Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Politico: The fall of Salon.com [View all]
A Facebook page dedicated to celebrating the 20th anniversary of digital media pioneer Salon is functioning as a crowdsourced eulogy.
Dozens of Salon alumni have, over the past several months, posted their favorite stories from and memories of the once-beloved liberal news site described as a left-coast, interactive version of The New Yorker, a progressive powerhouse that over the years has covered politics with a refreshing aggressiveness, in a context that left plenty of room for provocative personal essays and award-winning literary criticism.
We were inmates who took over the journalistic asylum, David Talbot, who founded the site in 1995, wrote on the Facebook page. And we let it rip we helped create online journalism, making it up as we went along. And we let nobody investors, advertisers, the jealous media establishment, mad bombers, etc get in our way.
They are mourning a publication they barely recognize today.
Sadly, Salon doesnt really exist anymore, wrote Laura Miller, one of Salons founding editors who left the site for Slate last fall. The name is still being used, but the real Salon is gone.
Salon, which Talbot originally conceived of as a smart tabloid, began as a liberal online magazine and was quickly seen as an embodiment of the medias future. For a while, particularly ahead of the dot-com boom of the late 1990s, it even looked as though it might be a success story. It lured famous writers and tech-company investors and went public in 1999. At the time, Salon was valued at $107 million.
I think its very similar to what a Vox or a Buzzfeed seems today, said Kerry Lauerman, who joined Salon in 2000 and would serve as the sites editor in chief from 2010 to 2013. There was, at first, a lot of money and excitement about Salon. There was no one else, really, in that space. ... It was kind of a brave new world, and Salon was at the forefront.
Over the last several months, POLITICO has interviewed more than two dozen current and former Salon employees and reviewed years of Salons SEC filings. On Monday, after POLITICO had made several unsuccessful attempts to interview Salon CEO Cindy Jeffers, the company dropped a bombshell: Jeffers was leaving the company effective immediately in what was described as an abrupt departure.
While the details of Salons enormous management and business challenges dominate the internal discussion at the magazine, in liberal intellectual and media circles it is widely believed that the site has lost its way.
I remember during the Bush years reading them relatively religiously, Neera Tanden, the president of the Center for American Progress, told POLITICO. Especially over the last year, they seem to have completely jumped the shark in so many ways. Theyve become and I think this is sad theyve definitely become like a joke, which is terrible for people who care about these progressive institutions.
So, what happened?
Dozens of Salon alumni have, over the past several months, posted their favorite stories from and memories of the once-beloved liberal news site described as a left-coast, interactive version of The New Yorker, a progressive powerhouse that over the years has covered politics with a refreshing aggressiveness, in a context that left plenty of room for provocative personal essays and award-winning literary criticism.
We were inmates who took over the journalistic asylum, David Talbot, who founded the site in 1995, wrote on the Facebook page. And we let it rip we helped create online journalism, making it up as we went along. And we let nobody investors, advertisers, the jealous media establishment, mad bombers, etc get in our way.
They are mourning a publication they barely recognize today.
Sadly, Salon doesnt really exist anymore, wrote Laura Miller, one of Salons founding editors who left the site for Slate last fall. The name is still being used, but the real Salon is gone.
Salon, which Talbot originally conceived of as a smart tabloid, began as a liberal online magazine and was quickly seen as an embodiment of the medias future. For a while, particularly ahead of the dot-com boom of the late 1990s, it even looked as though it might be a success story. It lured famous writers and tech-company investors and went public in 1999. At the time, Salon was valued at $107 million.
I think its very similar to what a Vox or a Buzzfeed seems today, said Kerry Lauerman, who joined Salon in 2000 and would serve as the sites editor in chief from 2010 to 2013. There was, at first, a lot of money and excitement about Salon. There was no one else, really, in that space. ... It was kind of a brave new world, and Salon was at the forefront.
Over the last several months, POLITICO has interviewed more than two dozen current and former Salon employees and reviewed years of Salons SEC filings. On Monday, after POLITICO had made several unsuccessful attempts to interview Salon CEO Cindy Jeffers, the company dropped a bombshell: Jeffers was leaving the company effective immediately in what was described as an abrupt departure.
While the details of Salons enormous management and business challenges dominate the internal discussion at the magazine, in liberal intellectual and media circles it is widely believed that the site has lost its way.
I remember during the Bush years reading them relatively religiously, Neera Tanden, the president of the Center for American Progress, told POLITICO. Especially over the last year, they seem to have completely jumped the shark in so many ways. Theyve become and I think this is sad theyve definitely become like a joke, which is terrible for people who care about these progressive institutions.
So, what happened?
Read more: http://www.politico.com/media/story/2016/05/the-fall-of-saloncom-004551#ixzz4A2PuhH9v
Agree, disagree, or do you think this piece from Politico is ironic (as it could be considered clickbait itself)? Me personally, I sort of agree that Salon has gone down the tubes in real content and integrity - but it's still a step up from Vox and Buzzfeed.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
19 replies, 5469 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
19 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
oh shit yeah. I stopped trying to look at them on a phone even before the writing started stinking.
arely staircase
May 2016
#13