General Discussion

texasmomof3

(108 posts)

53. Yes because guns shoot themselves.

Reply to Botany (Original post)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 08:37 PM

Jun 2016

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

62 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New York Daily News Tells NRA "Thanks" for Worst Mass Shooting in US History [View all] Botany Jun 2016 OP

Here... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #1

thanx Fuck the NRA Botany Jun 2016 #2

In contrast, here's the Post's: Night Watchman Jun 2016 #6

Yellow journalism at its worst. DinahMoeHum Jun 2016 #27

Bullshit rag. It's the NRA against the U.S. nt valerief Jun 2016 #48

Unfortunately, the 2013 Assault Weapons Ban would not have stopped this massacre aikoaiko Jun 2016 #3

Oh, so 'do nothing'. louis-t Jun 2016 #4

My point is that passing an Assault Weapons Ban is actually doing nothing. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #5

Then what, in your opinion, will? justiceischeap Jun 2016 #7

How about we examine more restrictions on the freedom of expression, religion, Marengo Jun 2016 #9

Focus on identification of legitimately prohibited people and the NICS background check aikoaiko Jun 2016 #10

Think there may be a flaw in that. lark Jun 2016 #13

Not really a flaw in what I said. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #16

Ugly as shit ... Jopin Klobe Jun 2016 #18

yes it is and unreliable often aikoaiko Jun 2016 #25

Well, if that ain't phallic, nothing is. Ew. catbyte Jun 2016 #61

It appears more testicular to me, but to each their own. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #62

Stop the cultural poison coming out of mosques, churches, and other radicalizing institutions Jester Messiah Jun 2016 #26

Isn't that what gun humpers want? Do nothing, or pass the weakest laws possible that don't work Feeling the Bern Jun 2016 #50

If laws don't make a difference than why fight against them? Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #14

Because a law that makes no practical difference shouldn't exist. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #19

LOL! You consider owning a gun "liberty"? Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #20

Yes, owning a firearm is a civil liberty protected by the 2nd Amendment. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #21

It was written when the local cops were Redcoats. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #30

Ok, but still it protects civil liberties. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #33

No. Laws do that. Not guns. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #37

Yes, keeping and bearing arms is a civil liberty protected by law (specifically the 2nd amendment). aikoaiko Jun 2016 #40

The Founders didn't believe in maintaining a standing army.... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #44

I dont' think so Wibly Jun 2016 #31

It also says the militia should be "well regulated" and Conservatives are into deregulation. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #35

The Bill of Rights was written in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of govenment powers aikoaiko Jun 2016 #36

First time I've heard of an amendment called a preamble. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #38

There is a preamble to the Bill of Rights which the 2nd Amendment is one. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #39

The Bill of Rights is not part of the Preamble. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #41

Spit you are incorrect. The Bill of Rights is comprised its preamble and 10 amendments. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #43

Do I REALLY need to post the dramatic reading by Shatner? Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #45

We do need to include that in the AWB elljay Jun 2016 #59

Most Americans do. beevul Jun 2016 #24

Actually, most Americans DON'T own guns. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #32

Drop the goalposts. Put them down. beevul Jun 2016 #54

Do you HONESTLY BELIEVE that you owning a gun is protecting MY liberty? Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #55

Who said anything about your liberty? Or protecting it? beevul Jun 2016 #56

Just saw a Gallup poll that shows 55% believe we need stricter gun laws.... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #57

Tl;DR version... MynameisBlarney Jun 2016 #15

And in today's edition, they have this Lonusca Jun 2016 #8

BS, is what I think. lark Jun 2016 #22

thank you, daily news niyad Jun 2016 #11

This is an incredibly true description of what happened and who enabled it. MariaThinks Jun 2016 #12

The Second Amendment was written in the late 1700s ... Jopin Klobe Jun 2016 #17

+1,000,000 lark Jun 2016 #23

Agreed Dem2 Jun 2016 #42

So was the First- does it still apply to Internet postings? friendly_iconoclast Jun 2016 #49

well what you posted is just not correct Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #52

Trump's statement HockeyMom Jun 2016 #28

I agree with the sympathy but Wibly Jun 2016 #29

K&R mcar Jun 2016 #34

Their titles and articles are usually spot on. liberalnarb Jun 2016 #46

You gotta love NY Daily News for making headlines even Fox News viewers can understand. valerief Jun 2016 #47

We should begin referring to the NRA as the many a good man Jun 2016 #51

Yes because guns shoot themselves. texasmomof3 Jun 2016 #53

K & R SunSeeker Jun 2016 #58

it is nice to know DonCoquixote Jun 2016 #60