General Discussion

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)

17. In progressive parlance

Mon May 23, 2016, 09:16 AM

May 2016

"More!Conservative" means "dumber."

I can find a million more quotes though. Start with anything idiotic Thomas Frank has written in the lat 10'years. Or read the Bernie butthurt threads around here whenever he loses badly. It's always either a conapiraxy, a fraud, or voters who don't realize Marxism is their friend.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

57 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We must weed out ignorant Americans from the electorate (Washington Post Op-Ed) [View all] AntiBank May 2016 OP

Yes, weed them out. Cause what else could a newspaper possibly do to make voters smarter? Bucky May 2016 #1

Another reason.. sendero May 2016 #2

Senior editor at The Federalist rjsquirrel May 2016 #3

Link please because I never, ever believe unsubstatiated accusations. Bluenorthwest May 2016 #6

It's an op Ed rjsquirrel May 2016 #7

You offer you own assertion, being a snarky rude poster does not remove the need for you to Bluenorthwest May 2016 #12

What assertion do you mean? rjsquirrel May 2016 #14

Put up or.... cali May 2016 #9

What point do you mean!? rjsquirrel May 2016 #13

That quote does not say what you think it does. alarimer May 2016 #15

In progressive parlance rjsquirrel May 2016 #17

Leave it to squirrel to stand up for conservatives! Birds of a feather and all... BillZBubb May 2016 #32

rjsquirrel thinks Don Siegelman belongs behind bars. Octafish May 2016 #40

Correct. Because he committed a crime rjsquirrel May 2016 #41

You can call me crazy or a conspiracy theorist, I don't care. Octafish May 2016 #42

I was thinking it was probably a Republican complaining about how other Republicans are gollygee May 2016 #11

Stupid oped=Bernie supporters?? "Went to the fights and a hockey game broke out." Eleanors38 May 2016 #46

Funny, considering WaPo has spent a year being the Official Anti-Bernie Newspaper. Scootaloo May 2016 #53

Well if we did that the Republican Party would cease to exist n/t n2doc May 2016 #4

This from the same jerks that want to gut the education system and "privatize" it. nt bemildred May 2016 #5

I was going to suggest that maybe we educate them instead of weeding them out. -nt CrispyQ May 2016 #34

History repeating itself....this link shows the literacy tests used to prevent African Americans Bluenorthwest May 2016 #8

Since the Voting Rights Act has been gutted by the SCOTUS gollygee May 2016 #10

This is typical Jim Crow stuff... Jeffersons Ghost May 2016 #20

Well, then you couldn't vote either, Mr. Op-ed writer. alarimer May 2016 #16

Maybe we should require a minimum of a BA degree to vote. ileus May 2016 #18

I am listening to PBS radio, right now. It is about racism. Shall we start rechecking other things? Jeffersons Ghost May 2016 #19

Maybe a woman can't vote if she's married and the male votes. ileus May 2016 #23

Republicans will be very upset when they are not allowed to vote. L. Coyote May 2016 #21

"Ignorant people" is code for minorities and the poor YoungDemCA May 2016 #22

Ignorant people is code for "Anyone who disagrees with me". Thor_MN May 2016 #45

I agree bravenak May 2016 #52

what an inane opinion piece... Javaman May 2016 #24

That people are reading this and not seeing how fascism has long-ago infiltrated thought... Shandris May 2016 #25

Oh no you don't rock May 2016 #26

Golly, if only they had something they could use to inform the voters jeff47 May 2016 #27

Four fifths of the people who vote would be eliminated. PeteSelman May 2016 #28

So typical a discussion latrun May 2016 #29

Or, you know, educate them. (n/t) Iggo May 2016 #30

'weed out'?! what a bad choice of words WaPo! apnu May 2016 #31

But if we did that, only I would be allowed to vote... Blue_Tires May 2016 #33

Typical elitist crap. The voters make far fewer mistakes than the politicians. BillZBubb May 2016 #35

That's often true gollygee May 2016 #39

By David Harsanyi May 20 David Harsanyi is a senior editor at the Federalist. elleng May 2016 #36

One of the most important items for a well functioning representative democracy... spin May 2016 #37

The problem with leaving education to the government AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #54

A well educated electorate poses a risk in an oligarchy. ... spin May 2016 #56

Let's Start With the Editorial Page Members pmorlan1 May 2016 #38

LOL, if they had such a test, 95% of repukes would fail it Skittles May 2016 #43

WTF? I know we're not a democracy anymore but this is taking it way too far. liberal_at_heart May 2016 #44

comes off as "crass elitism" 0rganism May 2016 #47

Elitism at its finest davidn3600 May 2016 #48

Sadly, some of the more economically privilaged posters here agree with such sentiment. Odin2005 May 2016 #49

They can start by weeding out Jonathan Capehart (nt) Ino May 2016 #50

Cause it worked so well in the south applegrove May 2016 #51

Gee, 40 answers+, and nobody mentioned the writer 'might' have been having a bit of fun? Albertoo May 2016 #55

God forbid we should combat ignorance boobooday May 2016 #57