Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: White House Petition: Ban the AR-15 from Civilian Ownership [View all]spin
(17,493 posts)60. The problem with that idea is that it wouldn't have stopped the massacre...
at the nightclub.
The weapon was not an AR-15, it was a semiautomatic rifle with a much different design known as the Black Mamba.
This Is the Assault Rifle Used by the Orlando Mass Shooter
Developed for US special operations forces, the weapon is known as the "Black Mamba."
MARK FOLLMANJUN. 13, 2016 2:45 PM
Since the Orlando massacre early Sunday morning, pro-gun pundits have come out in force to argue that the weapon used in the attack is not an assault rifle. The gun lobby prefers to call these weapons "modern sporting rifles," euphemistic ammo it can fire in an ongoing semantic debate. But make no mistake: What the Orlando attacker used was a weapon of war. It was designed to kill as many people as possible, as quickly as possible. Witness this harrowing audio captured by a bystander outside the Pulse nightclub in which Omar Mateen fires 24 shots in 9 seconds.
According to a federal law enforcement official, the rifle Mateen used to murder and maim more than 100 people was a Sig Sauer MCX. Mateen legally purchased the weapon, similar to an AR-15, on June 4 in Port St. Lucie, Florida, near where he lived. (He legally purchased a Glock 17 handgun the following day, which he also carried during the attack.)
Sig Sauer bills the MCX as "an innovative weapon system built around a battle-proven core." The company says it "stands as the first rifle to be silenced from the ground up. It also accepts a broad array of accessories, enabling you to build a complete weapon system for any scenario or environment." It has a military-spec trigger and a magazine capacity of 30 rounds. According to the book Guns of Special Forces 2001-2015, the MCX is known in military circles as the "Black Mamba" and was developed at the request of the US Army's special operations forces.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/06/assault-rifle-used-by-orlando-mass-shooter
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What happens when you ban a specific model of weapon, the case of the TEK-9...
PoliticAverse
Jun 2016
#1
Credit where it's due. It would have at least as much impact as the petition to build a Death Star.
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#9
The Assault Weapons Ban wasn't found to be unconstitutional and it banned specific weapon models.
PoliticAverse
Jun 2016
#5
Assume a Democrat is elected and appoints a liberal replacement for Scalia. Do you think the newly
PoliticAverse
Jun 2016
#13
Indeed. As Heller was a 5-4 decision a liberal justice replacing Scalia could swing the court
PoliticAverse
Jun 2016
#14
Just signed. Even if this may be pointless, it sends a message to some in congress and the senate.
Laser102
Jun 2016
#23
At this point it would be like trying to ban human slaves from civilian ownership
IronLionZion
Jun 2016
#26
I must have misunderstood your post, I thought you were answering for yourself...
Marengo
Jun 2016
#72
No, just people who buy devices DESIGNED to kill a lot of humans relatively efficiently
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#75
I'm sure many confederates owned several slaves without mistreating any of them
IronLionZion
Jun 2016
#42
You have the ability to kill a lot of people efficiently relatively speaking though
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#70
Strawman, I said devices I could care less what they are if its designed to kill a lot of humans...
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#78
I have faith in people just not wackos, that's the difference between us... I want a high filter
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#80
I disagree with the NRA and punk ass'd legislators on that account, it''s not long or difficult ...
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#82
Strawman, didn't say they did... I said regulations... I'm correct and right on that account
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#86
Well, when everyone I know who does competition says it's crap, I'm going with that.
HuckleB
Jun 2016
#98
Bullshit amateur psychoanalysis aside, that's the elephant in the room for confiscation advocates.
Lizzie Poppet
Jun 2016
#58
Now if only we cound get someone on board for the mental help programs being proposed right now...
Matt_R
Jun 2016
#115
Yeah, there will be violent resistance ... some harsh language... obscene gestures and pictures...
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#71
What we need is a new constitutional amendment to repeal the 2A and ban all guns.
LonePirate
Jun 2016
#31
Exactly! The real problem is that people have guns. That's why gun violence rates are so high in
hughee99
Jun 2016
#96
A vague law is a bad law; it's unenforceable. Our laws rely on precision of language. But when
Brickbat
Jun 2016
#36
I see opinion and no resolve to have anything other than having an opinion. eom
Festivito
Jun 2016
#111
