General Discussion

LostOne4Ever

(9,749 posts)

139. They are all Panned?

Fri Jun 3, 2016, 01:39 AM

Jun 2016

[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#009999]Deadpool?

X-Men: Days of Future Past?

X-Men: First Class?

X2: X-men united?

X-men?

The Wolverine?

Seriously, this series has only had two duds: X-men 3 and X-Men origins: Wolverine. Neither of which had Bryan Singer. And while the critics didn't like Apocalypse the audiences have liked it quite a bit.

What is more, had X-Men been in Marvel's hands they would never have even made the Deadpool movie which is one of the best super hero movies made recently.

If Disney/Marvel ever get the X-Men back they will GUT the Deadpool movies of everything the fans of the series love just to get a PG-13 rating.

Though I have to admit I am more than a little furious with Marvel. They (Marvel) are intentionally trying to sabotage the X-men comic like the did the Fantastic 4 so they can buy the franchise back on the cheap.

As a former fan of the series I can honestly say I am so angry with Marvel I hope every X-Men film breaks record after record and they never get the mutants back just to spite Marvel and Disney.[/font]

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

293 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why The Internet Is Disturbed By This �X-Men� Poster *Trigger Warning* [View all] sheshe2 Jun 2016 OP

I get that yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #1

No disagreement but... PJMcK Jun 2016 #10

Not retired, taken from FOX and given back to Marvel so they can do it right Rosco T. Jun 2016 #12

Do it right? LostOne4Ever Jun 2016 #141

I also think the IPs being in separate hands keeps MCU from getting too bloated. Act_of_Reparation Jun 2016 #185

I didn't know part 1 of your post but appreciate the knowledge yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #14

It'll never be the last one. Chan790 Jun 2016 #240

It's not the same; greiner3 Jun 2016 #39

Angelina Jolie has beaten up and been beat up by males in her movies for years. Calista241 Jun 2016 #236

Jennifer Lawrence may have no say whatsoever on the poster. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #272

my take on it quickesst Jun 2016 #2

She's also one of the X men that can hold her own in a physical fight. Volaris Jun 2016 #163

Sounds reasonable to me quickesst Jun 2016 #169

I see her in that position and I see a moment Bettie Jun 2016 #171

Exactly!! quickesst Jun 2016 #219

She,'s not portrayed in the poster as ,'poweful"... whathehell Jun 2016 #179

Yes, because the idea behind the poster is to show a character (Mystique) who is a known butt-kicker Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #197

Okay...I'm not that familiar with the series whathehell Jun 2016 #211

Hopefully, this will help shed more light on the character -- Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #217

My opinion quickesst Jun 2016 #226

Please.'re-read my post.. whathehell Jun 2016 #230

Sorry, the movie, character and plot are irrelevant. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #267

It seems.. quickesst Jun 2016 #274

I'm sorry, you are missing the point. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #275

How do these people go outside...? TipTok Jun 2016 #3

Agree, Tiptok SCantiGOP Jun 2016 #5

Hey Strom Jr!! CatWoman Jun 2016 #245

Catwoman SCantiGOP Jun 2016 #248

you are more optimistic than I am CatWoman Jun 2016 #252

18 houses. SCantiGOP Jun 2016 #261

They're not happy unless everyone around them is miserable. Skeeter Barnes Jun 2016 #48

I don't like the term "outside". Please use non-roofedness in the future. DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2016 #93

Show some sensitivity... TipTok Jun 2016 #110

You got me there. DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2016 #111

Oh my GummyBearz Jun 2016 #238

How do these people go outside...? AlbertCat Jun 2016 #191

The poster is not a superhero movie. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #268

Who cares if they see it? TipTok Jun 2016 #276

It's not using "sexy women" to sell films. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #277

I understand on an intellectual level... TipTok Jun 2016 #280

This is not "society." JackRiddler Jun 2016 #281

Billboards are out in society... TipTok Jun 2016 #282

I think advertisers should get whatever they want. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #284

