General Discussion

Egnever

(21,506 posts)

54. Please do

Wed May 25, 2016, 05:32 PM

May 2016

IC IG made a referral detailing the potential compromise of classified information to security officials within the Executive Branch. The main purpose of the referral was to notify security officials that classified information may exist on at least one private server and thumb drive that are not in the government's possession. An important distinction is that the IC IG did not make a criminal referral- it was a security referral made for counterintelligence purposes. The IC IG is statutorily required to refer potential compromises of national security information to the appropriate IC security officials. [Statement from the Inspectors General of the Intelligence Community and the Department of State Regarding the Review of Former Secretary Clinton's Emails, 7/24/15]

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/statement_of_the_icig_and_oig_regarding_review_of_clintons_emails_july_24_2015.pdf

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

HRC's email problems just got worse [View all] jpmonk91 May 2016 OP

Always check out the author before reading a piece if I have never heard of them snooper2 May 2016 #1

Czilla has been beating up Bernie. grasswire May 2016 #6

I'm a bit surprised you haven't heard of Cillizza...he's on teevee and been around for some time. snappyturtle May 2016 #13

Oh hes swell alright Egnever May 2016 #47

She broke the rules gwheezie May 2016 #2

Just to be clear, wait for the Intel Community and FBI report leveymg May 2016 #25

I'll wait for that but the op gwheezie May 2016 #30

Technically, as head of agency, she did violate the Federal Records Act. That's in the report. leveymg May 2016 #48

Along with 80% of governments agencies Egnever May 2016 #38

But it sounds so much better to bash her by being loose with terms liberal N proud May 2016 #31

She "jaywalked," like several administrations and agency heads before her. Hoyt May 2016 #3

Hillary does a lot of things out of paranoia and it is not good jwirr May 2016 #4

as they say moonbabygo May 2016 #8

Just got worse ? Did we learn anything today that we didn't already know ? No, we did not. Trust Buster May 2016 #5

Post removed Post removed May 2016 #7

Do not accuse me of jpmonk91 May 2016 #12

Why is it only leftynyc May 2016 #20

Apparently that's today's Revolution Messaging talking point...nt joeybee12 May 2016 #27

Same poster yesterday was running around excusing all of Cornel's questionable remarks Egnever May 2016 #39

June 7th can't come soon enough leftynyc May 2016 #41

Evidently, repeating right wing talking points are ok in the service of Sanders The Polack MSgt May 2016 #32

If you don't think she broke the law jpmonk91 May 2016 #9

What law did she break? mercuryblues May 2016 #34

crickets.. Egnever May 2016 #40

She crossed the border to take a job away from a hardworkin' American Bucky May 2016 #43

As of today, the State Dept has found she violated the Federal Records Act, the Intel Commun IG has leveymg May 2016 #50

Please do Egnever May 2016 #54

There appears to have been some cherry-picking in your selection. Here's the previous paragraph: leveymg May 2016 #60

No she didn't. leftofcool May 2016 #10

Have fun in your info free bubble jpmonk91 May 2016 #11

I too pretend that people who disagree with me do so due to living in a bubble LanternWaste May 2016 #19

I'm sick of hearing about her damned emails. dawg May 2016 #14

OMG jpmonk91 May 2016 #15

Look who's talking. (nt) Paladin May 2016 #26

What official government servers were breached? [n/t] Maedhros May 2016 #16

Just google it. Here's one article. dawg May 2016 #18

Ok - thank you. Maedhros May 2016 #21

It just isn't that big of a deal to me. She was damned if she did, damned if she didn't. dawg May 2016 #22

Pardon me if I don't really care how you feel about it. Maedhros May 2016 #23

There's no integrity in helping Trump win the Presidency, either. dawg May 2016 #29

I agree about your ignore list point TeddyR May 2016 #51

Hillary and a large portion of the government. Egnever May 2016 #52

But isn't the real point here TeddyR May 2016 #53

The point is 80% of the government was told the same thing and didn't care Egnever May 2016 #55

Hillary is "special" TeddyR May 2016 #57

Not seeing that as the answer at all Egnever May 2016 #59

Every day, someone alleges "this will be the factor that brings her down!" LanternWaste May 2016 #17

This is GDP material. Kingofalldems May 2016 #24

Love this part notadmblnd May 2016 #28

Seems to be withholding of information in an official investigation. pa28 May 2016 #33

Silly Egnever May 2016 #35

No they didn't ismnotwasm May 2016 #36

Agreed Egnever May 2016 #42

The article doesn't say she broke law. She broke department policy, which is not a law. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #37

It's like someone else said Andy823 May 2016 #45

She violated State Department policy TeddyR May 2016 #56

She followed the same procedures as her predecessors. John Kerry has made good changes, pnwmom May 2016 #62

They actually were not TeddyR May 2016 #63

DOS report says HRC violated the Federal Records Act and cites criminal penaties against destruction leveymg May 2016 #58

bullshit. spanone May 2016 #44

Hey look it is Chris Cilliza Egnever May 2016 #46

She did'nt break the law. Improper practice, and poor policy is not Glassunion May 2016 #49

Yes, she did. Please see, #50 and #60 leveymg May 2016 #61