full steam ahead would be war production taking 41% of GDP. LanternWaste May 2016 #46

^^^^^^^^^^^ Peacetrain May 2016 #43

Just how large a country? SheilaT May 2016 #2

"Half a dozen of those could pretty much wipe out most life on the planet" EX500rider May 2016 #6

Then what the hell is anyone worried for!? Let the unchecked arms race resume! villager May 2016 #7

I'm thinking in terms of the size given: SheilaT May 2016 #12

And just how likely is it to live up to that hype? JHB May 2016 #22

Exactly. SheilaT May 2016 #25

Downthread it's mentioned that it's a MIRV... JHB May 2016 #27

This part is such utter BS. Modern MIRV warheads are much smaller yield than '50s free fall bombs leveymg May 2016 #28

Why do you need details? pediatricmedic May 2016 #8

A bit of context. Chan790 May 2016 #20

OK, so now I'm REALLY deterred!! immoderate May 2016 #4

Gee, I wish we had one of them doomsday machines Heeeeers Johnny May 2016 #5

Ugh - this just another MIRVed ICBM - just like US MX missile - it carries up to 12 warheads jpak May 2016 #9

The difference is MX was destroyed as part of arms limitation treaties stevenleser May 2016 #40

Are we afraid now? MuseRider May 2016 #10

I'd bet the American track record is worse Matrosov May 2016 #14

Russia killed twice as many civilians in Afghanistan NuclearDem May 2016 #24

Here we go maxrandb May 2016 #16

Unless your conspiracy theory accounts for Lockheed controlling Moscow media, no. stevenleser May 2016 #18

"Strike fear" my ass. It's going to give erections to the MIC n/t arcane1 May 2016 #26

Where the F do they plan to test this beauty? Space? 7wo7rees May 2016 #29

how many megatons? Manifestor_of_Light May 2016 #30

Must be military appropriations time again thelordofhell May 2016 #31

Nope, source is Russian media, not US. See my above post. NT stevenleser May 2016 #33

In Independence Day the aliens did it wrong. TrappedInUtah May 2016 #32

The best mad scientist nuclear weapon proposal ever was U.S.A.'s "Project Pluto" hunter May 2016 #34

"We'll meet again, don't know where, don't know when..." edbermac May 2016 #35

One more awful thing to worry about. leftyladyfrommo May 2016 #36

This one goes to 11. Orrex May 2016 #37

It doesn't really change the logic of deterrence. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #39

Donald Trump: "I accept that challenge redStateBlueHeart May 2016 #41

A pic of the new weapon. Pretty scary stuff... leeroysphitz May 2016 #42

I lulz'd KG May 2016 #44

Regarding Russian military hardware? What source for that would you prefer? stevenleser May 2016 #47