Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
42. Like many programs, Social Security had a number of precursors
Sat May 21, 2016, 02:22 PM
May 2016

Every once in a while there's a truly new idea. But not often.

Even though it attempted a Keynesian approach, Townsend's plan was noble but unsustainable. It proposed to give $200 a month to every citizen 60 or older. The Keynesian idea is that you had to spend that money; you couldn't save it. Theoretically, that requirement would stimulate the economy, generating a multiplier effect. Unfortunately, it would've been almost impossible to enforce. The cost of making sure that everyone actually spent his or her money would've been astronomical.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A very stupid quote. America has prospered by staying in the middle of the road and by avoiding Trust Buster May 2016 #1
+1. By and large, America is economically center-right and socially center-left, Nye Bevan May 2016 #2
Bullshit. Just tired right wing propaganda. Ferd Berfel May 2016 #51
. Nye Bevan May 2016 #54
your point being? quakerboy May 2016 #55
OK, Barack Obama won the last two elections, Nye Bevan May 2016 #57
Thats where that dichotomy comes in. quakerboy May 2016 #62
Gallup? Ferd Berfel May 2016 #56
Somehow, I trust Jim Hightower's analysis of American politics vastly more than either of yours. nt villager May 2016 #3
What they meant to say was, "I got mine." WhaTHellsgoingonhere May 2016 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #7
How dare he be a liberal in a dysfunctional state! villager May 2016 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #13
Well, we might each "suspect" a lot of things, which might be different. But I'm glad we share... villager May 2016 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #19
But when you look at the kind of Congress-folk Texas used to be able to elect... villager May 2016 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #26
I was never so shocked in my life Jim Beard May 2016 #50
Of course they'd both be Clinton supporters. Hortensis May 2016 #23
Same here. ananda May 2016 #15
Yes! mountain grammy May 2016 #37
Except for the fact that he blatantly ignores U.S. history, right ? Trust Buster May 2016 #59
Bzzzzzzzt! Thanks for playing RufusTFirefly May 2016 #10
+1. For use of "swarthy subversives," especially! nt villager May 2016 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #16
Actually, Bernie has articulated a wider acceptance of democratic socialism that at any time since villager May 2016 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #21
Not this cycle, true. I suspect this century will remain full of surprises. villager May 2016 #24
FDR didn't follow the yellow line. He asked for a 100% top tax rate. RufusTFirefly May 2016 #25
Exactly, they conveniently ignore inconvenient truths. Trust Buster May 2016 #60
These were all ideas whose time had come, and then Hortensis May 2016 #28
You're right those were things who's times had come. The trick is to see it coming and not A Simple Game May 2016 #43
Well, yuck to that little idea. We have something Hortensis May 2016 #46
Well Said Jim Beard May 2016 #63
Question, RufusT: SCantiGOP May 2016 #40
Like many programs, Social Security had a number of precursors RufusTFirefly May 2016 #42
The way it is supposed to work.. sendero May 2016 #47
bee ess tenderfoot May 2016 #48
+1 nt Fresh_Start May 2016 #53
Forgot about this one. Thanks for "dusting it off". libdem4life May 2016 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #6
Rush Limbaugh has one similar to that as well redstateblues May 2016 #8
Does he? Perhaps you'd like to post it here. nt villager May 2016 #11
I don't do that. I didn't mean that as a compliment. redstateblues May 2016 #29
You "don't do that" because you can't. nt villager May 2016 #36
and to the right are Yonnie3 May 2016 #17
Which makes one wonder why our entire system is built on false dualities that can only be 'met'... Shandris May 2016 #18
Absolutely true. alarimer May 2016 #27
K & R! TIME TO PANIC May 2016 #30
You'll also find the crown there. (nt) muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #31
This thread is full of moderate republicans. TIME TO PANIC May 2016 #32
I think moderate Republicans self-identify as "mainstream Democrats" now villager May 2016 #39
... and meanwhile cost us elections. TIME TO PANIC May 2016 #41
the old right is now falsely imagined as the new "center" villager May 2016 #44
Exactly Zambero May 2016 #33
Glad I don't live in Texas (no armadillos) - or 1930's Germany (no democratic left). pampango May 2016 #34
Maybe at a later date they will explain how America became a center-right nation against the will of That Guy 888 May 2016 #61
Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice. Thomas Paine Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #35
As ever, Paine knew what was up. nt villager May 2016 #38
Moderates = Republicans that are too cowardly to say so tenderfoot May 2016 #45
It's an excellent quote and totally true. tenderfoot May 2016 #49
I love that Jim Hightowerism ;-) n/t ReRe May 2016 #52
Right. Brilliant. And totally meaningless. Nitram May 2016 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"There's nothing in the m...»Reply #42