Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
15. Sure it's (italics) possible (/italics), but is it feasible?
Mon May 30, 2016, 09:29 PM
May 2016

What it would take more than just cars, and way more than just cars, is a supporting infrastructure. There's going to need to be two-way communication between the car and its environment.

I remember seeing video of a test done somewhere in the San Diego area. There were some kind of devices embedded in the asphalt, evenly spaced, and a matching device in the car. The two of them communicated as the car passed over and the car received information such as how long had been since the last car passed that spot among other things. The highlight of the video was 10 cars separated by a matter of inches going about 100 mph down the road with no one in a driver seat except in the first car.

So while I think it is possible, it's not simply a matter of producing the cars. There will need to be an infrastructure for them to communicate with. Otherwise there are too many variables such as poorly visible lines, no lines, dirt roads, construction zones, broken down cars, accidents caused by those still allowed to hold a steering wheel in their hands and blocking the roadway ahead, etc.

Possible yes. Feasible, questionably. I'd much rather see affordable education, universal healthcare, an end to food insecurity, housing for all, and a host of other societal ills addressed with the money it's going to cost. Because in the end, it will be taxes that create the infrastructure the car companies will force upon society.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I wonder if the ones with Vermont license plates will CentralMass May 2016 #1
I know there will be a lot of learning curves. But still so exciting! Imagine older people..... Logical May 2016 #2
I can see the possibilities. CentralMass May 2016 #3
This would make my life such a pleasure. Mojorabbit May 2016 #16
Many feel the same. And we will all be there some day. nt Logical May 2016 #18
Or if the ones with Massachusetts plates will know that struggle4progress May 2016 #5
:-) The Masshole driving algorithm. CentralMass May 2016 #8
This is exciting. And it occurs to me: Why can Volvo go all the way with existing tech, but... ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #4
Tesla's Autopilot Beta is pretty sophisticated and already available Zorro May 2016 #25
Great now I'll be able to send my robot to do my shopping Skink May 2016 #6
I wish I had a robot. nt Logical May 2016 #7
A pipe dream Heeeeers Johnny May 2016 #9
100% agree with every single point. WinkyDink May 2016 #10
And you are 100% wrong. Research technology advancements. People always complain. nt Logical May 2016 #12
Yes they do. I can't see anything but positive from this yeoman6987 May 2016 #30
And bad drivers too! nt Logical May 2016 #31
True! Lol. yeoman6987 May 2016 #32
You are the ones saying the automobile would never replace a horse and buggy..... Logical May 2016 #11
Not even close. Heeeeers Johnny May 2016 #13
Jets can and do land themselves. But bookmarked your post. Should be interesting. nt Logical May 2016 #14
Apples and oranges. Heeeeers Johnny May 2016 #20
Sure it's (italics) possible (/italics), but is it feasible? cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #15
It will save 20,000 people a year in the US alone. The embedded stuff is years ago..... Logical May 2016 #17
You don't see infrastructure as a necessary component? cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #19
No, I really do not at this point. Google has said very accurate road maps are required...... Logical May 2016 #21
From Windows XP to Windows 10. Wonderful change! LOL cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #22
I see your point and I know people will still want to drive...... Logical May 2016 #23
Were you rooting for H.A.L.? WinkyDink May 2016 #40
And you call yourself "Logical"? Your examples both had and have human agency. WinkyDink May 2016 #39
Lol, you really want me to list all the tech used daily that makes decisions..... Logical May 2016 #43
It doesn't need to be perfect, just better than humans Travis_0004 May 2016 #33
"but its not to difficult to be better than humans" FrodosPet May 2016 #38
Seriously? Orrex May 2016 #44
Douglas Adams has it right on people accepting new technologies TampaAnimusVortex May 2016 #45
No thanks. zappaman May 2016 #24
No thanks. I like my horse and buggy. I understand that logic. People are comfortable. nt Logical May 2016 #26
I'm waiting for my flying car. n/t zappaman May 2016 #27
You honestly think the self driving car is the same as the flying car predictions? nt Logical May 2016 #28
No, a flying car would be way better. n/t zappaman May 2016 #29
When a computer can perform voice recognition with 99.5% accuracy FrodosPet May 2016 #34
I agree, there will be a lot of initial issues. But I bet first year out it saves lives. nt Logical May 2016 #35
Yeah, but leadfooting it down the freeway is the only exercise I get these days Bucky May 2016 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2016 #36
LOL, you nailed it! Perfect! nt Logical May 2016 #37
Perfect metaphor for the democracy where only half of us vote Bucky May 2016 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Volvo's self driving car,...»Reply #15