Its a sexy woman in a fight.... TipTok Jun 2016 #286

They can pick a different image to promote the movie... JackRiddler Jun 2016 #287

I think you are projecting a bit... TipTok Jun 2016 #288

I think you are denying more than a bit. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #289

My image was from a previous one... TipTok Jun 2016 #290

Meh. You are the one pretending to be image-illiterate. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #291

Military recruitment ad wouldn't do much good... TipTok Jun 2016 #292

I didn't see it two weeks ago. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #293

Saw the movie with my former wife (separated). Neither of us mentioned that scene afterwards. mikehiggins Jun 2016 #4

Please, stop trying to drag context into it ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2016 #9

Though perhaps not those with the most right to complain -- females in fandom/ons/etc. moriah Jun 2016 #149

A poster featuring Jennifer Lopez in "Enough" being choked would be over the line ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2016 #253

They were pretty careful with triggering imagery in trailers, etc there. moriah Jun 2016 #266

More fan discussion of what's in the movies. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #279

The movie is not the context. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #269

No context? dark forest Jun 2016 #6

So what? JackRiddler Jun 2016 #283

Oh please, she probably ends up kicking that thing's ass. Throd Jun 2016 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #33

ACK!! SPOILER ALERT PLEASE! DeadLetterOffice Jun 2016 #41

Dude...wtf? Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #53

only in the next movie Mystique turns out to be a mole Bucky Jun 2016 #67

Yep...an actual mole. Pic related: Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #207

Changed her name to Mole-Woman Bucky Jun 2016 #235

If the internet is disturbed then the internet is fucked. AngryAmish Jun 2016 #8

Yes, when the internet and women IRL sheshe2 Jun 2016 #17

You realize this is not real life, yes? AngryAmish Jun 2016 #18

OMG!!! I choked! Quackers Jun 2016 #28

This... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #54

Went staright over your head. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #73

Jury results - LEAVE IT 6-1 George II Jun 2016 #77

OMG. Thank you George. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #80

look away child! LOOK AWAY! snooper2 Jun 2016 #176

You trying to tie an X-Men poster to any serious feminist cause is hilariously sad. phleshdef Jun 2016 #204

The poster takes up space in real life, in a public area. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #285

What does this have to do with marriage? Do you mean misogyny? Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #216

I wonder if this one will make it to 377 Major Nikon Jun 2016 #11

Because people are running out of real problems. linuxman Jun 2016 #13

VAW is no longer a real problem. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #20

This may come as a shock to you, but X-men is a movie. linuxman Jun 2016 #22

Women take a hit every day and we keep going. nt sheshe2 Jun 2016 #92

Yet this (fictional) movie seems to have stopped a few others cold. linuxman Jun 2016 #96

You just don't get it. nt sheshe2 Jun 2016 #100

Oh. Okay then. linuxman Jun 2016 #102

There is nothing to get. You are absurd. phleshdef Jun 2016 #200

And you don't know what you are talking about Loki Liesmith Jun 2016 #259

Well you don't know what you are talking about... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #260

So, no more female superheroes Bettie Jun 2016 #173

This movie poster is not a problem. If it is a problem, you're going to need to go back in time DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2016 #90

VAW is not a big thing? Alrighty then. nt sheshe2 Jun 2016 #94

You've failed at trying to put words in my mouth. Do you recall sentence diagramming from school? DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2016 #97

Nobody said that but you. linuxman Jun 2016 #98

It's slightly more prevalent than violence against men in a domestic context. sibelian Jun 2016 #156

The tactic 'putting words into the mouths of others' is a bully's tactic, it is a form of rhetorical Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #165

