Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(105,922 posts)
11. A link gives the reasoning:
Fri May 20, 2016, 12:05 PM
May 2016
Today, when a car runs into a pedestrian, it often carries the person along until the driver brakes, throwing the victim from the vehicle, possibly leading to further injury as they hit the road or some other hard surface, or get hit by another car, the patent said. But that doesn't have to happen.
...
"If you had a pedestrian stuck on a car that then crashed into something else, that could be worse than if the pedestrian was thrown to the side or thrown over the car. It could also be better. It's very dependent on the chaos of the situation," Smith said. "The history of progress is replacing one set of problems with another set of problems and just really hoping that your new set of problems in aggregate is less than your original problem."

http://www.mercurynews.com/drive/ci_29905115/google-patent-protects-pedestrians-from-self-driving-cars

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Think I'd rather bounce off. Hoyt May 2016 #1
So let us say the person gets stuck to the car, yet their leg is trapped under the front wheel. Rex May 2016 #2
Why? immoderate May 2016 #3
I could think of several reasons, note these are speculation, but seem reasonable... Humanist_Activist May 2016 #14
And then the driver is blinded because of the object on his car, spins out joeybee12 May 2016 #4
Well, it is a self-driving car KamaAina May 2016 #5
Didn't see that... joeybee12 May 2016 #6
This could go bad I tell you! "The Cars That Ate Paris" trailer Katashi_itto May 2016 #7
has crash test data been done to show that this causes less injuries? Takket May 2016 #8
I haven't been to Mountain View lately KamaAina May 2016 #9
They're all over the place. Easy to spot. bluesbassman May 2016 #17
The immediate goal is not to decrease injuries... ret5hd May 2016 #10
A link gives the reasoning: muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #11
Makes sense, and with larger cars/trucks, people sometimes get pulled under, this... Humanist_Activist May 2016 #12
How do you... CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #13
The sticky stuff would be under a frangible coating, presumably. Codeine May 2016 #15
So, the second person to get hit.... CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #18
so we're counting on a thick layer of insects and bird crap to protect pedestrians? 0rganism May 2016 #16
and if the car is on fire? dembotoz May 2016 #19
Yeah, burning to death while stuck to fly paper sounds great. beevul May 2016 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Google patent: Glue would...»Reply #11