General Discussion

progressoid

(49,945 posts)

26. Nope.

Sun Jun 12, 2016, 01:16 PM

Jun 2016

I don't own a gun but know many people who do. They run the gamut from the occasional hunter (like my Dad, a lifetime member of the Democratic party) to the loony NRA guy (like my former boss who owns an arsenal). And none of them would find your solution reasonable. 2nd amendment notwithstanding.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You can own a 6 shot revolver, and a 2 shot, shot gun. Nothing else. [View all] boston bean Jun 2016 OP

I don't normally reply to these kinds of threads, kentauros Jun 2016 #1

What if you need two bullets to defend your life? ileus Jun 2016 #15

Like I said, I hadn't gotten that far. kentauros Jun 2016 #17

I can go take some lead weights off a car rim in a parking lot and make new bullets. Travis_0004 Jun 2016 #30

You did notice the part where I stated kentauros Jun 2016 #41

You can have 30 minutes in the approved free speech designated zone. Nothing else. linuxman Jun 2016 #2

Apples and pot holes uponit7771 Jun 2016 #4

Seems they are both right there in the bill of rights, but whatever. linuxman Jun 2016 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author Dem2 Jun 2016 #5

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #7

Post was kung-fu edited Dem2 Jun 2016 #9

30 minutes....don't you mean 5 and 2? ileus Jun 2016 #12

If the terrorist would have used his First Amendment as opposed to his Second tallahasseedem Jun 2016 #18

If free speech channels were used to radicalized or inspire killers like this fuck linuxman Jun 2016 #25

Once again, name ONE democratic senator who would support this! Logical Jun 2016 #3

Senator Makebelievy from Indignantrageland. linuxman Jun 2016 #14

I think we need to limit general gun purchases to those two items. roamer65 Jun 2016 #6

Absolutely because you're deader if shot with a semi-auto shadowrider Jun 2016 #33

absolutely ! Angel Martin Jun 2016 #44

Authoritarian horseshit. Odin2005 Jun 2016 #10

No thanks... ileus Jun 2016 #11

You can have a musket MadBadger Jun 2016 #13

How did you hook your printing press to the phone lines? linuxman Jun 2016 #16

No, thanks. Kang Colby Jun 2016 #19

What? liberalnarb Jun 2016 #22

These days revolvers and double barrels arent typical weapons jmg257 Jun 2016 #20

The "militia" purpose of the 2nd Amendment is an irrelevant anachronism; we have the National Guard Spider Jerusalem Jun 2016 #40

That is true. Obsolete yet still laws of the land. jmg257 Jun 2016 #43

i sure as hell wouldn't call one person Takket Jun 2016 #21

Do people actually believe this crap? beevul Jun 2016 #31

Do people actually believe this crap? shadowrider Jun 2016 #34

yeah, people actually believe this "crap". Takket Jun 2016 #35

Uh yes there is. beevul Jun 2016 #38

I'll pass on that Heeeeers Johnny Jun 2016 #23

Hunters going to get hungry One_Life_To_Give Jun 2016 #24

Nope. progressoid Jun 2016 #26

You need to add some rifles to that list. Just limit magazine capacities to a few rounds. dawg Jun 2016 #27

I can go along with that. boston bean Jun 2016 #28

We really need to make it hard for one person to do that much damage. dawg Jun 2016 #29

3d print magazines Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #36

Takes a bit of work. Multiple parts. Spring. Different materials required. dawg Jun 2016 #39

a 6 shot revolver, and a 2 shot, shot gun happynewyear Jun 2016 #32

Or the person Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #37

I'd allow muzzle-loaders and possibly cap-and-ball revolvers Vogon_Glory Jun 2016 #42