Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Disturbing Truth About How Airplanes Are Maintained Today [View all]

Not long ago I was waiting for a domestic flight in a departure lounge at one of the crumbling midcentury sheds that pass for an American airport these days. There were delays, as weve all come to expect, and then the delays turned into something more ominous. The airplane I was waiting for had a serious maintenance issue, beyond the ability of a man in an orange vest to address. The entire airplane would have to be taken away for servicing and another brought to the gate in its place. This would take a while. Those of us in the departure lounge settled in for what we suspected might be hours. From the window I watched the ground crew unload the bags from the original airplane. When the new one arrived, the crew pumped the fuel, loaded the bags, and stocked the galley. It was a scene Id witnessed countless times. Soon we would board and be on the way to our destinations.
As for the first airplane, the one with the maintenance problemwhat was its destination going to be? When you have time on your hands, you begin to wonder about things like this. My own assumption, as yours might have been, was that the aircraft would be towed to a nearby hangar for a stopgap repair and then flown to a central maintenance facility run by the airline somewhere in the U.S. Or maybe there was one right here at the airport. In any case, if it needed a major overhaul, presumably it would be performed by the airlines staff of trained professionals. If Apple feels it needs a Genius Bar at its stores to deal with hardware and software that cost a few hundred dollars, an airline must have something equivalent to safeguard an airplane worth a few hundred million.
About this I would be wrongas wrong as it is possible to be. Over the past decade, nearly all large U.S. airlines have shifted heavy maintenance work on their airplanes to repair shops thousands of miles away, in developing countries, where the mechanics who take the planes apart (completely) and put them back together (or almost) may not even be able to read or speak English. US Airways and Southwest fly planes to a maintenance facility in El Salvador. Delta sends planes to Mexico. United uses a shop in China. American still does much of its most intensive maintenance in-house in the U.S., but that is likely to change in the aftermath of the companys merger with US Airways.
The airlines are shipping this maintenance work offshore for the reason youd expect: to cut labor costs. Mechanics in El Salvador, Mexico, China, and elsewhere earn a fraction of what mechanics in the U.S. do. In part because of this offshoring, the number of maintenance jobs at U.S. carriers has plummeted, from 72,000 in the year 2000 to fewer than 50,000 today. But the issue isnt just jobs. A century ago, Upton Sinclair wrote his novel The Jungle to call attention to the plight of workers in the slaughterhouses, but what really got people upset was learning how unsafe their meat was. Safety is an issue here, too. The Federal Aviation Administration is supposed to be inspecting all the overseas facilities that do maintenance for airlinesjust as it is supposed to inspect those in America. But the F.A.A. no longer has the money or the manpower to do this.
As for the first airplane, the one with the maintenance problemwhat was its destination going to be? When you have time on your hands, you begin to wonder about things like this. My own assumption, as yours might have been, was that the aircraft would be towed to a nearby hangar for a stopgap repair and then flown to a central maintenance facility run by the airline somewhere in the U.S. Or maybe there was one right here at the airport. In any case, if it needed a major overhaul, presumably it would be performed by the airlines staff of trained professionals. If Apple feels it needs a Genius Bar at its stores to deal with hardware and software that cost a few hundred dollars, an airline must have something equivalent to safeguard an airplane worth a few hundred million.
About this I would be wrongas wrong as it is possible to be. Over the past decade, nearly all large U.S. airlines have shifted heavy maintenance work on their airplanes to repair shops thousands of miles away, in developing countries, where the mechanics who take the planes apart (completely) and put them back together (or almost) may not even be able to read or speak English. US Airways and Southwest fly planes to a maintenance facility in El Salvador. Delta sends planes to Mexico. United uses a shop in China. American still does much of its most intensive maintenance in-house in the U.S., but that is likely to change in the aftermath of the companys merger with US Airways.
The airlines are shipping this maintenance work offshore for the reason youd expect: to cut labor costs. Mechanics in El Salvador, Mexico, China, and elsewhere earn a fraction of what mechanics in the U.S. do. In part because of this offshoring, the number of maintenance jobs at U.S. carriers has plummeted, from 72,000 in the year 2000 to fewer than 50,000 today. But the issue isnt just jobs. A century ago, Upton Sinclair wrote his novel The Jungle to call attention to the plight of workers in the slaughterhouses, but what really got people upset was learning how unsafe their meat was. Safety is an issue here, too. The Federal Aviation Administration is supposed to be inspecting all the overseas facilities that do maintenance for airlinesjust as it is supposed to inspect those in America. But the F.A.A. no longer has the money or the manpower to do this.
Snip
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2015/11/airplane-maintenance-disturbing-truth
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They told me the flight would be delayed because of a problem with the plane. When I asked ...
Scuba
May 2016
#3
My husband and I both worked in aircraft maintenance for nearly 30 years.
mountain grammy
May 2016
#9
Since you and your husband have had experience in this area, let me tell you about one of
Jim Beard
May 2016
#38
Mechanics who actually work for the airlines fly on the planes they repair.
The Velveteen Ocelot
May 2016
#31
I saw "United Airlines" and "San Francisco" and that's what I immediately pictured.
hunter
May 2016
#56
The most disreputable independent MROs anywhere are right here in the US
Sen. Walter Sobchak
May 2016
#15
"just as safe" is easy to claim until accidents attributable to the practice start to happen
Major Nikon
May 2016
#59
I find self-declaring victory because you're too lazy to read what I provided is pretty lame
Major Nikon
May 2016
#82
A mechanic certified by a 3rd world aviation authority = American standards
Major Nikon
May 2016
#84
You're saying there are commercial carriers crashing planes that we're not hearing about?
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#89
My father has been a maintenance worker for major airlines for almost 40 years now.
geomon666
May 2016
#32
This is why I won't fly anymore. I'm not afraid of flying. I'm afraid of airline exec decisions. nt
valerief
May 2016
#78