Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

A HERETIC I AM

(24,876 posts)
52. There is a huge difference between a bicycle and an automobile,
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 07:53 PM
Jun 2012

so your statement regarding sharing neighborhood roads is spurious.

I've held a commercial drivers license since 1977. I had an operators license for about 6 months and upgraded. I have held the modern CDL since they came out in the late 1980's (got mine in 1989 in Michigan), have over 25 years operating tractor trailers, have been driving automobiles and motorcycles since 1976 and have well over 1.75 million accident free miles in all weather conditions in every one of the lower 48 states and 3 Canadian Provinces and several hundred each in Hawaii, Australia and England, just to include them all. I'm willing to put my driving experience up against anyone on this message board, including former race car drivers. Hell, I've put another 52,000 miles in my back pocket since the first of the year.

I'm pretty sure I am familiar with what causes the majority of accidents, though I am REALLY curious which statistics you are referring to. There are lies, damned lies and statistics, no?

much bigger problems include alcohol, fatigue, distractions (cell phone in particular), vehicle/tire breakdowns, backing up because you missed the exit(!), tailgating, dangerous lane changes, and of course, speeding.

Those "problems" you mention are not all causes of accidents and some raise the hazard level only minimally. While I am no fan of anyone driving impaired, there are millions of Americans that do it every single day and manage to do so safely. Being impaired is in and of itself, not a cause of accidents. Its the mistake the impaired driver makes that causes the accident, whatever that might be. (The point I want to make here is that if I come up on a guy driving straight and smooth in the right lane, he could have a BAC of .03 and I wouldn't know it and neither would you. It's just that the higher the level of impairment, the harder it is to drive straight and generally operate the vehicle in a safe manner) Ditto fatigue, distractions, tailgating, vehicle/tire breakdowns, lane changes and speeding. And in all my years of driving, I can say with confidence that the number of drivers I have seen backing up because they missed an exit is small and while it can be a cause of an accident, I am willing to bet it is a tiny fraction of accidents nationwide. Speeding and 'dangerous lane changes' go to my point I make below regarding the 75th percentile rule.

speed disparity really only matters when a car comes to a dead stop on the highway. THAT, of course, is extremely dangerous.

This statement is complete and utter nonsense. It takes MUCH less than a complete stop to create the hazard, particularly in slick conditions.

but a disparity of 10, 20, or even 30 mph? get real.


Here's your reality for ya; There is a basic safety rule called the 75th percentile rule. The safest speed to travel at, regardless of the posted speed limit is that speed which 75% of the traffic is flowing. If the speed limit is 65 and 75% of the traffic is flowing at 75mph, the safest speed to travel is 75. Conversely, if the speed limit is 80 and 75% of the traffic is doing your favorite 55mph, the safest speed to travel is 55. Where speed disparity has the greatest effect and therefore causes accidents (regularly, I should add) is when someone is traveling outside that 75th percentile, either well higher or lower, and yes, 10 mph is enough to pose a greater risk. Most certainly 20 or 30 mph. These disparities are what cause dramatic lane changes and tailgaiting, for that matter and while speeding is, as I said above, not inherently dangerous, if the speeder is outside the 75th percentile, then yes, he is a hazard. The most common cause for accidents I see on highways is when a faster driver comes up on a much slower one and either does not have the skill to properly negotiate the situation or other factors come into play (like for instance you and your rear view watching causing you to change lanes to avoid the guy coming up on you and he doesn't anticipate it). Most rear end accidents on freeways are caused by the "accordion effect" where people will change lanes, typically to the left, and each successive lane change slows that lane down to the point it is going much slower than it was before. People tend to not look far enough forward and wait too late to brake, causing a rear end accident.

