Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lancero

(3,002 posts)
79. 150 people shooting around...
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 08:08 PM
Jun 2016

You're a fool if you think that no one will get injured accidently, be it someone being way to confident in their aim and shooting a 'good guy' in the back, some cowboy wannabe shooting themselves in their rush to whip out their gun, or bullets ricocheting all over the place.

It most certainly is. Parents, if you can get your kids out of this country... Barack_America Jun 2016 #1
Isn't Freedumb awesum111111????? Gomez163 Jun 2016 #2
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #3
A fool took his tool(s) and killed 50 people tallahasseedem Jun 2016 #12
Never forget a critical one - WAR n/t malaise Jun 2016 #13
That's LESS practical than limiting the access of weapons designed to kill a lot of humans easily uponit7771 Jun 2016 #18
Welcome to DU IronLionZion Jun 2016 #20
Why not make it harder to get the tools? IronLionZion Jun 2016 #28
Both my sons are gay. mnhtnbb Jun 2016 #4
Sadly you are correct malaise Jun 2016 #8
Just when I think things are getting better for us Aerows Jun 2016 #70
I feel it for all in the LBGT Community malaise Jun 2016 #71
This person lancer78 Jun 2016 #10
American gun policies allowed this nut tallahasseedem Jun 2016 #14
+1 uponit7771 Jun 2016 #19
In one of the recordings of the shooting that I heard, Urchin Jun 2016 #82
Florida prides itself on the machine guns being available. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #91
Yeah, its the magazines/clips and guns that utilize them. DCBob Jun 2016 #5
AMEN!!! Moostache Jun 2016 #43
Sounds good to me. DCBob Jun 2016 #45
I'm a gun owner and safeinOhio Jun 2016 #50
Thanks for a very sane post, siO. nt brer cat Jun 2016 #53
Well said. DCBob Jun 2016 #61
I live in a rural area, in fact I am safeinOhio Jun 2016 #62
Cool. Sounds like an interesting life style. DCBob Jun 2016 #64
I'm a little old for that life style safeinOhio Jun 2016 #72
Yeah, its got to be tough. DCBob Jun 2016 #73
How much good Urchin Jun 2016 #83
I've always said the best home security safeinOhio Jun 2016 #86
Maybe Urchin Jun 2016 #97
How many times does that actually happen? librarylu Jun 2016 #103
The best part of it is safeinOhio Jun 2016 #112
So you limit the capacity of the clips, they'll just carry more clips jack_krass Jun 2016 #87
Restrict all devices that use clips/magazines. DCBob Jun 2016 #93
weapons choices DustyJoe Jun 2016 #6
Yep - I asked that as well malaise Jun 2016 #15
My neighbor asked that, too. Kurovski Jun 2016 #100
And there are so many malaise Jun 2016 #107
That's the important thing... Blanks Jun 2016 #105
Agreed malaise Jun 2016 #108
You can't go into a sporting goods store and buy grenades exboyfil Jun 2016 #54
true DustyJoe Jun 2016 #75
What level of sophistication bighart Jun 2016 #94
bare bones DustyJoe Jun 2016 #95
The amount of time... Blanks Jun 2016 #106
+1000, we obsess and fixate on guns as if they were the root cause, but jack_krass Jun 2016 #88
yep. Dangerous technology *ALWAYS* needs to be regulated as it becomes ever more dangerous Schema Thing Jun 2016 #7
And I can take a 100 pounds lancer78 Jun 2016 #9
True but data suggests that guns are easier to obtain malaise Jun 2016 #11
Good fucking luck buying 100 lbs of fertilizer. joshcryer Jun 2016 #16
How well are guns monitored? IronLionZion Jun 2016 #22
Indeed. joshcryer Jun 2016 #33
My family owns a 320 lancer78 Jun 2016 #25
You'd still be on a more closely monitored list than guns. joshcryer Jun 2016 #31
Sure, they just have to buy a large farm first IronLionZion Jun 2016 #36
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #74
You make the case for the OP, that much fertilizer is harder to get than a weapon DESIGNED to kill uponit7771 Jun 2016 #21
That's why we have mass fertilizer bombings every day in this country. Orrex Jun 2016 #37
