Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Orrex

(67,106 posts)
44. Seriously?
Tue May 31, 2016, 11:16 AM
May 2016
Is that a rock, chunk of wood or is it a paper cup, piece of cardboard in the road?
One would imagine that obstacle recognition will be a basic algorithm for this technology. How to you know if it's a rock, a chunk of wood, a paper cup or a piece of cardboard?

Will it know where those little known prime parking spaces are located?
I can't imagine that the basic user/car interface wouldn't allow some input here. BY default, it will likely optimize for the best parking space based on the destination and conditions at the time of arrival. To be frank, that's kind of a silly objection.

Does it like parking at the front of the lot or the back of the lot?
I can't imagine that the basic user/car interface wouldn't allow some input here. By default, it will likely optimize for the best parking space based on the destination and conditions at the time of arrival.

Will it like to park in the shady spot, or the sunny spot?
Likely this will be an optimization feature available to the user in real time. I expect that the car will present multiple possible parking spaces and will allow the user to select his or her preference.

Can it spot when someone has gotten into a vehicle and is about to leave?
Yes, obviously. The autonomous car will be able to react to the movement of that other vehicle more quickly than a human driver would. And if the other vehicle is also autonomous, then it will probably have some kind of transponder alerting your own vehicle to its movement before it happens.

Can it anticipate when is the best time to change over to the right or left lane?
Yes. The vehicle will make that assessment based on conditions at the time of the lane change, including weather, traffic congestion, road conditions, etc.

Does it know when it's better to avoid the left or right lane altogether?
Almost certainly, based on traffic reports, etc. It will probably even be able to select a different, better route altogether in some cases.

Will it park back in or face forward?
Here, too, the user would likely be able to input a preference in real time, or perhaps set up a standing instruction so that the vehicle always parks in or out. Other than having to load the trunk, what difference would it make?

Will it recognize and overly conform to the signage of local (public or private), and municipal
parking/driving ordinances?
What do you mean by "overly?" The vehicle will obey all appropriate ordinances, yes, just as you should.

What's it going to do when traffic/street/parking lines are faded or non-existent?
It will pick up on other queues. Prototype autonomous vehicles 20 years ago were able to follow oil stains in the road, so one would have to think that the designers have considered this.

What's it going to do when those lines are covered with snow?
What do you do when those lines are covered with snow?

What's it's favorite short cut. Bonus points for knowing at what time of day?
The vehicle will be programmed to optimize safety and to select the most time-efficient route, obviously.

Is it going to slow down (and perhaps stop), when the occupants spots something interesting (and I don't' mean rubbernecking at an accident scene)?
The vehicle will almost certainly have an interface allowing the user to intervene in real time, though the vehicle will likely defer to safety concerns. That is, you can't suddenly slow the vehicle to 30MPH from 70MPH in traffic simply because you want to look at a pretty tree.

Forgive me, but your objections seem rather quaint, like someone complaining that they don't want a smartphone because it won't work with their analog answering machine.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I wonder if the ones with Vermont license plates will CentralMass May 2016 #1
I know there will be a lot of learning curves. But still so exciting! Imagine older people..... Logical May 2016 #2
I can see the possibilities. CentralMass May 2016 #3
This would make my life such a pleasure. Mojorabbit May 2016 #16
Many feel the same. And we will all be there some day. nt Logical May 2016 #18
Or if the ones with Massachusetts plates will know that struggle4progress May 2016 #5
:-) The Masshole driving algorithm. CentralMass May 2016 #8
This is exciting. And it occurs to me: Why can Volvo go all the way with existing tech, but... ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #4
Tesla's Autopilot Beta is pretty sophisticated and already available Zorro May 2016 #25
Great now I'll be able to send my robot to do my shopping Skink May 2016 #6
I wish I had a robot. nt Logical May 2016 #7
A pipe dream Heeeeers Johnny May 2016 #9
100% agree with every single point. WinkyDink May 2016 #10
And you are 100% wrong. Research technology advancements. People always complain. nt Logical May 2016 #12
Yes they do. I can't see anything but positive from this yeoman6987 May 2016 #30
And bad drivers too! nt Logical May 2016 #31
True! Lol. yeoman6987 May 2016 #32
You are the ones saying the automobile would never replace a horse and buggy..... Logical May 2016 #11
Not even close. Heeeeers Johnny May 2016 #13
Jets can and do land themselves. But bookmarked your post. Should be interesting. nt Logical May 2016 #14
Apples and oranges. Heeeeers Johnny May 2016 #20
Sure it's (italics) possible (/italics), but is it feasible? cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #15
It will save 20,000 people a year in the US alone. The embedded stuff is years ago..... Logical May 2016 #17
You don't see infrastructure as a necessary component? cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #19
No, I really do not at this point. Google has said very accurate road maps are required...... Logical May 2016 #21
From Windows XP to Windows 10. Wonderful change! LOL cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #22
I see your point and I know people will still want to drive...... Logical May 2016 #23
Were you rooting for H.A.L.? WinkyDink May 2016 #40
And you call yourself "Logical"? Your examples both had and have human agency. WinkyDink May 2016 #39
Lol, you really want me to list all the tech used daily that makes decisions..... Logical May 2016 #43
It doesn't need to be perfect, just better than humans Travis_0004 May 2016 #33
"but its not to difficult to be better than humans" FrodosPet May 2016 #38
Seriously? Orrex May 2016 #44
Douglas Adams has it right on people accepting new technologies TampaAnimusVortex May 2016 #45
No thanks. zappaman May 2016 #24
No thanks. I like my horse and buggy. I understand that logic. People are comfortable. nt Logical May 2016 #26
I'm waiting for my flying car. n/t zappaman May 2016 #27
You honestly think the self driving car is the same as the flying car predictions? nt Logical May 2016 #28
No, a flying car would be way better. n/t zappaman May 2016 #29
When a computer can perform voice recognition with 99.5% accuracy FrodosPet May 2016 #34
I agree, there will be a lot of initial issues. But I bet first year out it saves lives. nt Logical May 2016 #35
Yeah, but leadfooting it down the freeway is the only exercise I get these days Bucky May 2016 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2016 #36
LOL, you nailed it! Perfect! nt Logical May 2016 #37
Perfect metaphor for the democracy where only half of us vote Bucky May 2016 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Volvo's self driving car,...»Reply #44