General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jodie Foster on taxing the rich and poverty [View all]Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)They should get their tax breaks while Jodie and Bernie with the vast fortunes take the whole thing. After all, she only has 150 million and using a tax haven like Delaware to avoid taxes. Let's make Bernie and Jodie pay for the poor. Those are burdens that Hilary and her supporters shoud not have to carry.
Let us make taxes volunteriy.
let us continue to let private interersts dictate the terms. Because as we all know, the poor attacking the rich is pure envy.
And we should not be so hard on Wall Street. They are innocent victims of leftie violence, intimidation and envy. Those pesky OWS should go get a job rather than spewing out leftie hate towards the successfu job creators.
Because taxes are theft unless you make a leftie or a working class stiff pay. Then it's called "common sacrifice"...
Since when was it a progressive stand to be against progressive taxation?
Perhaps Hillary and her supporters are not progressive at all, but in name only?
You RW "dems" talk about "free stuff" and think that the money Hillary takes from Wall Street and other places doesn't have stringts attached to it. In other words, Hillarybots are in favor of getting free money to win elections to stop the popuation from getting "free stuff" like healthcare and education. Two luxury items we don't really need.
Why are Hiarybots against investing in a country's future through education and securing it with promoting common welfare while being for getting free money from large corporations at the same time?
Can any Hillarysupporter explain that to me?
One more question:
What happened to the money Hillary colected in Holywood last month?
Did it all go to the "down ticket", or did most of it go directly back to Hillary so she could pay online trolls to smear Bernie and hype up a proffessional liar whom have more in common with the Bushies than OWS?