Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Charles Pierce: Why Do We Keep Learning New Secrets About 9/11? [View all]maxsolomon
(38,739 posts)134. good job working that zinger in
to an otherwise unrelated topic.
never stop tearing down the likely nominee!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
152 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
For pity sakes. If God had wanted us to know all about 911, He would have put it in the Bible, duh.
merrily
May 2016
#1
And if a God wanted us to know about all of the Clinton's shenanigans, he would put it
floriduck
May 2016
#56
As long as I don't mention WTC or the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan....Oops!
Ford_Prefect
May 2016
#36
Well, you know it all hangs by a very slim chad. Who would think tiny holes in paper
Ford_Prefect
May 2016
#112
We need to make sure that the Saudi's are properly armed for self defense, maybe an arms sale?
bahrbearian
May 2016
#8
We don't like to sell too many arms to radical fanatics and supporters of terrorism
FlatBaroque
May 2016
#21
why does Mr. Pierce think there's millions of "9/11 truthers" in this country?
Fast Walker 52
May 2016
#10
certain gates were opened and certain protocols were used that could ONLY be done
librechik
May 2016
#35
I will second this idea. David Lee Griffin's books are eye opening, well written, well researched,
bbgrunt
May 2016
#39
Not to mention a score of anomalies, like Building 7 just falling down on its own. nt
99th_Monkey
May 2016
#59
You ask a lot of questions but never seem to venture an opinion of your own. Hmmm. nm
rhett o rick
May 2016
#86
I didn't watch the 911 Commission proceedings, but I'm not at all surprised to hear
99th_Monkey
May 2016
#131
If you really want to know the answer to that, and aren't just being snide, here's a resource
leveymg
May 2016
#44
Yes, and all that it implies. If you read through the replies, here's my take:
leveymg
May 2016
#116
I suggest you read the longer article about CIA-UBL ties, and come back with specific questions.
leveymg
May 2016
#119
the simple answer is that both the CIA and FBI both had extensive foreknowledge of the plot
Fast Walker 52
May 2016
#115
I suspect you will nitpick this to death and never really be satisfied with anything I show
Fast Walker 52
May 2016
#122
Let's play "Guess the Point". I guess that your insinuating questions mean you
rhett o rick
May 2016
#88
Because this guy's (Saudi Ambassador Bandar)wife was writing checks to pay for ...
Botany
May 2016
#16
Through an account in Riggs Bank directed by the President's uncle, owned by Joe Allbritton
leveymg
May 2016
#46
And on the morning of 9/11/01 HW just happened to be with some members of the bin Laden ...
Botany
May 2016
#50
Yep. No amount of revisionist history will make that one go away. Once you pull the WTC7
GoneFishin
May 2016
#82
Like father, like son. Probably more interesting are the Bush bank looting deals with binLaden in
leveymg
May 2016
#70
I'll give it a rec for visibility, but . . . anyone who says, "I, for one, didn't know that a Saudi
leveymg
May 2016
#30
Where was all the zealous digging and tenacious determination to never give up the probing
maddiemom
May 2016
#38
This isn't the first time the Saudi's have been in the center of an event that damaged our nation,
Todays_Illusion
May 2016
#40
But that choice is in major contradiction of the faith Obama always cites as his own.....
Bluenorthwest
May 2016
#130
As you've been reading DU for a while, you already have seen something like 95% of it.
leveymg
May 2016
#73
True, after the pictures of children and women being tortured I figured things would change.
Rex
May 2016
#121
War crimes do not appear to have a statute of limitations. There are prosecutions still
stevenleser
May 2016
#107
Jet fuel (similar to diesel fuel) would is not be able to burn down a steel framed skyscraper ever.
nolabels
May 2016
#93
I have been a diesel truck mechanic for 38 years but here a better one for you
nolabels
May 2016
#144
I'm not going to convince you, even if i was the world's foremost metalurgist.
maxsolomon
May 2016
#148
And wealthy Saudis - including members of the royal family - are major investors in the U.S. economy
YoungDemCA
May 2016
#138
The House of Saud and their Wahhabist allies sponsor all kinds of heinous shit in the name of Islam
YoungDemCA
May 2016
#137
I've wondered the same thing. A lot of politically and economically powerful people had much to gain
AliceWonderland
May 2016
#142