Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underahedgerow

(1,232 posts)
23. I'm absolutely certain those witnesses were all wild animal and animal behavioral experts.
Mon May 30, 2016, 12:25 PM
May 2016

Yeah, that was sarcasm.

I don't think the zoo officials made any mistakes at all. I think they acted in the best interests of the child and frankly in their own legal interests.

'What would have happened if'
The gorilla has smashed the kid's head against the rock, accidentally while waiting for the tranq to kick in?
If, while waiting for the tranq to kick in, the gorilla had grasped the child, fallen into the water and drowned the kid?
Decided to protect the kid from the zookeepers? And crushed him?

There are SO many variables in this situation, that the ONLY choice to make was to err on the side of protecting the child... And it's a great tragedy for everyone.

Kids are stupid and they make mistakes. Humans do too, and the parents made the mistake here, that lead to the child's endangerment and the gorilla's death. The zoo made no mistakes, they did the best they could considering the situation.

Stop blaming the zoo. While the animal wasn't at fault here, the decision had to be made on the spot about who was more important. In this case it was the kid.

It's a tragedy, but thankfully the kid should be ok.

Zookeepers are good, kind people who love the work they do, and form strong bonds with the animals in their charge. The same goes for people working in Animal Control. While there are commercial aspects to zoos that I don't like so much, by and large, the work they do these days is about species preservation, and in large part, the ONLY funds those species preservation projects receive are from public zoos. You can't have one without the other.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

An irresponsible parent created the problem. Criticizing the first responders is silly IMO. Trust Buster May 2016 #1
Yeah, but shooting the mom wasn't really an option. Bucky May 2016 #5
It was the absolute worst decision to have to make. nolabear May 2016 #2
+1 cali May 2016 #15
Did they not have tranqs on hand? (edited response) Bucky May 2016 #3
Sorry, I'll leave it up to the zoo folks. cali May 2016 #4
Still pushing the "murder" lie? SickOfTheOnePct May 2016 #6
Zoos are a disgrace 2naSalit May 2016 #7
As bad as zoos are, EL34x4 May 2016 #21
Calling it murder makes me have no respect for your opinion. pintobean May 2016 #8
And in an alternate universe... CincyDem May 2016 #9
Wish I could rec this post n/t SickOfTheOnePct May 2016 #13
Great post cali May 2016 #16
You're absolutely right. nolabear May 2016 #19
+1 GeorgeGist May 2016 #22
Great post. momto3 May 2016 #24
I rather believe the people who have day-to-day-experience with gorillas, not a random witness. DetlefK May 2016 #10
I saw the video.. sendero May 2016 #11
I saw it, too, and agree with you. The gorilla did not seem to be attacking the Nay May 2016 #12
Gorilla murder story? edbermac May 2016 #14
Perhaps it would help to child-proof the cages? (nt) stone space May 2016 #17
Agreed. And this point was included in the zoo director's first comments. CincyDem May 2016 #18
it doesn't take malicious intent for a very large animal to accidentally kill a human magical thyme May 2016 #20
I'm absolutely certain those witnesses were all wild animal and animal behavioral experts. underahedgerow May 2016 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Update on the Gorilla mur...»Reply #23