I would disagree skepticscott Jun 2016 #181

Maybe you want all the female superheroes... TipTok Jun 2016 #114

I suspect around 50 /50. AlbertCat Jun 2016 #195

Are DU'ers actually suggesting you... yallerdawg Jun 2016 #15

"Casual internet misogyny." sheshe2 Jun 2016 #16

This is a venue where a woman can be told okasha Jun 2016 #24

Bricks are okay here. A leave!!!!!! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #29

Got your back, sister. okasha Jun 2016 #113

Love you back! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #131

"the victim in that picture is not white, and her attacker is?" melman Jun 2016 #32

The woman in the picture can become any color she wants. christx30 Jun 2016 #40

Two points. okasha Jun 2016 #123

Yes! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #132

I agree about the VAW aspect, but I really don't understand the color argument... Humanist_Activist Jun 2016 #143

It's evident to anyone who has bothered to educate themselves, okasha skepticscott Jun 2016 #170

you are correct! Remember the outrage when this came out! snooper2 Jun 2016 #180

Two points phleshdef Jun 2016 #201

How do you know it is a man's hand? Egnever Jun 2016 #234

Species: opposable thumb. okasha Jun 2016 #265

"Am I the only person to note that the victim in that picture is not white, and her attacker is?" Lordquinton Jun 2016 #144

Yes. You are the only person to notice that. sibelian Jun 2016 #159

Her coloration (blue) has nothing to do with race skepticscott Jun 2016 #162

Have you seen this! I walked out of this movie, blatant shaming- snooper2 Jun 2016 #178

Help help...I'm being repressed. Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #56

I didn't vote for you... TipTok Jun 2016 #119

Love it... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #120

I try not to associate with anyone... TipTok Jun 2016 #124

. Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #126

People that can't see misogyny are bound to repeat it. William769 Jun 2016 #19

Thank you. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #21

And people that see it when nothing is there...? n/t A Simple Game Jun 2016 #25

See post #19. William769 Jun 2016 #27

In case you didn't notice, that was the post I was responding to. A Simple Game Jun 2016 #37

Still same response. William769 Jun 2016 #44

I see you have the time to respond, could it be you don't want to answer in which A Simple Game Jun 2016 #172

I disagree. This is an action film Quackers Jun 2016 #23

This is not a film. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #278

Where's the context? Matrosov Jun 2016 #26

Hmmm... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #55

Why not, who doesn't like shapeshifting badass hottie! snooper2 Jun 2016 #183

Lets just not cast any women in action movies, so you wont be offended. Travis_0004 Jun 2016 #30

Boom... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #86

Or... rpannier Jun 2016 #101

So now Mutants want equal rights? Reter Jun 2016 #31

This message was self-deleted by its author Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #36

Seriously, stop with the plot reveals DeadLetterOffice Jun 2016 #42

So sorry. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #45

Self delete... TipTok Jun 2016 #122

Done, and it is worth seeing. Not as good as Captain America Civil War Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #125

You just saved people the trouble of watching the movie. Nicely done. Orrex Jun 2016 #43

Which is why I said "Mystique is mostly a villain anyway" Reter Jun 2016 #57

Which is more of a threat? cagefreesoylentgreen Jun 2016 #34

Your post is sheshe2 Jun 2016 #46

Actually cagefreesoylentgreen Jun 2016 #50

So please. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #52

"Handle" is another word for "username" EvolveOrConvolve Jun 2016 #66

Blue lives matter! X_Digger Jun 2016 #58

You are a DU monitor? sheshe2 Jun 2016 #59

Your post is Rather antagonistic toward me. AlbertCat Jun 2016 #198

This was an epic, life or death struggle in a super hero movie for the fate of the world. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #35

No. The movie is irrelevant. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #270

Mystique is a violent, dangerous, psychopath of a woman IronLionZion Jun 2016 #38

Thanks ILZ. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #49

Anyone "sold" expecting going to see women lose is going to be very disappointed if there are..... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2016 #60

