Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hiding female cast, 'Ghostbusters' courts male moviegoers [View all]Orrex
(67,141 posts)62. Casino Royale
Also, despite your objection further down, Batman Begins is generally considered a reboot of the horrible Burton-esque films that preceded it. What else could it be? It was a complete change of tone, theme and direction for the character. If that's not a reboot, then what is it?
The Evil Dead reboot is generally considered quite effective, so there's that.
The Hanks/Aykroyd Dragnet was a reboot before reboots were cool. Sure, it's pretty awful in retrospect, but it was successful at the time.
I'm not quite sure what exactly you're considering to be a reboot, since you seem to lump van Sant's Psycho in that category while excluding Batman Begins.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I did laugh more watching that trailer than watching the actual trailer, so there is that.
Travis_0004
Jun 2016
#55
It's really not the fact that the cast is all female that people have a problem with
davidn3600
Jun 2016
#9
Irony is that your phrase accurately describes the criticisms of a movie unseen.
LanternWaste
Jun 2016
#82
First off, Ghostbusters as a brand is not Superman, Spider-Man or Batman
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Jun 2016
#36
Lets put it this way. They couldn't find 2 minutes of good footage to put in the trailer
Travis_0004
Jun 2016
#54
Are you the Executive Producer of this movie or what? Jeez, you seem butthurt. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2016
#65
The first of the new Star Trek films was entertaining as a movie, but shit as Star Trek
Scootaloo
Jun 2016
#32
From the looks of the trailer, they're forming the Ghostbusters company from scratch
jmowreader
Jun 2016
#29
Any "comedy" that uses an "Oooh, that's gonna hurt/leave a mark" joke...
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Jun 2016
#35
Looks like an unoriginal poorly written, cash grab riding the coattails of a classic comedy,
Katashi_itto
Jun 2016
#43
Watching the official trailer, the one with the leads, it just looks BAD.
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2016
#44
I think if they'd remade it with Rogan, Franco, Hill, and Baruchel the reaction would be just as bad
Gidney N Cloyd
Jun 2016
#70
I can't imagine it. And hopefully after his "The Longest Yard" remake, neither can Sandler. :-)
Gidney N Cloyd
Jun 2016
#92