Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have no idea who Rebecca Watson is, but... TreasonousBastard May 2016 #1
What kind of rats were used in the study? Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #3
No idea what rats, but the Sci Am article was one of the first... TreasonousBastard May 2016 #5
Still, there is no link to the actual study. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #6
Why should either of us care? You know perfectly well that... TreasonousBastard May 2016 #7
Because the details of the study are important. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #14
Then feel free to find the study on your own... TreasonousBastard May 2016 #19
I found the link. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #20
I apply that to posters on DU as well... LanternWaste May 2016 #15
Well, there's those of us who actually read the studies Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #17
... Javaman May 2016 #10
*snort* pinboy3niner May 2016 #11
Here's the link Scientific American gave: muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #13
If a rat is naturally more prone to tumors Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #16
Scientific American is pop sci. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #18
Yeah, you're doing your best as an apologist, aren't you? muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #21
The study used sprague-dawley rats Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #23
Scientific American provided the link; you are still attacking them for writing an article muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #25
I don't give a fuck about SA or their pop sci magazine. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #26
And yet, you continue with the ad hominem attacks against them muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #27
OK, well, I didn't see the link. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #28
TV broadcast is at 50Kw, or about 5Kw coming at your TV... SkyIsGrey May 2016 #8
Cigarettes don't cause cancer either Scientific May 2016 #2
Non-ionizing. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #4
Yep. SkyIsGrey May 2016 #9
Light bulbs, microwaves, radio, and furnaces = radiation :p MillennialDem May 2016 #12
Here are a couple more links about the sketchy study on this zombie science myth GoneOffShore May 2016 #22
I didn't watch the video, but I read the study published in Scientific American. A few things - Avalux May 2016 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cell phones (Microwaves a...»Reply #18