Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Texas highway would be the first to allow 85 mph speed limit [View all]unblock
(56,198 posts)51. you haven't looked at the statistics. disparity in speed SEEMS scary but in practice isn't a problem
much bigger problems include alcohol, fatigue, distractions (cell phone in particular), vehicle/tire breakdowns, backing up because you missed the exit(!), tailgating, dangerous lane changes, and of course, speeding.
speed disparity really only matters when a car comes to a dead stop on the highway. THAT, of course, is extremely dangerous. but a disparity of 10, 20, or even 30 mph? get real. basically, you're saying you couldn't even share a neighborhood road with bicycles if you can't handle that kind of speed disparity.
and as i said, the only time i hang out in the middle lane is if there's already a line of cars driving like me. when that's the case, me driving alongside in the right lane only serves to block more traffic.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
as a matter of fact, i have. i've also done the austin - san antonio route many times.
unblock
Jun 2012
#30
yeah, i stick to the middle lane if there's a line of people like me, or the right lane if need be.
unblock
Jun 2012
#45
you haven't looked at the statistics. disparity in speed SEEMS scary but in practice isn't a problem
unblock
Jun 2012
#51
"driving at the average (and then perhaps 75% will be at a similar speed)" does make more sense
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2012
#63
I would think from a safety standpoint having one person radically out of sync with everyone else
4th law of robotics
Jun 2012
#44
driving extremely slowly without hazards is ticketable, yes, but 55 is never extremely slow.
unblock
Jun 2012
#46
when i was young and stupid, sure, i drove fast. at some point i realized it wasn't worth it.
unblock
Jun 2012
#43
Ever drive on the DC or Boston beltways? Eighty-five is pretty normal in the hammer lane.
HopeHoops
Jun 2012
#5
Illinoisans think that I-90 is the speed limit, and a blizzard is no reason to slow down at all.
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#9
Been there. I've also been on empty 4-lane highways in Texas - wide open at any speed.
HopeHoops
Jun 2012
#10
Straight line performance, no appreciable crosswinds, no road surface issues, minimal cross traffic
Ikonoklast
Jun 2012
#26
Yep. Agreed. I drive an Expedition for my business. 70 is about tops for safety in that thing.
Hassin Bin Sober
Jun 2012
#14
Not the first. Before the so-called oil crisis Montana had a very high speed limit,
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#8
You're right. Nothing existed before the internet or reagan, we were just props added
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#70
Montana did not have a daytime speed limit. If you could control your car at 100+ go at it.
rustydog
Jun 2012
#20
Germany has real vehicle inspections, not the "almost anything gets a pass" system here in the US.
mikeytherat
Jun 2012
#81
The time I spent in San Antonio over the last couple of years, I thought the limit was 85!
madinmaryland
Jun 2012
#64