General Discussion

lark

(26,081 posts)

114. Wrong

Fri May 20, 2016, 12:54 PM

May 2016

Some of us care quite a bit. Keeping Drumpf out of the WH is paramount and some of us are very adamant on that point and will vote for HRC holding our noses, if that's what it takes. I'd rather get to vote for Bernie for the 2nd time, sure, but I will do everything humanly possible to ensure that the bloated nasty D is never our president. He would destroy us and walk away laughing at how stupid the public is to let him do that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

133 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jodie Foster on taxing the rich and poverty [View all] ErikJ May 2016 OP

easy peasey jodie. you and bernie, being exceedingly well off, can just pay more taxes :-) nt msongs May 2016 #1

Bernie is well off? zalinda May 2016 #3

6 figure salary and a nice pension for the rest of his life. NobodyHere May 2016 #6

And what about Hillary? eom zalinda May 2016 #9

She's well off too NobodyHere May 2016 #11

Uh no. She's very, very wealthy. cali May 2016 #13

And they pay an effective federal tax rate over 35% - about triple the Sanders' PeaceNikki May 2016 #105

So what? What I find disturbing is their greed cali May 2016 #106

So what, indeed. PeaceNikki May 2016 #109

Didn't her returns show a 35% rate? WhiteTara May 2016 #127

Bernie's the poorest Senator in US Congress. ErikJ May 2016 #10

He's not the poorest NobodyHere May 2016 #14

He might be in the top 10% but thats far from top 1% ErikJ May 2016 #15

Now you're shifting the argument. NobodyHere May 2016 #17

Yes he's well off compared to those in the lower 20% ErikJ May 2016 #18

She is worth about $31.3 million. CentralMass May 2016 #79

Shifting it back from your deflection. cui bono May 2016 #117

When did I say that? NobodyHere May 2016 #119

yes, let's vote for the least successful and the poorest. MariaThinks May 2016 #26

No, let's vote for FuzzyRabbit May 2016 #40

This!!! Silver_Witch May 2016 #92

So I guess Trump is your guy then.... blackspade May 2016 #58

Zing! n/t ejbr May 2016 #86

Another one for the FFR pile, looks like n/t Scootaloo May 2016 #78

If you can't buy several congress critters TexasMommaWithAHat May 2016 #35

Hillary has $150,000,000 putting her and Bill in the top 1% OF THE TOP 1%. But I'm guessing that's rhett o rick May 2016 #77

Rich vs wealthy elljay May 2016 #29

Then there's the uber-rich like Paul Allen ErikJ May 2016 #30

Where are his tax returns from previous years so we can see for ourselves? leftofcool May 2016 #32

Too funny. truebluegreen May 2016 #50

Let's see those tax returns. Jane still working on them? Fla Dem May 2016 #45

Transcripts..... blackspade May 2016 #60

I personally want to know what your beloved... Herman4747 May 2016 #108

He's the poorest member of the Senate..A $200,000 a year salary may make whathehell May 2016 #59

Actually NO NobodyHere May 2016 #61

Actually, YES whathehell May 2016 #65

BOTH of you, enough. According to Politifact, he's #83 7962 May 2016 #69

Having a negative net worth would scare me Yupster May 2016 #96

I know!! Definitely before you "retire", have the house & car paid for. 7962 May 2016 #99

Sounds like a good plan. That was our plan anyway........ socialist_n_TN May 2016 #100

I'm about the same age as you guys Yupster May 2016 #104

I've had to adjust my "plan" too; got laid off in July 7962 May 2016 #126

What is your point? zentrum May 2016 #66

Bernie & ALL POLITICIANS are rich. GREAT salary, benefits & GREAT pension for the rest of their live trueblue2007 May 2016 #71

If DU is a shadow of what it once was, it's these drive-by's like this closeupready May 2016 #7

no kidding... dhill926 May 2016 #8

Sports is safe... joeybee12 May 2016 #38

well....it is safe from the primary battle.... dhill926 May 2016 #39

Post removed Post removed May 2016 #27

Bernie will never be the nominee. Sanders supporters can vote for who ever they want leftofcool May 2016 #33

Agreed. I never thought i'd see such hyporcisy on the left. I'm starting to reevaluate how i MariaThinks May 2016 #36

Wrong lark May 2016 #114

Why do you think Sanders supporters would vote for any Republican? FuzzyRabbit May 2016 #43

I agree. The vast majority of Sanders' supporters will NOT vote for Trump......... socialist_n_TN May 2016 #102

I pray that doesn't happen. lark May 2016 #115

Wow. Impressively shallow with just the right dash of callousness and a splash cali May 2016 #12

+1 FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #72

I remember a time here when you were not always so negative and bitter pinboy3niner May 2016 #19

+1 FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #73

This right here ornotna May 2016 #103

But do you remember a time when he/she did anything else but post douchey post-by one liners? nt Guy Whitey Corngood May 2016 #124

Elysium. moondust May 2016 #22

Divide and Conquer strategy is no longer working. Dont call me Shirley May 2016 #23

Wow. Phlem May 2016 #28

Why raise taxes on the rich when the status quo rocks? nt hay rick May 2016 #41

Bernie is only proposing top tax rate of 52%. A full 40% LESS than Republican ErikJ May 2016 #49

