Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Here's why the government should give you $1,000 a month [View all]
This could work well!
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/raising-the-floor-andy-stern-universal-basic-income-ubi-milton-friedman-social-security-003220195.html
It sounds more like a pipe dream than government policy. Its called Universal Basic Income, a proposed government program that would essentially give every citizen a guaranteed floor income of say $1000 a month from Washington. Its an idea thats been around for a while and has more credibility than you might thinkand not just from left-wingers. Richard Nixon and conservative uber-economist Milton Friedman were both proponents.
So too is Andy Stern, former president of the powerful Service Employees International Union and now a professor at Columbia University. In his new book Raising the Floor, Stern lays out the case for UBI, and he suggests that it isnt some pie-in-the-sky notion that would never see the light of day. I sat down with Stern to discuss.
It is an old idea, Stern points out. Thomas Paine proposed it early on when we were forming the nation.
As for why we need the program, Stern says that at a time when our anti-poverty programs arent really working, and with technology bringing massive job disruption, we need to provide a safety net, a floor for every single American.
UBI isnt socialism, Stern says. Rather its a way to make sure every single American has stability in their life. Stern argues that middle class parents do this with their children, why shouldnt our nation.
So too is Andy Stern, former president of the powerful Service Employees International Union and now a professor at Columbia University. In his new book Raising the Floor, Stern lays out the case for UBI, and he suggests that it isnt some pie-in-the-sky notion that would never see the light of day. I sat down with Stern to discuss.
It is an old idea, Stern points out. Thomas Paine proposed it early on when we were forming the nation.
As for why we need the program, Stern says that at a time when our anti-poverty programs arent really working, and with technology bringing massive job disruption, we need to provide a safety net, a floor for every single American.
UBI isnt socialism, Stern says. Rather its a way to make sure every single American has stability in their life. Stern argues that middle class parents do this with their children, why shouldnt our nation.
26 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hmm. Should be: UBER-conservative Right-only-this-once-economist Milton Friedman. Not as stated. eom
Festivito
Jun 2016
#1
What are you talking about? This is an excellent idea that will be coming as some point.
FighttheFuture
Jun 2016
#5
Some would probably be wrapped into it. Not Social Security, however. This is just to provide a
FighttheFuture
Jun 2016
#6
Yeah, we really do. SS is retirement or disability. This is basic social safety net regardless of
FighttheFuture
Jun 2016
#25
If poor people become less poor as a result of government spending, it's "SOCIALISM!"
closeupready
Jun 2016
#4
Thankfully, Obama is proposing a raise in SS to help people out of poverty.
passiveporcupine
Jun 2016
#19