Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Can we as a party please come up with a better idea than the AWB? [View all]spin
(17,493 posts)44. That may sound like a reasonable idea. ...
The problem is to first get the law through Congress. The last attempt to pass a new federal assault weapons ban after Sandy Hook couldn't even pass in a Senate controlled by Democrats.
The next problem is how to enforce this ban. Many gun friendly states would simply ignore the law and not require firearms to be turned in or confiscated just like some states ignore the federal laws on marijuana.
Under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) of 1970, marijuana is classified as a Schedule I substance. By definition, Schedule I drugs have a high potential for abuse and dependency, with no recognized medical use or value. Any marijuana possession, cultivation, or use is a federal crime, subjecting a defendant to fines, prison time, or both. Large scale cultivation and trafficking (transporting or selling marijuana, often across state lines) incurs harsher penalties, and tends to be the main focus of federal drug enforcement attention.
In spite of this wholesale federal ban, since the mid-1990s 18 states have enacted laws that allow or protect the medicinal use of marijuana. Most of these states have decriminalized medicinal marijuana use (removed the risk of criminal prosecution and penalties) for patients who follow the law with respect to amounts, registration, and so on. State-level penalties still apply to those who break these state laws.
http://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/criminal-defense/federal-crime/medical-marijuana-federal-laws.htm
While many gun owners would voluntarily turn in their semi automatic firearms a percentage would not. Attempts to confiscate their weapons could lead to violence and armed standoffs with media coverage. If the police were to use force that resulted in bloodshed it would only fire up other "patriots" to defend their Second Amendment rights which would result in even more bloodshed. It might even cause armed terrorist style attacks on our infrastructure. It's not all that difficult to take down major power lines, rip up railroad tracks or blow up the supports for freeway bridges.
It is even conceivable that some states might secede from the union. Sending in armed troops to quell the rebellion would result in even more violence and bloodshed even if successful. A number of states such as Texas already have secessionist movements.
The simple fact is that a high percentage of our citizens no longer trust our federal government enough to turn in their weapons.
Plus you only suggesting banning all semi-automatic long arms with the exception of .22LR. It may be even easier to massacre a large number of people with a couple of easier to conceal semi-automatic pistols. If you successfully managed to ban and confiscate ALL semi-automatic firearms it is still possible to fill a bag with revolvers and when one runs out of bullets to simply grab another one.
In my opinion all too often reality is the biggest enemy of good ideas.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's not the same thing. It has a different cycling system, which makes it completely different.
Calista241
Jun 2016
#21
You know the spread pattern at a specific range but you're not a fetishist?
cleanhippie
Jun 2016
#68
Since you're arguing with straw men of your own curious creation, that doesn't exactly sadden me.
Lizzie Poppet
Jun 2016
#61
Considering that your response was "LOL" you're lucky I didn't tell you to go fuck yourself (n/t)
Spider Jerusalem
Jun 2016
#62
You will grant, I presume, that your proposal or one like it hasn't the slightest chance of actually
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#57
Did you think this was funny when you were writing it? How about now? Do you think it's funny now?
Squinch
Jun 2016
#33
That would address the issue but I don't think it is winnable even with a Dem WH and Congress
aikoaiko
Jun 2016
#14
Bills regulating firearms should directly address the amount of hot lead that comes out the barrel.
backscatter712
Jun 2016
#8
OK, but the curve can be bent here. Ban manufacture and import of semi's without fixed magazines
Recursion
Jun 2016
#12
As you point out, there are already a lot of magazines out there. Hundreds of millions at least.
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#17