If you are in that line you mentioned, running 55 down the middle lane and a group comes up behind you that is running the speed limit of 10 mph or more faster than you, then YOU are now the hazard, not the larger group. You and your compatriots are now a rolling chicane, forcing people to pass you on both the right AND the left, and being passed on the right is inherently dangerous. You are the hazard. This can not be stressed enough. BTW, from the point of view of a trucker, more and more miles of 3 lane freeway in the USA have restrictions for the truck to use the left lane, which means if you are running down the center lane, you are holding up MY PASSING LANE. I don't speed in my 18 wheeler. But I do follow the 75th percentile rule to the best of my and my trucks ability and I stay in the right lane until I need to pass someone. As soon as I have completed that pass and it is safe to do so, I GET THE FUCK BACK IN THE RIGHT LANE!

It's fine with me if you want to drive any speed above the posted minimum, as long as it is in the right hand lane where you belong. But once you move over to the left, it is your obligation to do your best to flow with traffic, long line of others notwithstanding.


The fact of the matter is, most Americans have had virtually ZERO decent driver education and the drivers ed system in this country as a whole is a fucking joke. American drivers as a group have horrible lane discipline as well. Getting a drivers license in Germany, for example is tantamount to getting a private pilots license in this country. That's how it should be. And as Hifiguy pointed out above, it is a bigger fine in Germany to pass on the right than it is to speed on the highway. But those tickets are rare because German drivers are taught lane discipline a he also mentioned.

Please, please, stay in the right lane. Lead by example and let the rest of us get on with it.