So then you are all for stricter gun laws! Thanks! Rex Jun 2016 #49
His claim didn't backfire. HubertHeaver Jun 2016 #66
Yeah, but you wouldn't enjoy it half as much, would you? Dark n Stormy Knight Jun 2016 #90
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #17
Welcome to DU IronLionZion Jun 2016 #23
Its harder to get that much fertilizer than are DESIGNED to kill a lot of people easily uponit7771 Jun 2016 #24
The assault weapon ban was in effect in 1994 BumRushDaShow Jun 2016 #26
So tell us, how many mass killings were there in 1995? How many people in total died A Simple Game Jun 2016 #32
When McVeigh blew up the building BumRushDaShow Jun 2016 #38
+1,000 malaise Jun 2016 #40
You could still buy high-capacity magazines after the ban, they just cost more. PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #104
Yup. The law only affected post-law manufactured product. nt BumRushDaShow Jun 2016 #109
And naturally, since people knew the ban was going to be enacted some time before it was... PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #110
Always happens. BumRushDaShow Jun 2016 #111
Yet sales of AR-15s grew during that period. X_Digger Jun 2016 #39
The law only covered guns sold AFTER the law went into effect BumRushDaShow Jun 2016 #51
And it only applied to 'features'. X_Digger Jun 2016 #55
I recall back in the 80s BumRushDaShow Jun 2016 #59
That is so ridiculous that I can't believe you posted it on purpose. Orrex Jun 2016 #35
Yes and now they watch people more closely that buy fertilizer etc.. can you say the same about guns Rex Jun 2016 #47
Or 140,000, instantly. bvf Jun 2016 #48
It's the twisted person Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #27
Yes, the twisted people who so love their gunz that they block British and Australian type gun laws. Hoyt Jun 2016 #30
Cubana 1976??? malaise Jun 2016 #41
Yes, a plane is a better way to kill MORE, but pockets full of magazines and a properly outfitted Dem2 Jun 2016 #65
Absolutely ridiculous that weapons like this are readily available. CanonRay Jun 2016 #29
They are not military spec Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #34
Cute. Darb Jun 2016 #56
Big f'ing deal. They are designed to kill many in a short time CanonRay Jun 2016 #76
Weapons like what? Urchin Jun 2016 #84
For starters, how about the one this fuckhead used. CanonRay Jun 2016 #89
In other words Urchin Jun 2016 #96
Why don't you quietly return to the NRA forum CanonRay Jun 2016 #102
Exactly Dem2 Jun 2016 #42
The gun humpers are all having a meltdown. They want to pretend we all need the right to own an AR15 Rex Jun 2016 #44
No, that seems to be gun-grabbers lancer78 Jun 2016 #77
Name all the gun grabbers and times and events that guns were grabbed. Rex Jun 2016 #78
this was what blew my mind...people say a knife can kill too.. ellenrr Jun 2016 #46
I cannot process fifty - now fifty nine malaise Jun 2016 #52
well this is what I have been wondering too... ellenrr Jun 2016 #58
Yep malaise Jun 2016 #60
And 150 armed people Urchin Jun 2016 #57
Yes, Armed with bow and arrows not something DESIGNED to kill humans efficiently uponit7771 Jun 2016 #67
One hundred fifty armed people would be a firefight. HubertHeaver Jun 2016 #68
And 250 armed people can all start shooting at each other, in a moments notice. Rex Jun 2016 #69
150 people shooting around... Lancero Jun 2016 #79
Would more than 100 people get injured accidentally Urchin Jun 2016 #81
Not really no Egnever Jun 2016 #113
Yes, it is. passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #63
Guns are the one common denominator in doc03 Jun 2016 #80
i heard earlier on MSNBC that the maximum capacity of the Pulse nightclub was around 300. Calista241 Jun 2016 #85
Yep malaise Jun 2016 #92
Last year we celebrated marriage equality at the pride festivities. Kurovski Jun 2016 #98
Love you back malaise Jun 2016 #99
XOXO Kurovski Jun 2016 #101
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One individual can shoot ...»Reply #79