Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

womanofthehills

(10,989 posts)
25. Lots of controversy here - you always side with Monsanto
Fri May 20, 2016, 12:04 AM
May 2016

Seralini's study is the ONLY long term study of Roundup. Monsanto's study was 90 days and Seralini's study was 2 years. So why doesn"t Monsanto do a 2 yr study?

Ten things you need to know about the Séralini study

1. Most criticisms of Séralini’s study wrongly assume it was a badly designed cancer study. It wasn’t. It was a chronic toxicity study – and a well-designed and well-conducted one.

2. Séralini’s study is the only long-term study on the commercialized GM maize NK603 and the pesticide (Roundup) it is designed to be grown with. See here: Why is this study important?

3. Séralini used the same strain of rat (Sprague-Dawley, SD) that Monsanto used in its 90-day studies on GM foods and its long-term studies on glyphosate, the chemical ingredient of Roundup, conducted for regulatory approval.

4. The SD rat is about as prone to tumours as humans are. As with humans, the SD rat’s tendency to cancer increases with age.

5.Compared with industry tests on GM foods, Séralini’s study analyzed the same number of rats but over a longer period (two years instead of 90 days), measured more effects more often, and was uniquely able to distinguish the effects of the GM food from the pesticide it is grown with.

6. If we argue that Séralini’s study does not prove that the GM food tested is dangerous, then we must also accept that industry studies on GM foods cannot prove they are safe.

7. Séralini’s study showed that 90-day tests commonly done on GM foods are not long enough to see long-term effects like cancer, organ damage, and premature death. The first tumours only appeared 4-7 months into the study.

8. Séralini’s study showed that industry and regulators are wrong to dismiss toxic effects seen in 90-day studies on GM foods as “not biologically meaningful”. Signs of toxicity found in Monsanto’s 90-day studies were found to develop into organ damage, cancer, and premature death in Séralini’s two-year study.

9. Long-term tests on GM foods are not required by regulators anywhere in the world.

10. GM foods have been found to have toxic effects on laboratory and farm animals in a number of studies.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

kick n/t JohnyCanuck May 2016 #1
Union of Concerned Scientists concerned about hidden costs of industrial agriculture JohnyCanuck May 2016 #2
Healthy Soil Microbes, Healthy People JohnyCanuck May 2016 #3
For more fertile soils feed the microbes, don't poison them. JohnyCanuck May 2016 #4
KnR nt bemildred May 2016 #5
As someone who has gotten pretty good at backyard composting over the years Warren DeMontague May 2016 #6
It's rough out back ... HuckleB May 2016 #7
I don't know if it is baseless fear mongering, or not. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #9
Unfortunately, it is, most of the time. HuckleB May 2016 #10
I don't think the progressive cause includes destroying the soil womanofthehills May 2016 #16
Then why do you work so hard to promote a return to more toxic herbicides? HuckleB May 2016 #17
I promote no herbicides womanofthehills May 2016 #24
Nice fantasy. HuckleB May 2016 #37
All you really need is common sense Major Nikon May 2016 #19
Well, see, an actual answer with actual information Warren DeMontague May 2016 #20
Check this out: USDA Scientist: Monsanto's Roundup Herbicide Damages Soil JohnyCanuck May 2016 #22
Benbrook's buddy who managed to make the news 5 years ago with a story that went nowhere Major Nikon May 2016 #23
Lots of controversy here - you always side with Monsanto womanofthehills May 2016 #25
I side against bullshit Major Nikon May 2016 #27
Seralini Study republished womanofthehills May 2016 #30
Yeah, it was republished in a shit journal that will publish anything for money Major Nikon May 2016 #32
Actually Seralini has been winning court victorys for libel womanofthehills May 2016 #33
Which has exactly zero to do with whether or not his studies are shit Major Nikon May 2016 #35
Glyphosate the single most important factor predisposing plants to diseases and toxins womanofthehills May 2016 #29
Electromagnetic Signals from HIV Major Nikon May 2016 #31
Thank you for the information Scientific May 2016 #8
If you haven't seen it, check out this longer video I recently posted in the Video forum JohnyCanuck May 2016 #11
One simple cure... zappaman Jun 2016 #43
Thanks for this, JohnyCanuck, jomin41 May 2016 #12
You're welcome jomin41, and an observation...... JohnyCanuck May 2016 #13
None of this surprises me. jomin41 May 2016 #14
Good info - who would want to eat food grown in soil that worms & good microbes can' t even live in womanofthehills May 2016 #15
Same journal that republished the widely discredited Seralini rat study Major Nikon May 2016 #18
I don't think something that ends with cide helps build soil womanofthehills May 2016 #26
Sure, so instead of carrying guns, criminals should just carry squirt bottles of glyphosate Major Nikon May 2016 #28
Symptoms of Glyphosate poisoning womanofthehills May 2016 #34
Sure, believe it or not people have actually managed to do suicide by glyphosate Major Nikon May 2016 #36
Soil is alive felix_numinous May 2016 #21
My son works at a store that sells it MFM008 May 2016 #38
He is spreading lies. I'm surprised he has kept this job. Bonx May 2016 #41
Farmers take billions of tons of biomass off fields every year, and we're worried about this? NickB79 May 2016 #39
Hopefully the fungus will evolve resistance to it KamaAina May 2016 #40
Antiobiotic resistence from glyphosate womanofthehills May 2016 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Roundup toxic to soil fun...»Reply #25