Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
20. Automatic weapons are already illegal under federal law
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:13 PM
Jun 2016

And have been since the mid-80s. The firearm used in the Orlando attack was a semi-automatic rifle, meaning it fires one round (not multiple rounds) with each trigger pull, and is legal largely everywhere except a handful of states. It is not a military rifle and is functionally similar to most hunting rifles on the market. And semi-automatic rifles are used in only a small percentage of murders when compared to handguns. In reality they aren't any deadlier (and are used in far fewer murders) than a semi-automatic handgun, aside from the fact that they do accept magazines that hold 30 or more rounds. Prior to the Orlando attacks the deadliest mass shooting in the US was the Virginia Tech shootings in 2007, and the gunman there used two semi-automatic pistols. On a state by state basis I think there is little appetite for banning these types of weapons, although we may see a push for banning high-capacity magazines.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

sorry for edits - will change username to types faster than thinks floppyboo Jun 2016 #1
No. That would require legislation, I believe. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #2
The answer to the first question is no, he cannot TeddyR Jun 2016 #3
No. Executive orders only direct how the executive branch enforces a law. NutmegYankee Jun 2016 #4
So, could states one-by-one act more immediately? floppyboo Jun 2016 #6
Yes, states could ban the sale right now. NutmegYankee Jun 2016 #7
There has to be a federal law that applies universally frazzled Jun 2016 #8
It's not that easy. Out-of-state sales have to be shipped to an FFL in-state by federal law. NutmegYankee Jun 2016 #9
The chance of an assault weapons ban TeddyR Jun 2016 #10
If France can pass it we can yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #11
To be clear TeddyR Jun 2016 #12
Federal law trumps state law. France law does work. yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #13
Pretty sure the federal AWB was never challenged in court. These days jmg257 Jun 2016 #17
Oh, I agree that federal law trumps state law TeddyR Jun 2016 #18
Also, the law must written in ways to really it make it worth while... jmg257 Jun 2016 #19
Can you tell us why they would not? What are they thinking? jwirr Jun 2016 #15
Automatic weapons are already illegal under federal law TeddyR Jun 2016 #20
Thank you. I do not pay a lot of attention to this issue and jwirr Jun 2016 #21
No chance Southerncomfy Jun 2016 #5
Zero chance. Kang Colby Jun 2016 #14
I hope any state that figures they have a chance will follow Connecticut nt floppyboo Jun 2016 #16
Forget guns. How about restricting bullets? C_U_L8R Jun 2016 #22
I think there are (at least) two problems TeddyR Jun 2016 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can Obama use his Executi...»Reply #20