Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

2naSalit

(103,067 posts)

14. It would be

Reply to closeupready (Reply #13)

Wed Jun 15, 2016, 10:54 AM

Jun 2016

poetic justice if that happened while the next group of imbeciles try climbing them and they win the Darwin Award. And if their survivors try to sue, they should be counter sued.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

California woman vandalized national parks [View all] left-of-center2012 Jun 2016 OP

well she might have had a shot if her art was not so ugly and annoying. hollysmom Jun 2016 #1

zero shot those are National Parks and belong to my grandchildren NoMoreRepugs Jun 2016 #5

I'm hoping it's not that expensive/difficult, and that the parks MH1 Jun 2016 #31

acrylic paint is very hard to remove. (no text) Quantess Jun 2016 #42

Banksey or Rembrandt should get the same sentence (though hers was a bit on the light side). nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #16

except Banksy paints on man made objects usually not so pretty and Rembrandt painted on contract. hollysmom Jun 2016 #18

Of course. Replied to NoMoreRepugs who said merit of the artwork should count to the sentence. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #19

Too bad she didn't get some jail time - TheCowsCameHome Jun 2016 #2

White privilege? jalan48 Jun 2016 #4

young semi-pretty woman privilege snooper2 Jun 2016 #9

Both! 2naSalit Jun 2016 #12

Yup. Those arches are going to collapse. You watch. closeupready Jun 2016 #13

It would be 2naSalit Jun 2016 #14

Look at me! Raster Jun 2016 #3

Who the Hell did this woman think she was? TNNurse Jun 2016 #6

Christo? KansDem Jun 2016 #11

but then he takes it down,only temporary. hollysmom Jun 2016 #15

Enormous homegirl Jun 2016 #21

point is, private land, with permission. niyad Jun 2016 #23

Christo's art is ephemeral, not permanent. Nitram Jun 2016 #34

I hope everyone protests with the same strength when corporations Perseus Jun 2016 #7

textbook narcissist nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #8

Deport her immediately! IronLionZion Jun 2016 #10

Homegirl? homegirl Jun 2016 #22

Sup homegirl! IronLionZion Jun 2016 #38

Here's a previous DU discussion of the matter Orrex Jun 2016 #17

She ought to have been jailed. These defacement are massive. What a jerk! shambolic Jun 2016 #20

Should have been a year in jail for every charge bigwillq Jun 2016 #24

Take Her To Prison scottie55 Jun 2016 #25

A more detailed article from Modern Hiker kiva Jun 2016 #26

Includes pics of pre- and post-cleanup klook Jun 2016 #32

I don't get it either. kiva Jun 2016 #39

I wait for the day that murdering the wolves and bears who use those habitats also brings a sentence villager Jun 2016 #27

Wow... deathrind Jun 2016 #28

Her sentence should include cleaning up other idiot's graffiti for years...NT vkkv Jun 2016 #29

she also has to pay for the cleanup and it's non-dischargeable by bankruptcy magical thyme Jun 2016 #30

Millennials. Their Instagram and Twitter fame are greater than our national treasures. TeamPooka Jun 2016 #33

Now, now. You can't blame an entire generation for the sin of one idiot. Nitram Jun 2016 #35

I blame the Kardashians. nt TeamPooka Jun 2016 #36

With that, I could go along. Nitram Jun 2016 #37

If her crap is art, Mendocino Jun 2016 #40

That's why the lord made sketchbooks, doofus. Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #41

Idiot. Throw the book at her! SunSeeker Jun 2016 #43