"Endeavor to never be passed on the right" is a motto that would make us all safer.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"if needed"??? unblock Jun 2012 #1
Have you ever driven across West Texas? hobbit709 Jun 2012 #4
as a matter of fact, i have. i've also done the austin - san antonio route many times. unblock Jun 2012 #30
Kindly stay the hell out of the left lane A HERETIC I AM Jun 2012 #33
yeah, i stick to the middle lane if there's a line of people like me, or the right lane if need be. unblock Jun 2012 #45
I see. You're part of the problem, then. A HERETIC I AM Jun 2012 #48
Agreed. Left lane bandits hifiguy Jun 2012 #49
you haven't looked at the statistics. disparity in speed SEEMS scary but in practice isn't a problem unblock Jun 2012 #51
There is a huge difference between a bicycle and an automobile, A HERETIC I AM Jun 2012 #52
Your 'basic safety rule' doesn't make much sense muriel_volestrangler Jun 2012 #57
Then let me put it this way; A HERETIC I AM Jun 2012 #60
"driving at the average (and then perhaps 75% will be at a similar speed)" does make more sense muriel_volestrangler Jun 2012 #63
Then I have misused the word "percentile" and for that I apologize. A HERETIC I AM Jun 2012 #67
+1 - and truth be told many folks drive that fast now TBF Jun 2012 #56
You drove 55 mph between San Antonio and Austin? 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #34
it's not illegal, lol! but no, i actually drive the speed limit (basically). unblock Jun 2012 #40
I would think from a safety standpoint having one person radically out of sync with everyone else 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #44
driving extremely slowly without hazards is ticketable, yes, but 55 is never extremely slow. unblock Jun 2012 #46
55 mph in West Texas?! Ron Obvious Jun 2012 #38
when i was young and stupid, sure, i drove fast. at some point i realized it wasn't worth it. unblock Jun 2012 #43
85 is nothing. guardian Jun 2012 #69
Dear me. Texans already drive 90. w8liftinglady Jun 2012 #2
My thoughts exactly hamsterjill Jun 2012 #12
This means you can now go 95 before being stopped by a cop. yellowcanine Jun 2012 #16
And not very well either Major Nikon Jun 2012 #24
I have went across Montana at 120+ a few times with no problems Go Vols Jun 2012 #3
Montana was forced to start write tickets for speeding by the USDOT. Ikonoklast Jun 2012 #7
I have a friend in Utah who regularly exercises his Ferraris hifiguy Jun 2012 #50
The people who were "exercising" these Ferraris Art_from_Ark Jun 2012 #72
There's not much traffic in the areas hifiguy Jun 2012 #76
Ever drive on the DC or Boston beltways? Eighty-five is pretty normal in the hammer lane. HopeHoops Jun 2012 #5
Illinoisans think that I-90 is the speed limit, and a blizzard is no reason to slow down at all. Egalitarian Thug Jun 2012 #9
Been there. I've also been on empty 4-lane highways in Texas - wide open at any speed. HopeHoops Jun 2012 #10
Try driving in the Atlanta area on I-75 or 285. RebelOne Jun 2012 #19
I-85 and I-20, too... Blue_Tires Jun 2012 #22
Yeah, forgot to mention those. n/t RebelOne Jun 2012 #58
Same on California's I-5 Auggie Jun 2012 #41
75 should probably be the limit. Turbineguy Jun 2012 #6
It isn't the safety parameters of the vehicles that is the real issue. Ikonoklast Jun 2012 #11
I think safety parameters definitely come in to play in, say, SUVs. Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2012 #17
Straight line performance, no appreciable crosswinds, no road surface issues, minimal cross traffic Ikonoklast Jun 2012 #26
That's the problem, isn't it? Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2012 #36
very true Blue_Tires Jun 2012 #23
They really need to make texting while driving part of the license test. GoneOffShore Jun 2012 #27
Funny, entertaining and VERY effective! JNelson6563 Jun 2012 #29
The old guy wasn't wearing his belt! progressoid Jun 2012 #47
I think that was part of the point. GoneOffShore Jun 2012 #53
And those who really do have skills loyalsister Jun 2012 #65
Yep. Agreed. I drive an Expedition for my business. 70 is about tops for safety in that thing. Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2012 #14
Not the first. Before the so-called oil crisis Montana had a very high speed limit, Egalitarian Thug Jun 2012 #8
We aren't supposed to remember those things KurtNYC Jun 2012 #15
You're right. Nothing existed before the internet or reagan, we were just props added Egalitarian Thug Jun 2012 #70
Montana did not have a daytime speed limit. If you could control your car at 100+ go at it. rustydog Jun 2012 #20
Montana had a "Reasonable and Prudent" statute A HERETIC I AM Jun 2012 #31
Montana's "reasonable and prudent" statute left it up to the officer ibegurpard Jun 2012 #68
Driven through Texas Xyzse Jun 2012 #13
LOL snooper2 Jun 2012 #25
Gee, increased deaths, and more pollution, what's not to love? MadHound Jun 2012 #18
Think of it as evolution in action. GoneOffShore Jun 2012 #28
It works for Germany 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #35
Better roads and cars help. Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2012 #37
And they take driving a LOT more seriously. alarimer Jun 2012 #62
Roads in Texas are just fine to handle traffic at 85 mph 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #66
Germany has real vehicle inspections, not the "almost anything gets a pass" system here in the US. mikeytherat Jun 2012 #81
Oh, the irony. AverageJoe90 Jun 2012 #21
And the best part is that modern vehicles are designed nadinbrzezinski Jun 2012 #32
First sane thing I've ever seen Texas do Taverner Jun 2012 #39
That's great news for Texas Catherina Jun 2012 #42
Snap - But we're addicted to huge cars that handle like boats. GoneOffShore Jun 2012 #54
bring it on... yeehaw. that means 92, right? oh yea, oh yea. nt seabeyond Jun 2012 #55
One thing though dsc Jun 2012 #59
You will never be able to go that fast between San Antonio and Austin. alarimer Jun 2012 #61
Amen! Thank You. Right on nilegirl Jun 2012 #79
The time I spent in San Antonio over the last couple of years, I thought the limit was 85! madinmaryland Jun 2012 #64
Back when parts of Big Sky did away with the speed limit, wasn't it 85 at night? RZM Jun 2012 #71
Link; A HERETIC I AM Jun 2012 #74
So they're "allowing" the status quo. krispos42 Jun 2012 #73
When will other states catch up? high density Jun 2012 #75
Live in Texas, but not a PROUD TEXAN! HATE IT HERE 85mph...in Texas??!! nilegirl Jun 2012 #77
Welcome to DU, nilegirl. Skinner Jun 2012 #78
Welcome to DU!!! CJCRANE Jun 2012 #80
Insurance companies' nightmare. Ambulance companies dream. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2012 #82
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Texas highway would be th...»Reply #52