Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

larkrake

(1,674 posts)
30. and probably not given antibiotics and hormones
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 10:13 PM
Jun 2016

which leads to breasts in young boys

I will never eat food made in a lab. The only future is vertical farming, hydroponics and free grazing.Any large livestock wont survive if our CA drought extends to the plains, it might be another dustbowl in the future that brings to end to grass fed beef . I have eliminated all but Maine seafood because of Fukishima and BP. What is next?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Monsanto and their practices =/= GMOs. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #1
No matter who the company is, GMO crop drift creates financial havoc for independent farmers who Attorney in Texas Jun 2016 #2
What you said makes no sense. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #3
so why is GMO banned in so many countries? larkrake Jun 2016 #4
As a separate issue, regardless of WHY GMOs are banned, the FACT that they are banned means clean Vote2016 Jun 2016 #5
Wow, so GMO rice causes cross contamination, even though its not commercially available... Humanist_Activist Jun 2016 #11
LOL! Did you not read the "legal issue" discussion at the link YOU posted?!? Vote2016 Jun 2016 #16
I'll admit, I was wrong, but it illustrates the point, those who suffered losses were compensated... Humanist_Activist Jun 2016 #18
You just did something that anti-GMO folks refuse to do. HuckleB Jun 2016 #20
Hell, I've admitted mistakes before, in this case, I read the first paragraph, then linked to it... Humanist_Activist Jun 2016 #22
Oh, I get it. I've deleted a couple of OPs after I learned they were bogus. HuckleB Jun 2016 #23
Eh, many people like their beliefs reinforced, in addition, most hate being wrong... Humanist_Activist Jun 2016 #24
It makes total sense. HuckleB Jun 2016 #25
I totally agree with you on that, the independent farmers are being shanked larkrake Jun 2016 #28
There's not a complete ban in "many" countries. Just a few. GaYellowDawg Jun 2016 #6
No country has banned GMOs. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #37
Do you also oppose labeling of free-range chickens? Vote2016 Jun 2016 #8
I do, its deceptive, they are allowed to lock them up most of the time, let them out for a... Humanist_Activist Jun 2016 #10
Do you also oppose labeling fair-trade coffee? Vote2016 Jun 2016 #13
If its deceptive or not helpful, yes... Humanist_Activist Jun 2016 #14
Do you oppose labeling grass-fed beef too? Vote2016 Jun 2016 #15
Do you not understand the difference between voluntary and mandatory labels? HuckleB Jun 2016 #19
I understand the difference. I just asked a question. Vote2016 Jun 2016 #26
Well, then show it. HuckleB Jun 2016 #33
I don't oppose it, however, there's little difference between grass-fed and grain-fed beef... Humanist_Activist Jun 2016 #21
Do you presume your wisdom on grass-fed beef, free-range chickens, fair-trade coffee is infallible Vote2016 Jun 2016 #27
Of course they can have different opinions, but opinion aren't facts... Humanist_Activist Jun 2016 #29
and probably not given antibiotics and hormones larkrake Jun 2016 #30
I just searched, of the sites I looked at(Mayo clinic, etc.) none of them identified... Humanist_Activist Jun 2016 #32
chemicals made on the cheap mainly, and it is not natural food, nor do I trust labs. larkrake Jun 2016 #34
If you want to label your chicken as free range, that's fine by me. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #36
Agreed on all counts. GaYellowDawg Jun 2016 #7
GMOs are forever banned from our little hilltop in the woods. bvar22 Jun 2016 #9
k&r nationalize the fed Jun 2016 #12
Ah, an anti-GMO shill speaks his "mind." HuckleB Jun 2016 #17
It is profitable to keep the public in the dark. Corporations have time and time again larkrake Jun 2016 #31
You know Latham is a tinfoil hatter right? NobodyHere Jun 2016 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What does the Supreme Cou...»Reply #30