Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If You Think Clinton Was Good For The Economy, Then You Don't Understand The Economy [View all]FarCenter
(19,429 posts)43. 1999 by the passage of Gramm-Leah-Bliley Act
The GrammLeachBliley Act (GLB), also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, (Pub.L. 106-102, 113 Stat. 1338, enacted November 12, 1999) or the Citigroup Relief Act[1] is an act of the 106th United States Congress (19992001). It repealed part of the GlassSteagall Act of 1933, removing barriers in the market among banking companies, securities companies and insurance companies that prohibited any one institution from acting as any combination of an investment bank, a commercial bank, and an insurance company. With the passage of the GrammLeachBliley Act, commercial banks, investment banks, securities firms, and insurance companies were allowed to consolidate. The legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley_Act
Note that it was not enforced against Citigroup in 1998 by Fed Chairman Greenspan and Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin.
A year before the law was passed, Citicorp, a commercial bank holding company, merged with the insurance company Travelers Group in 1998 to form the conglomerate Citigroup, a corporation combining banking, securities and insurance services under a house of brands that included Citibank, Smith Barney, Primerica, and Travelers. Because this merger was a violation of the GlassSteagall Act and the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, the Federal Reserve gave Citigroup a temporary waiver in September 1998.[2] Less than a year later, GLB was passed to legalize these types of mergers on a permanent basis. The law also repealed GlassSteagall's conflict of interest prohibitions "against simultaneous service by any officer, director, or employee of a securities firm as an officer, director, or employee of any member bank."
Rubin later went to work for Citigroup, and was a director of Citi during the 2008 crisis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Rubin
Upon Rubin's retirement, Clinton called him the "greatest secretary of the Treasury since Alexander Hamilton".
Robert Rubin received over $17,000,000 in compensation from Citigroup and a further $33,000,000 in stock options as of 2008.
Hopefully, the stock options expired valueless.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If You Think Clinton Was Good For The Economy, Then You Don't Understand The Economy [View all]
FarCenter
Jun 2012
OP
Consider that Clinton reappointed Greenspan twice, 1995 and just before the 2000 election
FarCenter
Jun 2012
#6
The author claims Bill was to blame for the 2008 meltdown 8 years after he left office
Major Nikon
Jun 2012
#16
Good point if you focus entirely on the stock market and ignore his policies. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#25
Exactly. He and his cohorts worked tirelessly to contain the spread of wealth and to suppress the
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#26
And the Senator was right. We've been warned more times than I care to count over a period of
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#28
My internal alarms start ringing when someone uses the phrase "both parties" a lot.
2ndAmForComputers
Jun 2012
#45
I posted the headline without changing it - but maybe the World Socialist Web Site is over the top!
FarCenter
Jun 2012
#47
yeah, he's excellent on "admitting his mistakes" after the fact. "mistakes were made" on haiti,
HiPointDem
Jun 2012
#32
Admitting mistakes does not edit/delete them out of existence and yes, those "mistakes"
TheKentuckian
Jun 2012
#37
I suppose it would be more accurate to say wage stagnation has been steady for the "99%"
G_j
Jun 2012
#22
i did it for you. seems you're misinformed. see that big jump in the top 1% starting about 94-95?
HiPointDem
Jun 2012
#34
wages went up, but not dramatically. clinton did "welfare reform" -- it's on his watch that we
HiPointDem
Jun 2012
#39
i think if you dig into the statistics you'll find the gains for median workers and under were not
HiPointDem
Jun 2012
#52
"made almost all the gains they've made since 1980" is no particular recommendation as they
HiPointDem
Jun 2012
#40
boom economies are typically better for workers than bust economies, or seem to be. but
HiPointDem
Jun 2012
#48
Please tell us how good/bad he was, COMPARED TO THE PRESIDENTS BEFORE AND AFTER HIM.
2ndAmForComputers
Jun 2012
#51