Odd, could you link where she said she wasnt willing to do that because I missed it. nt cstanleytech May 2016 #51

Hmm. Your suggestion is exactly what the rich Republicans have been ladjf May 2016 #53

I'm sure they would. blackspade May 2016 #57

You obviously dont know what youre talking about re: Sanders 7962 May 2016 #68

And I bet they'd neither one mind. It's those involved in the greedy pursuit of weatlh (mammon) rhett o rick May 2016 #75

Ironic, given your candidate makes ninety thousand times the minimum wage in twenty minutes Scootaloo May 2016 #76

But not hedge fund managers and Hillary, right? Bohemianwriter May 2016 #82

my my whatta stunning/stirring defense of our monied masters she assaulted stupidicus May 2016 #88

Of course they can. And should. Isn't she basically saying that? MH1 May 2016 #90

I swear to god, HRC fans seem to offer the most braindead GOP talking points without any hint Marr May 2016 #91

Taxing wages, profit or intellectual property, is unjust Enriched May 2016 #132

Hi, Rush. I don't listen to your show, but... Beartracks May 2016 #133

When I read it I heard it in my head as read by Clarice Starling NightWatcher May 2016 #2

lol i heard it as Hannibal Lecter 0rganism May 2016 #5

I thought of fava beans. nt msanthrope May 2016 #16

With red wine? leftofcool May 2016 #52

A nice Chianti. Nt msanthrope May 2016 #83

That's a brilliant way of putting it, I never thought about it that way before. closeupready May 2016 #4

Whether communist, capitalist, or any other kind of society, Wednesdays May 2016 #120

I always figured her for a pretty smart woman... Wounded Bear May 2016 #20

Why does every stinkin' post in DU tavernier May 2016 #21

Tis the season! stillwaiting May 2016 #31

Get this truth: The uber-rich CREATE poverty! Dont call me Shirley May 2016 #24

JK Rowling has made us all poorer? (nt) Nye Bevan May 2016 #54

No doubt JK gives more away to needy causes while the banksters, mineral extractors, casino Dont call me Shirley May 2016 #55

J.K. Rowling has also made it clear that she won't leave the U.K. to avoid taxes dflprincess May 2016 #67

Exactly, I don't resent people simply for making money. RichVRichV May 2016 #128

For every JK Rowling, there are a few dozen Sheldon Adelsons. HughBeaumont May 2016 #87

Example/Rule SkyIsGrey May 2016 #113

"They create it and maintain it." ... JustABozoOnThisBus May 2016 #25

I bet noone ever figured to confirm that this quote was in fact from Jodie Foster AZ Progressive May 2016 #34

No need to divert from the actual point of the post. It's not Jodie but the hoarding by the rich. nt valerief May 2016 #64

That is one smart woman! ananda May 2016 #37

Where and when did she say this? Oneironaut May 2016 #42

Ha! phazed0 May 2016 #44

Could be in interviews about her new film, 'Money Monster' nt pinboy3niner May 2016 #46

Problem is, I don't see it attributed to her anywhere. Oneironaut May 2016 #47

DU used to follow basic attribution rules Maven May 2016 #110

See post #64. Wednesdays May 2016 #121

So why not just have the quote, then? Oneironaut May 2016 #131

K&R ReRe May 2016 #48

Thank you Ms Foster. blackspade May 2016 #56

Jodie -- I have always admired you! I admire you more!!! Great! Akamai May 2016 #62

They create it and maintain it. She hit it right on the nail! nt valerief May 2016 #63

Damn! libodem May 2016 #70

Thus said the woman with a net worth of $100 million Generic Brad May 2016 #74

She and Anjolina Jolie are quality women, the kind who could rule a nation very well larkrake May 2016 #80

eat the rich ! Angel Martin May 2016 #81

And therefore disqualifies her from saying anything? Wednesdays May 2016 #122

$100 million net worth Angel Martin May 2016 #130

This is making the rounds on FB. Love it. eom LittleGirl May 2016 #84

Kicked and recommended! nt Enthusiast May 2016 #85

she should just shutup and pay more taxes stupidicus May 2016 #89

Jodie Foster net worth $100,000,000.00 clarice May 2016 #93

I don't have a problem with someone being super rich if they're willing to pay more in taxes than liberalnarb May 2016 #94

Yes...sometimes it's polite to just say "thank you".nt clarice May 2016 #95

In other words - she's a lot smarter and works a lot harder than you tenderfoot May 2016 #97

What a nasty thing to say...shame on you.nt clarice May 2016 #98

I love you HOPNOSH May 2016 #129

So, after a certain net worth you should just shut up. Wednesdays May 2016 #123

Make of it what you will. I'm not in the mood to play today. Peace clarice May 2016 #125

That's rich liberal N proud May 2016 #101

And? TIME TO PANIC May 2016 #111

Source? Maven May 2016 #107

I agree with the sentiment, but I'm not sure it's accurately attributed to her. Pacifist Patriot May 2016 #112

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #116

I wish I had met her when I had the chance. KamaAina May 2016 #118