Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Apparently the shooter didn't use an AR-15. CJCRANE Jun 2016 #1
All the articles I have read that named a weapon have said AR-15. Thor_MN Jun 2016 #6
Nope Abq_Sarah Jun 2016 #7
I looked it up, practically the same thing Amishman Jun 2016 #13
It's not the same thing. It has a different cycling system, which makes it completely different. Calista241 Jun 2016 #21
Not quite 100% different PJMcK Jun 2016 #40
They're both firearms but they're not the same thing Abq_Sarah Jun 2016 #22
The AR 15 started out as a Colt brand name. Its now a generic name Gomez163 Jun 2016 #26
Armalite Rifle SpookyDem Jun 2016 #51
Better idea: Spider Jerusalem Jun 2016 #2
^^^^^ THIS ^^^^^ madinmaryland Jun 2016 #23
Not going to happen. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #28
No, because the USA has too many fuckwits. Spider Jerusalem Jun 2016 #30
More prosaic is the fact nearly 100,000,000 American possess firearms. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #64
What makes a shotgun better for home defense, in your opinion? linuxman Jun 2016 #38
Than an AR-15? Spider Jerusalem Jun 2016 #41
You don't have to aim a shotgun? linuxman Jun 2016 #42
four inch spread at 12 feet vs...none Spider Jerusalem Jun 2016 #45
Nice, lackadaisical attitude you have to lethal weapons there. linuxman Jun 2016 #60
You know the spread pattern at a specific range but you're not a fetishist? cleanhippie Jun 2016 #68
That may sound like a reasonable idea. ... spin Jun 2016 #44
You should read more closely Spider Jerusalem Jun 2016 #46
Yes...that would be TOTALLY enforceable! Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #48
Oh, look, another gun fetishist! Spider Jerusalem Jun 2016 #50
Oh, look, a grade-schooler! Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #53
Sorry, but I don't see much reason to engage you seriously. Spider Jerusalem Jun 2016 #56
Since you're arguing with straw men of your own curious creation, that doesn't exactly sadden me. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #61
Considering that your response was "LOL" you're lucky I didn't tell you to go fuck yourself (n/t) Spider Jerusalem Jun 2016 #62
Lucky? Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #65
How civil of you Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #67
Try to get a law like that through Congress. Your chances would be less ... spin Jun 2016 #49
You will grant, I presume, that your proposal or one like it hasn't the slightest chance of actually Just reading posts Jun 2016 #57
That depends on how much of a drag on the GOP ticket Trump is, no? Spider Jerusalem Jun 2016 #59
Can we as a party come up with a better idea than the... Ferretherder Jun 2016 #3
Did you think this was funny when you were writing it? How about now? Do you think it's funny now? Squinch Jun 2016 #33
Repeal 2A Jerry442 Jun 2016 #4
... Crepuscular Jun 2016 #31
I dont think very many people will understand what you are trying to say. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #5
Maybe that's where we should go. backscatter712 Jun 2016 #9
I'm down with that, personally (I'd imagine the poster above is not) Recursion Jun 2016 #11
That would address the issue but I don't think it is winnable even with a Dem WH and Congress aikoaiko Jun 2016 #14
so it's ok Crepuscular Jun 2016 #32
You obviously have reading comprehension problems. backscatter712 Jun 2016 #37
Bills regulating firearms should directly address the amount of hot lead that comes out the barrel. backscatter712 Jun 2016 #8
I can fire ten rounds accurately in ten seconds using two six shot revolvers. spin Jun 2016 #47
I'm always amused at the pie in the sky wishes for bans Lee-Lee Jun 2016 #10
OK, but the curve can be bent here. Ban manufacture and import of semi's without fixed magazines Recursion Jun 2016 #12
Once again- how are you enforcing it? Lee-Lee Jun 2016 #18
An import ban? Customs Recursion Jun 2016 #20
On what grounds Crepuscular Jun 2016 #35
One huge problem: 3D printers. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #58
Very true Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #66
Depends what we want whatthehey Jun 2016 #15
Magazine capacity is where it is DVRacer Jun 2016 #16
As you point out, there are already a lot of magazines out there. Hundreds of millions at least. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #17
And they can be 3D printed now Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #54
Yup. That genie's not getting back in the bottle. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #55
Or at least something other than nothing. Iggo Jun 2016 #19
First of all would it be a real ban this time? ileus Jun 2016 #24
FWIW, I think magazines are the place to start Adrahil Jun 2016 #25
Symbollic victories in culture war seem more important. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #27
It's not a symbolic victory Aerows Jun 2016 #34
Seems reasonable to you, but it won't stop mass murder... Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #63
I've said this before, and I'll say it again. Aerows Jun 2016 #29
... Crepuscular Jun 2016 #36
Meaningless rhetoric Aerows Jun 2016 #39
Had your statement Crepuscular Jun 2016 #43
What, pray tell, is the matter with Average White Band? KamaAina Jun 2016 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can we as a party please ...»Reply #66