Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
15. Getting about $750k per, Andrea seems to slant coverage toward the millionaire perspective.
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:00 PM
May 2016

I could be wrong. A content analysis would help determine the answer. Until then, an overview of the phenomenon:


Media Millionaires

Journalism by and for the 0.01 Percent


By Peter Hart
FAIR, July 1, 2013

Mainstream journalism is, we’re often told, in a state of severe crisis. Newsroom employment began to decline as a result of corporate takeovers in the 1990s. Then the digital revolution destroyed the advertising market, plunging the industry into serious doubt about its very business model.

But times aren’t rough all around. There are many pundits and TV anchors who are doing very well in the media world, racking up millions of dollars from their media contracts, book deals and lucrative speaking fees. Though they don’t generally approach the compensation packages awarded to network morning show hosts like Matt Lauer or evening anchors like Diane Sawyer, they’re not exactly hurting.

Of course, being the boss means the biggest payday—and media company CEOs have been posting unbelievable incomes. In 2012, CBS head Les Moonves made $62 million, Disney’s Robert Iger made $37 million and Rupert Murdoch of Fox took home a comparatively modest $22 million (New York Times, 5/5/13). Don’t feel sorry for Murdoch, though; as No. 91 on Forbes’ list of the world’s richest people, with an estimated net worth of $11.2 billion, he’s unlikely to go to bed hungry.

The media business outstrips other industries in generously compensating its top executives (New York Times, 5/5/13), and those resources could of course be put to better use by hiring reporters. But that’s not the way the system works. And it’s not just the bosses getting rich. Indeed, many high-profile members of the media elite live a rather charmed life. The journalism business looks to be in a disastrous state—but the view from the top is just fine.

Thomas Friedman

New York Times foreign affairs columnist Tom Friedman has written a number of bestsellers, and regularly holds forth on outlets like public TV’s Charlie Rose show. All of the globe-trotting and yearning for a “radical centrism” in American politics—where sensible climate policies could be paired with cuts to social spending—have paid off handsomely.

CONTINUED...

http://fair.org/slider/cover-story-media-millionaires/



Not much against the rich, other than their oversized influence in Washington DC.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nice comeback! tonyt53 May 2016 #1
Andrea Mitchell's husband is an economic fascist. Octafish May 2016 #2
And we always base our judgement of women on their husbands. Agschmid May 2016 #4
A fair number of threads here are doing that very thing with Hillary still_one May 2016 #5
Getting about $750k per, Andrea seems to slant coverage toward the millionaire perspective. Octafish May 2016 #15
My only point was that a person should be judged on their own, not on their spouse still_one May 2016 #18
+1,000 n/t malaise May 2016 #34
Trailblazer to Hell...nt Jack Bone May 2016 #3
LOL... Dont call me Shirley May 2016 #26
WTF? melman May 2016 #6
426 views so far, 0 recs. Proud of you DU! nt TeamPooka May 2016 #17
I didn't even know she played in the NBA. Tommy_Carcetti May 2016 #7
she spends all of her time on the bench virtualobserver May 2016 #8
The current Blazers team is known for cooperation, teamwork, and friendship. HuckleB May 2016 #13
Best Gormy Cuss May 2016 #9
You mean trollblazer. nt valerief May 2016 #10
No I meant trailblazer. Agschmid May 2016 #11
Damian Lillard is a TrailBlazer. Andrea Mitchell, not so much. HuckleB May 2016 #12
In what way? demmiblue May 2016 #14
I did mean it in a positive way, and yes Sarah Palin was also somewhat of a trailblazer. Agschmid May 2016 #20
So, in other words, you can't or won't answer my question as to why you, personally, .. demmiblue May 2016 #21
I 100% answered your question. Agschmid May 2016 #23
I think you're confusing 'answer' with 'response.' They are two wholly separate words LanternWaste May 2016 #30
See if I got it, first female political correspondent? LiberalArkie May 2016 #31
She is/was not the first by any means, but you don't have to be first to be a trailblazer. Agschmid May 2016 #36
"but you don't have to be first to be a trailblazer" melman May 2016 #38
No you don't. Agschmid May 2016 #39
Okay melman May 2016 #24
She's trailblazer in furthering word salad studies in this country. FSogol May 2016 #28
Mitchell is a trailblazer for the mainstreaming of lies, propaganda and bullshit. nt TeamPooka May 2016 #16
+ 1 - yes, she led the way for right-wingers to begin posing as journalists Scientific May 2016 #22
I remember her trailblazing reporting on the Clintons trashing the WH when they left. GreatCaesarsGhost May 2016 #19
No, she is an embarrassment to all women and a corporate liar. Dont call me Shirley May 2016 #25
Trouble maker! leftofcool May 2016 #27
she is a nut case! n/t chillfactor May 2016 #29
More like Saddle Blazer. Eleanors38 May 2016 #32
she hates all things Clinton, that's for sure. spanone May 2016 #33
I don't care for her... Mike Nelson May 2016 #35
She's not my favorite nor is she a "hero" of mine. Agschmid May 2016 #37
This thread just isn't worth my time, or yours. Agschmid May 2016 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #15