Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If You Think Clinton Was Good For The Economy, Then You Don't Understand The Economy [View all]bigtree
(94,269 posts)49. incomes went up quite a bit
the economy for most Americans improved.
I'd go back there in a heartbeat.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If You Think Clinton Was Good For The Economy, Then You Don't Understand The Economy [View all]
FarCenter
Jun 2012
OP
Consider that Clinton reappointed Greenspan twice, 1995 and just before the 2000 election
FarCenter
Jun 2012
#6
The author claims Bill was to blame for the 2008 meltdown 8 years after he left office
Major Nikon
Jun 2012
#16
Good point if you focus entirely on the stock market and ignore his policies. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#25
Exactly. He and his cohorts worked tirelessly to contain the spread of wealth and to suppress the
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#26
And the Senator was right. We've been warned more times than I care to count over a period of
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#28
My internal alarms start ringing when someone uses the phrase "both parties" a lot.
2ndAmForComputers
Jun 2012
#45
I posted the headline without changing it - but maybe the World Socialist Web Site is over the top!
FarCenter
Jun 2012
#47
yeah, he's excellent on "admitting his mistakes" after the fact. "mistakes were made" on haiti,
HiPointDem
Jun 2012
#32
Admitting mistakes does not edit/delete them out of existence and yes, those "mistakes"
TheKentuckian
Jun 2012
#37
I suppose it would be more accurate to say wage stagnation has been steady for the "99%"
G_j
Jun 2012
#22
i did it for you. seems you're misinformed. see that big jump in the top 1% starting about 94-95?
HiPointDem
Jun 2012
#34
wages went up, but not dramatically. clinton did "welfare reform" -- it's on his watch that we
HiPointDem
Jun 2012
#39
i think if you dig into the statistics you'll find the gains for median workers and under were not
HiPointDem
Jun 2012
#52
"made almost all the gains they've made since 1980" is no particular recommendation as they
HiPointDem
Jun 2012
#40
boom economies are typically better for workers than bust economies, or seem to be. but
HiPointDem
Jun 2012
#48
Please tell us how good/bad he was, COMPARED TO THE PRESIDENTS BEFORE AND AFTER HIM.
2ndAmForComputers
Jun 2012
#51