Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Cables Show Hillary Clinton's State Department Deeply Involved in Trans-Pacific Partnership [View all]
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by LostOne4Ever (a host of the General Discussion forum).
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Thursday attempted to distance herself from the controversial 12-nation trade deal known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership. During her tenure as U.S. secretary of state, Clinton publicly promoted the pact 45 separate times -- but with her Democratic presidential rivals making opposition to the deal a centerpiece of their campaigns, Clinton now asserts she was never involved in the initiative.
"I did not work on TPP," she said after a meeting with leaders of labor unions who oppose the pact. "I advocated for a multinational trade agreement that would 'be the gold standard.' But that was the responsibility of the United States Trade Representative."
But at a congressional hearing in 2011, Clinton told lawmakers that "with respect to the TPP, although the State Department does not have the lead on this -- it is the United States Trade Representative -- we work closely with the USTR." Additionally, State Department cables reviewed by International Business Times show that her agency -- including her top aides -- were deeply involved in the diplomatic deliberations over the trade deal. The cables from 2009 and 2010, which were among a trove of documents disclosed by the website WikiLeaks, also show that the Clinton-run State Department advised the U.S. Trade Representatives office on how to negotiate the deal with foreign government officials.
In recent months, labor, environmental, public health and consumer advocacy groups have campaigned against the TPP, saying the pact is a stealth attempt by corporations to tilt the rules of international commerce in their favor. They have specifically criticized provisions in the deal -- which are secret but have periodically leaked -- that they say would empower corporations to use international tribunals to attempt to overturn public interest laws. The groups represent many core Democratic Party constituencies that Clinton has been courting in her White House bid, which explains why in the lead-up to the party's primary she has suddenly depicted herself as a critic of the deal. But the cables show that the Clinton-run State Department was indeed a major player in pushing the initiative.
"I did not work on TPP," she said after a meeting with leaders of labor unions who oppose the pact. "I advocated for a multinational trade agreement that would 'be the gold standard.' But that was the responsibility of the United States Trade Representative."
But at a congressional hearing in 2011, Clinton told lawmakers that "with respect to the TPP, although the State Department does not have the lead on this -- it is the United States Trade Representative -- we work closely with the USTR." Additionally, State Department cables reviewed by International Business Times show that her agency -- including her top aides -- were deeply involved in the diplomatic deliberations over the trade deal. The cables from 2009 and 2010, which were among a trove of documents disclosed by the website WikiLeaks, also show that the Clinton-run State Department advised the U.S. Trade Representatives office on how to negotiate the deal with foreign government officials.
In recent months, labor, environmental, public health and consumer advocacy groups have campaigned against the TPP, saying the pact is a stealth attempt by corporations to tilt the rules of international commerce in their favor. They have specifically criticized provisions in the deal -- which are secret but have periodically leaked -- that they say would empower corporations to use international tribunals to attempt to overturn public interest laws. The groups represent many core Democratic Party constituencies that Clinton has been courting in her White House bid, which explains why in the lead-up to the party's primary she has suddenly depicted herself as a critic of the deal. But the cables show that the Clinton-run State Department was indeed a major player in pushing the initiative.
THE REST:
http://www.ibtimes.com/cables-show-hillary-clintons-state-department-deeply-involved-trans-pacific-2032948
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cables Show Hillary Clinton's State Department Deeply Involved in Trans-Pacific Partnership [View all]
Triana
Jun 2016
OP
"this site supports the nominee.....PERIOD!" So, facts be damned is your plan?
FailureToCommunicate
Jun 2016
#14
This site, at least until after November becomes an ECHO,Echo echo, CHAMBER, Chamber, chamber!
Dustlawyer
Jun 2016
#36
Actually Skinner will be allowing news pertaining to Clinton, even if it's bad news
Scootaloo
Jun 2016
#27
Wasn't it the job of the State Department to promolgate the policies of the President?
lapucelle
Jun 2016
#2
Americans barely knew/know what TPP IS because it had been kept secret for so long.
Triana
Jun 2016
#7
If it's not a problem why did Hillary run away from these facts during the primary?
Cassiopeia
Jun 2016
#13
Exactly. Why wouldn't the State Department be involved in international trade negotiations?
Midnight Writer
Jun 2016
#31
Backlash Against TPP Grows as Leaked Text Reveals Increased Corp Control of Public Health (2015)
Triana
Jun 2016
#11
Time to get Hillary Clinton and the Democratic party attentive of opposition to TPP
PufPuf23
Jun 2016
#16
Weren't quite a few of the TPP authors also affiliated with the Clinton Foundation?
Ford_Prefect
Jun 2016
#21
Well only for the next 2 days, it seems. After that we will only look forward...
Ford_Prefect
Jun 2016
#28