Also, his arm is too short in that poster. Orrex Jun 2016 #47

He's a mutant. It might just be his birth defect Bucky Jun 2016 #63

Nice post, Winter Soldier. Orrex Jun 2016 #64

In this case... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #51

Hey Buddy, sheshe2 Jun 2016 #69

You are 100% correct... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #71

What would please me... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #133

Are you okay with violence... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #135

Because you didn't answer my question... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #136

Hey Bud. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #138

Sheshe.... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #140

Apparently, female protagonists may only fight female antagonists demwing Jun 2016 #61

Yep, nothing like some good old fashioned girl-on-girl action.... truebrit71 Jun 2016 #174

I am intrigued: how would they want "a gay male being strangled by a hetero" depicted? MisterP Jun 2016 #62

it doesn't help matters the character is shown running around naked through the whole movie Bucky Jun 2016 #65

Putting the poster aside....Are you saying no female character can be harmed? davidn3600 Jun 2016 #68

Whoooosh! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #70

That's because you reached really... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #72

Buddy. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #74

And you are doing the feminist movement a great disservice... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #76

I called people names? sheshe2 Jun 2016 #78

I didn't say "women"...YOU just did. Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #81

Why even bother melman Jun 2016 #112

:( sheshe2 Jun 2016 #134

Indeed, whoosh. So much so that it seems deliberate. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #273

Somebody is always disturbed by something mythology Jun 2016 #75

They're also not using actually blue actors to portray blue characters. Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #79

. Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #82

You mean they're.. *gasp* actors in blue-face?!?? X_Digger Jun 2016 #87

The Blue Man Group was busy. Dr. Strange Jun 2016 #95

Yet another slight for Tobias! opiate69 Jun 2016 #104

... Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #105

Is anybody mad that it happens in the movie? Iggo Jun 2016 #83

Who knows... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #84

The movie is different Bradical79 Jun 2016 #115

Within the whole scene where it happened, it works. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #128

Now that you mention it, I'm disgusted with it too. Sick of it. So pervasive. lostnfound Jun 2016 #85

What would your suggestion be? Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #88

And how would one enact this hypothetical non-encountering of violence in movies? DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2016 #91

I agree... Buddyblazon Jun 2016 #99

Some people thrive on drama. I can do without it. DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2016 #103

Just don't show it as the centerpiece ad. lostnfound Jun 2016 #158

Everything is a trigger warning to the internet. romanic Jun 2016 #89

I'll have you know rolly eyes are my trigger. linuxman Jun 2016 #107

Sorry. romanic Jun 2016 #127

There's a line... TipTok Jun 2016 #231

. linuxman Jun 2016 #106

You missed the point. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #109

Don't know what INL is, linuxman Jun 2016 #116

I meant in real life...... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #121

Then you sure picked a shitty example to talk about it. linuxman Jun 2016 #129

"In a practical sense." sheshe2 Jun 2016 #137

You weren't talking about domestic violence until this post. linuxman Jun 2016 #167

This is what sells ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #108

Sweet lawd! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #117

I know ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #190

Yet melman Jun 2016 #118

What's your point? ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #189

The point is melman Jun 2016 #237

Because you don't show your new villain getting their ass kicked in promotion TheKentuckian Jun 2016 #151

We are talking about an ad for a movie ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #188

... sibelian Jun 2016 #157

And what is the focus here? ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #187

To Kick Ass, Or not to Kick Ass.... snooper2 Jun 2016 #192

True. ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #196

Using an attractive actress... TipTok Jun 2016 #232

what is really sad is DonCoquixote Jun 2016 #130

They are all Panned? LostOne4Ever Jun 2016 #139

Geeze NobodyHere Jun 2016 #142

He's the bad guy in the movie it's supposed to be offensive. craigmatic Jun 2016 #145

They went with a cheap shot, but the entire industry is that way now. Rex Jun 2016 #146

Just imagine if it had been a picture of Spiderwoman's butt strangling her! Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #147

