Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Uber and Lyft Have a Powerful New Enemy in Washington: Elizabeth Warren [View all]FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)71. Uber does NOT need to be shut down
The concept is great. They just need to follow the same rules that everyone else is under.
If they don't want to be regulated, their competitors should not be regulated and placed at a competitive disadvantage.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Uber and Lyft Have a Powerful New Enemy in Washington: Elizabeth Warren [View all]
FrodosPet
May 2016
OP
Initially everything that I've heard about Uber was bad. I've taken a second look at Uber...
Stellar
May 2016
#32
People who value convenience to them over workers' welfare are not true progressives.
alarimer
May 2016
#54
So only aldermen of Chicago's wealthy wards should vote? Typical Clinton Democrat
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
May 2016
#7
Too cryptic. You guys want to listen to him. You'll get the other side
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
May 2016
#11
I don't know who he is. I've seen his name a few times. Whipty dipty do. Maybe he should block me
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
May 2016
#14
The ordinance is Chicago. Rideshare is heavily regulated in NYC. One of their many lies to the
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
May 2016
#18
I don't care what this dude says. I live a crisp pitching wedge from Arena's ward.
AngryAmish
May 2016
#19
But KCR.... the people who are supplementing their income with Uber ARE workers.nt
clarice
May 2016
#37
exploited???!! I hardly think so... I'll bet no one has asked the actual drivers....
clarice
May 2016
#41
I don't really trust forums that much.... too easy to post false assumptions. nt
clarice
May 2016
#70
Has anyone asked the ACTUAL Uber drivers how they feel about this..might be relevant.nt
clarice
May 2016
#38
One more time...has anyone bothered to ask the Uber drivers what THEY think about this?nt
clarice
May 2016
#42
So if they take it from desperation, your response is to remove their choice?
TampaAnimusVortex
May 2016
#45
Exactly... and these dense common folk obviously need a team of geniuses...
TampaAnimusVortex
May 2016
#51
No, I take exception to jeopardizing a person's income because a select few have....
clarice
May 2016
#60
By the nature of it, getting a private driver to take you someplace ought to be expensive for many
The_Casual_Observer
May 2016
#53