Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: FLORIDA A.G. CEASED INVESTIGATING TRUMP UNIVERSITY AFTER TRUMP DONATED TO HER [View all]Sancho
(9,214 posts)12. "So, here are some hard, cold truths about Bernie Sanders"
https://www.quora.com/What-dirt-is-there-on-Bernie-Sanders
After being elected to Congress, Sanders voted in lock-step with the Democratic Party the vast majority of the time, taking campaign funds from the Democrats and even $10,000 from Hillary Clintons HillPAC. The notion Sanders is just some outsider who refuses to play ball or take tainted money is pure fiction. He takes such money when he wants or needs it. Moreover, his complaints or criticisms of certain funding sources, corporations, and/or ties between government and the corporate world tend to grow silent when his own interests overlap with those funds, corporations, or government-corporate projects.
For example: Sanders had a history of opposing bonuses for Lockheed Martin executives for a while, and his supporters like to point to this example of the Senator standing up to big business and corporate bonuses. The problem is, Sanders very quietly has come around to being a supporter of Lockheed Martin. Theres some shady history involving Sanders denial of being aware of certain deals taking shape between the new Burlington, VT, mayor (recall Burlington is where Sanders got his own start) and Lockheed. Yet somehow, both the Burlington mayor and Senator Sanders were simultaneously working out deals with the company for building and expanding in Vermont. What a nice little coincidence.
For example: Sanders had a history of opposing bonuses for Lockheed Martin executives for a while, and his supporters like to point to this example of the Senator standing up to big business and corporate bonuses. The problem is, Sanders very quietly has come around to being a supporter of Lockheed Martin. Theres some shady history involving Sanders denial of being aware of certain deals taking shape between the new Burlington, VT, mayor (recall Burlington is where Sanders got his own start) and Lockheed. Yet somehow, both the Burlington mayor and Senator Sanders were simultaneously working out deals with the company for building and expanding in Vermont. What a nice little coincidence.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
FLORIDA A.G. CEASED INVESTIGATING TRUMP UNIVERSITY AFTER TRUMP DONATED TO HER [View all]
Sancho
Jun 2016
OP
All the Gulf state AGs at least threatened to come after BP until they were bought off and shut
Dustlawyer
Jun 2016
#22
And people wonder why Bernie supporters are concerned about the MILLIONS in INCOME
think
Jun 2016
#2
If Trump is guilty he should be charged. One shouldn't be allowed to what he did even if he can get
think
Jun 2016
#32
Hillary opposes Glass Steagall and hasn't called out Wall Street fraud. Instead she took their
think
Jun 2016
#11
Hillary supports Dodd Frank and going after shadow bankers, which Bernie is clueless about.
SunSeeker
Jun 2016
#14
Bernie has been addressing the larger issue of too big to fail banks for a long time.
think
Jun 2016
#37
And you're also using the "half truth smear about the CFMA. Good grief you all are so full of it.
think
Jun 2016
#18
Why are you changing the subject of this thread? You do realize you're helping Trump, right?
SunSeeker
Jun 2016
#26
Dodd Frank is the law Sanders cites as giving him the authority to "break up the banks."
SunSeeker
Jun 2016
#57
Soft corruption is legal. And that's probably why Trump probably won't be indicted.
think
Jun 2016
#39
Where did I deflect? I am not against them trying to prosecute Trump. I think even if a quid pro quo
think
Jun 2016
#47
And where is the evidence Hillary has ever made a corrupt decision on banks? n/t
pnwmom
Jun 2016
#54
I like to say that anyone who does't have a little bit of the Devil in him . . .
Jack Rabbit
Jun 2016
#20
Well, it's worked for bank$ter/jihadists these past 8 years, no reason why he couldn't
jtuck004
Jun 2016
#34