Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
12. I agree with you on the code, but not for your reason.
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 08:32 AM
Jun 2012

It's inappropriate to require girls to dress a certain way so that it doesn't affect boys' behavior. That's the same thing as not allowing women in the military because the male soldiers would find it distracting.

Males are responsible for their own behavior, attention span, and focus. Others are not required to alter their dress or behavior to conform with a way that it doesn't interfere with a male's focus, from his perspective. Males need to learn to control themselves, regardless of how girls dress or behave.

Having said that, I agree with the dress code because young girls may tend to dress a certain way to get attention, and they are not old enough to handle that kind of attention that dressing sexy would bring. They are in a school setting and are there to learn. It's inappropriate to show too much skin in a school setting, for either sex. And if only the girls are doing it, that tells you that it's a getting-attention, sex thing. Showing skin can be appropriate once a girl grows up and she's in a social setting. But even then, there will be work dress codes that will require skin covered up. It's inappropriate for a business setting.

It's looking at it from the girl's point of view, what's best for her and the school and the setting. It's not looking at it from the boy's point of view..."you can't dress that way because Bob won't be able to focus in class." You might as well say, "You can't wear the color red, because Bob finds that color distracting."

Also, showing skin and bra straps has nothing to do with the weather. It's actually cooler to wear thin cotton that covers skin; it helps to absorb moisture from the skin, and protects the skin for direct sun, when you're outside.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Papa Goldstein attended Stuyvesant 60-odd years ago MannyGoldstein Jun 2012 #1
When I used to say; "Girls didn't look like that when I was in school" maxrandb Jun 2012 #3
It's a great school with great students but they probably should have called it "No A/C Wednesdays" KurtNYC Jun 2012 #13
Yeah, I think it's one of the 3-4 NYC public high schools that have entrance tests MannyGoldstein Jun 2012 #19
Here in CA where I live, that dress code is violated daily. upaloopa Jun 2012 #2
Dress codes are sort of stupid. That's especially true for skirt schools. HopeHoops Jun 2012 #4
"Our only dress code in school was 'wear clothes'" - Hee. Posteritatis Jun 2012 #5
Well at least half of the guys had buck knives on their belts (including me). HopeHoops Jun 2012 #8
Multitools were very common among my friends in HS Posteritatis Jun 2012 #15
Well, not without an anal probe first. Can't be too careful with terrists. HopeHoops Jun 2012 #16
OK, call me a fuddy duddy but this time I spartan61 Jun 2012 #6
I'll fuddy with you. emilyg Jun 2012 #7
Teacher here, and I agree with the school. knitter4democracy Jun 2012 #9
I agree with you on the code, but not for your reason. Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #12
I'd agree if we were talking about adults. knitter4democracy Jun 2012 #17
I'm glad I taught 1st grade spartan61 Jun 2012 #18
Oh those poor, poor girls who have to cover up a little... brendan120678 Jun 2012 #10
It doesn't keep you cooler to have skin exposed. And 80 degrees isn't hot, IMO. Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #11
Were the "protest the code" students allowed in the school that day? SecurityManager Jun 2012 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»‘Slutty Wednesday’: NY hi...»Reply #12