General Discussion

The Polack MSgt

(13,847 posts)

32. Evidently, repeating right wing talking points are ok in the service of Sanders

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:55 PM

May 2016

Accusing someone of being a right winger is allowed if it's a Sanders fan accusing a Clinton fan.

Accuse a Sanders fan with the same language and that's worth a hide...

On Wed May 25, 2016, 11:42 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Take your pro-Trump trolling to the Primaries forum
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7855903

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Accusing posters of RW proclivities is highly uncivil.

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed May 25, 2016, 11:46 AM, and the Jury voted 5-2 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Can't directly accuse DUer of being right wing troll without more evidence than just a distorted, inflammatory OP, which is common among supporters of both candidates.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Sauce for the goose sauce for the gander.
Sanders supporters cannot possibly believe that calling some one a right winger is an alertable statement. That has been their favorite thing for 6 months now
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I can't hide a post that is obviously correct. There is no reason for the OP, that should be hidden.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

HRC's email problems just got worse [View all] jpmonk91 May 2016 OP

Always check out the author before reading a piece if I have never heard of them snooper2 May 2016 #1

Czilla has been beating up Bernie. grasswire May 2016 #6

I'm a bit surprised you haven't heard of Cillizza...he's on teevee and been around for some time. snappyturtle May 2016 #13

Oh hes swell alright Egnever May 2016 #47

She broke the rules gwheezie May 2016 #2

Just to be clear, wait for the Intel Community and FBI report leveymg May 2016 #25

I'll wait for that but the op gwheezie May 2016 #30

Technically, as head of agency, she did violate the Federal Records Act. That's in the report. leveymg May 2016 #48

Along with 80% of governments agencies Egnever May 2016 #38

But it sounds so much better to bash her by being loose with terms liberal N proud May 2016 #31

She "jaywalked," like several administrations and agency heads before her. Hoyt May 2016 #3

Hillary does a lot of things out of paranoia and it is not good jwirr May 2016 #4

as they say moonbabygo May 2016 #8

Just got worse ? Did we learn anything today that we didn't already know ? No, we did not. Trust Buster May 2016 #5

Post removed Post removed May 2016 #7

Do not accuse me of jpmonk91 May 2016 #12

Why is it only leftynyc May 2016 #20

Apparently that's today's Revolution Messaging talking point...nt joeybee12 May 2016 #27

Same poster yesterday was running around excusing all of Cornel's questionable remarks Egnever May 2016 #39

June 7th can't come soon enough leftynyc May 2016 #41

Evidently, repeating right wing talking points are ok in the service of Sanders The Polack MSgt May 2016 #32

If you don't think she broke the law jpmonk91 May 2016 #9

What law did she break? mercuryblues May 2016 #34

crickets.. Egnever May 2016 #40

She crossed the border to take a job away from a hardworkin' American Bucky May 2016 #43

As of today, the State Dept has found she violated the Federal Records Act, the Intel Commun IG has leveymg May 2016 #50

Please do Egnever May 2016 #54

There appears to have been some cherry-picking in your selection. Here's the previous paragraph: leveymg May 2016 #60

No she didn't. leftofcool May 2016 #10

Have fun in your info free bubble jpmonk91 May 2016 #11

I too pretend that people who disagree with me do so due to living in a bubble LanternWaste May 2016 #19

I'm sick of hearing about her damned emails. dawg May 2016 #14

OMG jpmonk91 May 2016 #15

Look who's talking. (nt) Paladin May 2016 #26

What official government servers were breached? [n/t] Maedhros May 2016 #16

Just google it. Here's one article. dawg May 2016 #18

Ok - thank you. Maedhros May 2016 #21

It just isn't that big of a deal to me. She was damned if she did, damned if she didn't. dawg May 2016 #22

Pardon me if I don't really care how you feel about it. Maedhros May 2016 #23

There's no integrity in helping Trump win the Presidency, either. dawg May 2016 #29

I agree about your ignore list point TeddyR May 2016 #51

Hillary and a large portion of the government. Egnever May 2016 #52

But isn't the real point here TeddyR May 2016 #53

The point is 80% of the government was told the same thing and didn't care Egnever May 2016 #55

Hillary is "special" TeddyR May 2016 #57

Not seeing that as the answer at all Egnever May 2016 #59

Every day, someone alleges "this will be the factor that brings her down!" LanternWaste May 2016 #17

This is GDP material. Kingofalldems May 2016 #24

Love this part notadmblnd May 2016 #28

Seems to be withholding of information in an official investigation. pa28 May 2016 #33

Silly Egnever May 2016 #35

No they didn't ismnotwasm May 2016 #36

Agreed Egnever May 2016 #42

The article doesn't say she broke law. She broke department policy, which is not a law. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #37

It's like someone else said Andy823 May 2016 #45

She violated State Department policy TeddyR May 2016 #56

She followed the same procedures as her predecessors. John Kerry has made good changes, pnwmom May 2016 #62

They actually were not TeddyR May 2016 #63

DOS report says HRC violated the Federal Records Act and cites criminal penaties against destruction leveymg May 2016 #58

bullshit. spanone May 2016 #44

Hey look it is Chris Cilliza Egnever May 2016 #46

She did'nt break the law. Improper practice, and poor policy is not Glassunion May 2016 #49

Yes, she did. Please see, #50 and #60 leveymg May 2016 #61