Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He's keeping something but not wealth amount yeoman6987 May 2016 #1
I agree. Skwmom May 2016 #36
Nothing that precisely measures wealth maybe, but there is info that is Hoyt May 2016 #54
I used to have a lot of respect for Krugman. I mean a lot. BillZBubb May 2016 #2
You beat me to it. Tax returns don't tell the story, especially with hidden wealth riderinthestorm May 2016 #3
Earnings from investments must be reported, taxes on assets BootinUp May 2016 #9
they don't like anyone who isn't Feeling the Bern Skittles May 2016 #10
Not when you have large holding in real estate. Skwmom May 2016 #37
Real estate taxes are reported, and assessments can then be checked. It would be EASIER, pnwmom May 2016 #42
Real estate taxes would not be reported. former9thward May 2016 #55
If those companies are owned by stockholders the companies will have to publicly report finances. pnwmom May 2016 #57
Not how it works. former9thward May 2016 #58
Not really, no. You can develop estimates based on the income from assets. Zynx May 2016 #12
"In general" Major Nikon May 2016 #14
Baloney. I said in general, because on some simple returns you could guess. BillZBubb May 2016 #24
On a simple return it would be harder to guess Major Nikon May 2016 #45
No, it's because he questioning Berni-nomics, as have most reputable economists joeybee12 May 2016 #27
Bullshit. You Hillary fanatics will believe anything. BillZBubb May 2016 #34
Nope... joeybee12 May 2016 #39
Simplistic BULLSHIT. You are making a fool of yourself. BillZBubb May 2016 #43
Read below...yes you can... joeybee12 May 2016 #47
You continue to make a fool of yourself. Not surprising. BillZBubb May 2016 #48
Keep digging in..but you know if Krugman joeybee12 May 2016 #53
You're probably making Krugman sad Nevernose May 2016 #65
Since its in the Caymans and other such places we'll never know. Skink May 2016 #4
I have seen convincing estimates that he is worth about $2 billion at the most, tblue37 May 2016 #5
he is worthless to me Skittles May 2016 #16
Whether $2 billion or $10 billion he is still a very wealthy person. BillZBubb May 2016 #25
It's not silly... joeybee12 May 2016 #40
You don't think $2 billion is huge wealth? or possibly $4 billion? It is silly. BillZBubb May 2016 #46
*FACEPALM* basselope May 2016 #6
I think he does, but, first of all, economics and finance are not the same thing. Zynx May 2016 #13
Not really... basselope May 2016 #15
How about charity donations jamzrockz May 2016 #20
OH YES! Very much so. basselope May 2016 #23
Yeah, it does... joeybee12 May 2016 #30
But, it just doesn't. basselope May 2016 #49
Hard to argue with such "reason" joeybee12 May 2016 #51
scroll up for reason basselope May 2016 #59
Um, most candidates will realease more than one year... joeybee12 May 2016 #41
"standard" is whatever it is... this didn't exist prior to Nixon. basselope May 2016 #50
Yes you can...and it was standard until Mittens rMoney joeybee12 May 2016 #52
Wrong. basselope May 2016 #61
His stock holdings are, by his supposed disclosure, largely dividend paying holdings. Zynx May 2016 #62
Baloney, not on the returns of someone like Trump. BillZBubb May 2016 #26
Assuming he submits all of his related documentation for the LLCs he holds his real estate in, we Zynx May 2016 #63
And Hillary will not release her Wall Street transcripts because she loves them!!! Logical May 2016 #7
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #18
Bullshit, I WANT to know what she said in those speeches. Any real dem would. It matters because.... Logical May 2016 #19
you could easily google it and find out what people who were there joeybee12 May 2016 #31
Are you logic deprived? Apparently so. BillZBubb May 2016 #29
What does that have to do with trump? gwheezie May 2016 #38
The Good Doctor blows it on the wealth issue... Wounded Bear May 2016 #8
Um...where do business partners/associates show up on tax returns? joeybee12 May 2016 #32
Not necessarily on the 'returns'... Wounded Bear May 2016 #44
I wouldn't be surprised if it's both. GoCubsGo May 2016 #35
Shady Donald JosephAlanWatson May 2016 #11
"The revelation that Trump has been lying about something won't do much to harm him given he lies pampango May 2016 #17
Like his, um, hands. Octafish May 2016 #21
Can't he release a 1040 form with any numbers he feels like? JustABozoOnThisBus May 2016 #22
Yup LyndaG May 2016 #28
KamaAina—A Hillary Clinton Website; A Corrupt Clinton ‘Liberal’ CobaltBlue May 2016 #33
Trump-bashing is Trump-bashing. KamaAina May 2016 #56
KamaAina—I consider the source[s]. CobaltBlue May 2016 #64
You know, this part might be tinfoilish DonCoquixote May 2016 #60
This was my original horror of citizens united gwheezie May 2016 #66
K & R nt TeamPooka May 2016 #67
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Paul Krugman: Trump Won't...»Reply #21