Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amishman

(5,927 posts)
15. Since we have had terrorist mass shooters from the following groups can they be banned too?
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 01:17 PM
Jun 2016

republicans
democrats
atheists
christians
muslims
law enforcement
...

The point is that using a small number data points to try and sledgehammer some broad ban into place is not going to go anywhere, and it squanders an opportunity to actually accomplish something.

A reasonable reaction to this would be to reform the terror watch lists (add sorely needed due process and oversight) and link the background check system to it. This is a really reasonable request, and would be very hard for the republicans to block. Part of the reason that we could not get enhanced background checks passed after sandy hook is mostly because of some politicians/groups tried to add less popular bans/restrictions as amendments and muddied up the waters.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No. But we can start an endless number of threads suggesting this. Bonx Jun 2016 #1
Not without legislation. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #2
No. It wouldn't help anyway. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #3
Except for, you know, those situations where they would otherwise have been used to mow down dozens villager Jun 2016 #5
If we implement the 2013 AWB which 'banned AR15s', one could change the grip to be compliant aikoaiko Jun 2016 #6
I suspect the OP is suggesting more than just a grip change. nt villager Jun 2016 #7
Maybe, but I haven't seen any proposed legislation that would accomplish more. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #8
Noting the psychopathology of the political climate is different than saying a ban "wouldn't help," villager Jun 2016 #9
Well the OP said it wanted to ban AR15s and by that I'll stick with saying that it wouldn't help aikoaiko Jun 2016 #10
And I'll stick by saying you can convey your feelings to all the surviving family members... villager Jun 2016 #11
Right becasue I'm sure the grieving family members are wishing their kin had been injured or killed aikoaiko Jun 2016 #12
Ah, so the phrase "anti-gun folks" explains more fully where you're really coming from. nt villager Jun 2016 #13
Playing stupid Dem2 Jun 2016 #17
Keep pluggin away. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #18
Passive supporter of terrorism, eh? A Rovian term if I ever heard of one. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #20
wouldn't hold my breath. niyad Jun 2016 #4
Now is not the time for consistency. eppur_se_muova Jun 2016 #14
Since we have had terrorist mass shooters from the following groups can they be banned too? Amishman Jun 2016 #15
Apples to oranges. KamaAina Jun 2016 #16
you miss the point Amishman Jun 2016 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Now that an AR-15 has bee...»Reply #15