Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
51. Been tried. Failed.
Tue May 17, 2016, 07:51 AM
May 2016

You have to import competitive advantage.

China - today's economic juggernaut/boogeyman tried the self-strengthening isolationism bit in the 19th Century. The result being they lost the economic benefit and then the political rule of one of the world's most profitable ports for a century, suffered decades of economic and technical stagnation and internal poverty of epic propoertions.

Japan tried it for a couple of centuries until the Meiji Restoration in 1868. They regressed into a semi-feudal state with much of their population as subsistence farmers, then had to pour an enormous ratio of their GDP, possible only in a central command and control political structure, into rapid re-globalization.

The Russians tried it during the Soviet era. Lines for bread hours long. Two year waits for cars 25 years behind global comparisons. Terrible standard of living.

Isolationism fails. It fails more quickly and completely with instant communications and global mobility.

We have plenty of tariffs BTW - tens of billions of revenue from them. Could they be increased? Sure if you want an instant trade war that will throw export workers on the dole years faster than new domestic manufacturing can be built. You will permanently shatter export-based manufacturers like Caterpillar whose domestic market is a fraction of their output. You will create mountains of spoiled agricultural produce that cannot be sold domestically at any price. We don't need as much soy as we grow, and China can grow their own faster than we can build our own TV factories. You will cause foreign-owned corporations to pull out of the US because they cannot afford their own supply chain, leaving their employees out of work. At the same time as this you will cause massive inflation on everything that cannot be rapidly added to the US manufacturing base (do you know how long itytakes to plan, get permission for, build, equip, hire and train workers for a new manufacturing facility, at the same time everybody else is doing it? Inflation AND delay...).

Now it will get slightly better, after years that is. The necessities will indeed be produced here, and sure people will be hired. But the rustbelt 70s won't come back. We have robots, integrated software, instant communications now. Your plan just made everybody build new plants in an inflationary market. Were you investing in that area, how sensible would it be to choose a production model that relies on workers who will be making increasing wage demands because trhey are living in a society that just turned their back on competitive advantage and doubled its prices essentially overnight? Or would you do everything in your power to have a predictable stable cost base with maximized automation?