The marvel drawing heard around the world. Rex Jun 2016 #148

Full disclosure: Comics and superheroes, etc. were just never my bag. Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #150

I was more a Piers Anthony nerd then an Xmen nerd. Rex Jun 2016 #212

You're so brave for bringing this up on this board. prayin4rain Jun 2016 #152

"brave" is the new...[insert adjective here] uhnope Jun 2016 #153

It isn't brave. sibelian Jun 2016 #155

Wonder if people are capable of rational thought? or if poutrage is the way of the future? ileus Jun 2016 #154

Good grief... truebrit71 Jun 2016 #160

They know their market SecularMotion Jun 2016 #161

I'm not offended by this at all. Captain Stern Jun 2016 #164

I'd like the OP and the author of this piece to very specifically explain how they imagine a Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #166

Holy shit, which idiot thought this was a good idea? Odin2005 Jun 2016 #168

Oh Jesus S. Christ on a fucking Hoverboard- What stupid idiocy... snooper2 Jun 2016 #175

The irony is the film is very pro-woman. apnu Jun 2016 #177

Good for the movie. The poster is not. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #271

Is Mystique female? Act_of_Reparation Jun 2016 #182

Now *that* is an interesting point ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #193

Anyone that is deeply offended by this is pathetic. DesMoinesDem Jun 2016 #184

Fuck this crap. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #186

You can't demand women be equal combatants and then complain about violence against them. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #194

More over the top people looking for imaginary sexism phleshdef Jun 2016 #199

"Imaginary sexism" ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #202

There is real sexism. Idiots who go off about nothing burgers... phleshdef Jun 2016 #203

And who decides? ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #205

ME. phleshdef Jun 2016 #206

Okey dokey. ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #208

For someone griping about violence against women you have an interesting choice of signature imagery Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #215

My favorite fucking movies ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #218

A movie where a woman fleeing a violent partner is shot through the head. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #220

See that's my favorite fucking scene ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #221

Are you saying, because Beatrix is able to not remain a victim but ultimately gains the upper hand Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #223

I consider it a fable of sorts ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #224

No, what I'm saying is you're protesting the movie in the OP even though Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #227

First, I'm not protesting the movie ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #228

An ad that is trying to show the magnitude of the threat posed by the villain by showing Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #229

WTF??? ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #249

That sounds more like your problem. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #255

I think maybe they need to stop casting women in these kind of movies. hughee99 Jun 2016 #209

It's not fight scenes ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #210

I have not seen "The Hateful Eight" but it sounds like one could make the argument hughee99 Jun 2016 #213

That reality doesn't exist, and is part of the point ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #214

#MutantLivesMatter! Heeeeers Johnny Jun 2016 #222

2 or 3 idiotic bloggers do not = "the internet" TheSarcastinator Jun 2016 #225

Anybody aware of what "the internet" has brought the collective overmind over the past 20 years Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #242

So female super heroes can't fight? Egnever Jun 2016 #233

It's Apocalypse. Arkana Jun 2016 #239

THIRTEEN MORE DAYS! Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #243

20th Century Fox has now apologized for the ad called "casual violence against women." IronLionZion Jun 2016 #241

Thank you. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #244

Thank God, Our Long National Nightmare Is Over. Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #246

Maybe some folks here should just pretend she's a Millennial Bernie Sanders supporter Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #247

For reals opiate69 Jun 2016 #262

Two shitty posts that should have been hidden Orrex Jun 2016 #264

I can't agree with it being offensive due to violence against women... PersonNumber503602 Jun 2016 #250

Well.... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #251

Probably just to console the inconsolable. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #256

When the cost of the apology is balanced against the free publicity generated by the "outrage" Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #257

I have yet to see anything whatsoever that 'the internet' is upset about... Shandris Jun 2016 #254

Thanks for the trigger warning GummyBearz Jun 2016 #258

There is no context in the ad, just a woman getting strangled. Nevernose Jun 2016 #263