Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
31. It would be nice if they would work to find a cure for diabetes
Sun May 22, 2016, 05:43 PM
May 2016

With all the money spent trying to stop it, they could have found a cure. Many are predisposed to diabetes.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They need to do the same thing for salt. -none May 2016 #1
Thats sodium. ErikJ May 2016 #5
Where is the sodium added line? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #13
Doesnt matter. ErikJ May 2016 #17
Add sodium would be worth noting, I would think. Gore1FL May 2016 #39
A very good step in the right direction, although I would recommend having as few labelled... Shandris May 2016 #2
I am baffled by this post tkmorris May 2016 #23
I got the gist of it. TalkingDog May 2016 #25
I'm sorry. It sounded better in my head, I suppose. I meant fresh fruits and vegetables, where... Shandris May 2016 #26
I understood it metroins May 2016 #29
"processed" is a term that has little meaning Major Nikon May 2016 #42
Processed means plenty if you don't buy any. If it's whole when you buy it any processing done is haikugal May 2016 #46
It's pretty simple not to buy processed food Major Nikon May 2016 #48
If your buying whole foods basically cooking for yourself the only things you have to worry haikugal May 2016 #59
I wouldn't agree with much of that Major Nikon May 2016 #62
Nutrition?? I can control much of that. However I don't work full time with a family to feed. That's haikugal May 2016 #63
Yes, that's it exactly. bemildred May 2016 #69
This is a non-issue, really. Old Crow May 2016 #47
Nutritionists use both terms interchangeably Major Nikon May 2016 #52
While I agree with much of what you're stating in your last post... Old Crow May 2016 #55
All purpose flour and white rice also takes a lot away Major Nikon May 2016 #57
Perhaps an equally misleading number on many of those lables pangaia May 2016 #3
I think serving size needs to be updated with reality yeoman6987 May 2016 #30
I use single servings of things most of the time Major Nikon May 2016 #44
"The government" doesn't set serving sizes jmowreader May 2016 #54
More transparency is always better JimDandy May 2016 #4
I'm sure the Republicans would love to abolish all labeling of food ErikJ May 2016 #6
Sad to say, the way our democracy has been hijacked... Old Crow May 2016 #8
They should make it all in bold including ingredients ErikJ May 2016 #7
Just don't eat factory food. nt bemildred May 2016 #9
Hmmmmm. Old Crow May 2016 #15
Labelling is good, cooking it yourself is better. bemildred May 2016 #16
Not always Urchin May 2016 #36
I think you're making my point, actually. Old Crow May 2016 #40
You Do Realize That Folks, Just Like Us. . . ProfessorGAC May 2016 #65
I should eat crappy food because it gives people jobs? bemildred May 2016 #66
Who Says It Crappy? ProfessorGAC May 2016 #67
I do. I get to decide that, for myself. bemildred May 2016 #68
I'm glad they added potassium and Vitamin D TexasBushwhacker May 2016 #10
Potassium has been optional on food labels for years SickOfTheOnePct May 2016 #14
This is HUGE news. Old Crow May 2016 #11
It would be nice if they would work to find a cure for diabetes yeoman6987 May 2016 #31
sugar is now added to tortillas and hopemountain May 2016 #12
Agreed. They keep focus-testing the products... Old Crow May 2016 #19
yes, the sugar is so refined it is hopemountain May 2016 #24
You make another good point: Artificial sweeteners are a related problem. Old Crow May 2016 #28
and it is not likely the effects of hopemountain May 2016 #32
There's even Sugar in Idodized Salt ! ! Urchin May 2016 #37
That's very true DesertRat May 2016 #22
Shouldnt be a problem. Let us decide what we want to buy 7962 May 2016 #18
It will happen in about two years DesertRat May 2016 #20
Those two labels are not supposed to be the exact same food item, correct? petronius May 2016 #21
4 g of sugar = 1 teaspoon n/t QED May 2016 #27
which = 16 calories nt hopemountain May 2016 #33
Wow, how does it get zentrum May 2016 #34
since the carbs don't change on the two labels Mosby May 2016 #35
Ah—I see. zentrum May 2016 #60
It's confusing to me. I guess I need to study up on added sugars! DawgHouse May 2016 #50
Look at the post above at Mosby. zentrum May 2016 #61
What about the GMO's ???? Equinox Moon May 2016 #38
Monsanto says you aren't allowed to know about those. Old Crow May 2016 #43
Did you know this product was made by irradiating seeds with ionizing radiation? Major Nikon May 2016 #45
Can't say that I did. What do seeds... Old Crow May 2016 #49
The exact same thing seeds have to do with GMO Major Nikon May 2016 #53
You're losing me here as a receptive audience. Old Crow May 2016 #56
I never claimed there was a reason to prefer one over the other Major Nikon May 2016 #58
You need to choose your organic milks - Organic Valley - not a corporation womanofthehills May 2016 #70
Do they make grapefruit juice? Major Nikon May 2016 #72
The only thing left out was Country of Origin. Duval May 2016 #41
I have almost completely given up packaged foods and rarely eat out. Dont call me Shirley May 2016 #51
I'm with you Equinox Moon May 2016 #64
Same with me - I think I have one can in my cabinet womanofthehills May 2016 #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Finally You Can See How M...»Reply #31