People on DU often bemoan income inequality, and with good reason. But we've seen nothing compared to what we would in the inflationary explosion of a trade war. Anyone without highly marketable skills and an ability to work in automated industries would have no chance of a job and face prices far in excess of what we see now relying on competitive advantage to maintain affordability.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Today you desperately need them, but it doesnt have to be that way. Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #1
Because these deals line pockets in a big way, Congreess and lobbyists gain- we lose larkrake May 2016 #10
If you are willing to pay more for autos, electronics, etc., that are inferior, you can buy here. Hoyt May 2016 #2
Inferior today, agreed larkrake May 2016 #7
Sure, let's cut ourselves off from the rest of the world and see how that works. Hoyt May 2016 #20
They could pay tariffs and stay in trade with us larkrake May 2016 #27
Ever heard of a trade war? Look it up. Nationalistic America First won't work nowadays, Hoyt May 2016 #31
I am proposing Fair trade, instead of free, and not giving Corporations immunity to our laws larkrake May 2016 #39
A lot of us already live without. Rex May 2016 #3
This is true, and those trade countries do tariff their goods larkrake May 2016 #9
Similar thread here. KamaAina May 2016 #4
Thanx, very informative larkrake May 2016 #8
Less is more. nt bemildred May 2016 #5
I'm pretty sure I need coffee from one of those places. MH1 May 2016 #6
Ever hear of Kona? KamaAina May 2016 #11
Yes, but I learn something new every day MH1 May 2016 #14
LOLZ. I grew up on O'ahu and never did care for Kona Coffee.And have you seen the price these days?! Hekate May 2016 #68
More likely than not, you were getting a "Kona blend". KamaAina May 2016 #69
LOL, sadly some coffees have alot of fillers larkrake May 2016 #76
It does cost more. I wonder what is starbucks coffee source. larkrake May 2016 #75
Kona coffee is good enough, our other satallite offshoots also grow coffee and teas larkrake May 2016 #12
If I buy cheap Chinese shit from Walmart or I buy it from Amazon 1939 May 2016 #15
Yes, unions are vital to manufacturing larkrake May 2016 #17
Puerto Rico. AngryAmish May 2016 #66
If you want to go with USA only... Corporate666 May 2016 #13
Oh WOW larkrake May 2016 #16
I don't mean to sound rude but you couldn't be more wrong Corporate666 May 2016 #42
Ma bell started communications (as in Graham Bell) larkrake May 2016 #71
Tariffs decrease competition; that's the point of them muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #70
Yes, sadly the CEOs would vacumn up the profits, its the american way, in triplicate larkrake May 2016 #88
But couldn't that stuff be made here? Turin_C3PO May 2016 #33
I don't think it's that simple Corporate666 May 2016 #43
Interesting breakdown, you make sense. are we then to become a Global entity, larkrake May 2016 #89
Well Corporate666 May 2016 #101
California is bigger than most countries. Should it not trade with New York? How about with Canada? pampango May 2016 #18
Is the US Progressive? I can in good conscience say we are in REGRESSION larkrake May 2016 #22
Once again, you are wrong and have no idea what you are talking about Corporate666 May 2016 #45
I don't know where you get your information, I agree to disagree with you larkrake May 2016 #56
Of course the US is not a progressive country. But if we are to become one (which is our goal), why pampango May 2016 #48
It is a different scenario. FDR didnt have 5000 bases all over the world, he did not have two wars larkrake May 2016 #57
You may believe that FDR's views are irrelevant now. We do not agree. And progressive countries pampango May 2016 #62
No, Republicans prefer giving that power to Corporations who use child labor, desolate wages larkrake May 2016 #81
IF the US returns to the policies of FDR/Sweden on labor rights, taxation, regulation and safety net pampango May 2016 #103
sorry Pamp, please learn to digest what I said. The US is the victim of free trade larkrake May 2016 #29
Most Tilapia comes from China. karadax May 2016 #19
True. Since Fukishima and the BP spill, we are sorely lacking seafoot fit to eat larkrake May 2016 #26
Plenty of seafood out there, some better managed than others. alarimer May 2016 #55
This is not really true alarimer May 2016 #53
Fish farms are an exciting industry, that requires live people to manage larkrake May 2016 #92
Because we want to sell our stuff to them? Nt hack89 May 2016 #21
We dont sell much to them , the exception being war planes and weapons of course larkrake May 2016 #24
You couldn't be more wrong - you just have no idea what you're talking about Corporate666 May 2016 #44
you are right, absolutely, sorry I was so casual in my reply. We used fair trade doing it, so why go larkrake May 2016 #86
You are clueless hack89 May 2016 #49
I already said we feed the world, we are both correct larkrake May 2016 #87
We export $140 Billion in agriculture products annually. hack89 May 2016 #54
Sorry, larkrake, but you really truly have no clue. Please learn. Hekate May 2016 #84
Fresh Produce. Texasgal May 2016 #23
Hawaii, Puerto Rico, I'm not sure about Guam, but wow would they flourish larkrake May 2016 #25
Unfortunatly I think it all comes down to cost. Texasgal May 2016 #98
We save a lot of money by growing our own vegetables. Rex May 2016 #30
I agree with you, I'm always going to neighbors to give them my extra tomaos, zucchini larkrake May 2016 #38
Us to. I am old enough that I have taught my kids and theirs jwirr May 2016 #72
True, we'd have to go back to seasonal eating of produce... Turin_C3PO May 2016 #34
I prefer frozen, there is no waste from forgetting its in the back of the fridge, and it is larkrake May 2016 #37
If you are not freezing it Texasgal May 2016 #99
I'm with you 100%. cheapdate May 2016 #28
It isn't the needs the drive trade, it's the wants. Lancero May 2016 #32
we are good on veggies, but fruit is limited to hawaii and our southern islands larkrake May 2016 #35
You really are clueless GulfCoast66 May 2016 #52
Sorry, but it is fact that many countries have banned Monsanto larkrake May 2016 #90
I'll bite GulfCoast66 May 2016 #93
I hand mix barley, oats and corn. Mold effects the nervous and pulmunary systems larkrake May 2016 #96
Thanks for the primer on horse feed GulfCoast66 May 2016 #97
I have to agree on the chocolate. larkrake May 2016 #36
You expect the 1% to be cool with a reasonable profit TransitJohn May 2016 #40
Profit margins haven't shot up with overseas manufacturing - fact Corporate666 May 2016 #46
How naive of me larkrake May 2016 #58
Stuff from Europe and Japan is frequently superior to US-made equivalents Spider Jerusalem May 2016 #41
I'm not too sure I could live without my job jmowreader May 2016 #47
Necessity breed invention larkrake May 2016 #59
That's just the sort of thing we should be making here KamaAina May 2016 #61
I really don't understand this desire for isolation..... Adrahil May 2016 #50
I agree with you 100% larkrake May 2016 #60
It is the desire to allow people to work with dignity AngryAmish May 2016 #67
yes, yet multinational and national corps are sociopathic larkrake May 2016 #73
You don't isolation for that. NT Adrahil May 2016 #74
No, you boycott. I am not wanting isolation larkrake May 2016 #91
Been tried. Failed. whatthehey May 2016 #51
agreed, isolation isn't the answer, neither is throwing open the doors larkrake May 2016 #63
Well you asked... whatthehey May 2016 #102
Coffee. You can pry my coffee beans from my cold dead hands. Hekate May 2016 #64
Lol, the one addiction I can support larkrake May 2016 #65
"free trade" is not synonymous with "trade" mooseprime May 2016 #77
You are so correct larkrake May 2016 #82
You are using a computer and the vast majority of those are made in China. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #78
"Even American made cars use parts from various countries." KamaAina May 2016 #79
And we have free trade with Canada. The point being is that damn few of us are living without trade. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #83
Of course, China isnt stupid. They know that manufacturing is the only way to go. larkrake May 2016 #85
Just a note we do make computers here- I googled larkrake May 2016 #95
We also make the processors here Mnpaul May 2016 #100
People are gonna look at you funny dressed in those squirrel pelts Warpy May 2016 #80
well, arent we a lazy country? larkrake May 2016 #94
Latest Discussions»General Discussion» Free Trade- just what ca...»Reply #51