Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
12. That is an EXTREMELY ableist rule.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 10:23 PM
Jun 2016

What about someone in a wheelchair? Someone with arthritis?

I have arthritis in both my knees. No way I could stand for more than an hour without intense pain.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Can he sit while a colleague is "asking a question"? brooklynite Jun 2016 #1
No charlyvi Jun 2016 #5
Kick Quackers Jun 2016 #2
I thought everybody here was against filibusters Travis_0004 Jun 2016 #3
Republicans are in power oberliner Jun 2016 #8
We are against virtual filibusters. charlyvi Jun 2016 #9
+1 dchill Jun 2016 #42
Actual filibusters are fine. Iggo Jun 2016 #13
And unlike the virtual kind almost always fail. n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #14
I like that they're trying, rather than babylonsister Jun 2016 #37
But if they want to actually block the legislation they're filibustering they can just do so. PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #38
We get it. You're a gunner. HERVEPA Jun 2016 #30
You beat me to it. Gun huggers are so easy to spot these days Feeling the Bern Jun 2016 #47
If they are going to stand and actually filibuster, no problem. AllyCat Jun 2016 #31
few oppose all filibusters. Most oppose the ABUSE of the filibuster. NYC Liberal Jun 2016 #34
I thought senators didn't even have to speak for a filibuster. They just needed 60 votes valerief Jun 2016 #4
That's how the Dems give republicans permission to fillibuster. arcane1 Jun 2016 #7
So Murphy can sit down? Pee? nt valerief Jun 2016 #18
No charlyvi Jun 2016 #27
How come GOP senators who filibuster don't even hate to talk and Murphy can't even sit? nt valerief Jun 2016 #28
Because if one party has 60 votes charlyvi Jun 2016 #32
Yeah, I remember Bernie's 8.5 hour filibuster on the Bush tax cuts in 2010. valerief Jun 2016 #35
They do need 60 votes. joshcryer Jun 2016 #48
It's a waste of time davidn3600 Jun 2016 #6
Probably charlyvi Jun 2016 #11
It isn't. But feel free to take your support to the naysayers. AllyCat Jun 2016 #33
Publicity stunt. n/t Kang Colby Jun 2016 #10
That is an EXTREMELY ableist rule. Adrahil Jun 2016 #12
Most likely you would not filibuster yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #15
That's not acceptable, IMO. NT Adrahil Jun 2016 #19
Maybe not but that's the rules. yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #24
No, it's not... Chan790 Jun 2016 #43
agreed. nt Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #16
Indeed. n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #17
Either Kerrey or Cleland asked for a ruling at one point Recursion Jun 2016 #21
OK I tried to find an answer to this but couldn't charlyvi Jun 2016 #23
I would hope some accommodation could be found. NT Adrahil Jun 2016 #26
Except SwankyXomb Jun 2016 #36
Does the ADA apply to the Senate? Mariana Jun 2016 #40
From... PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #46
Wendy Davis is my Hero. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author k8conant Jun 2016 #22
The Republicans do not want a vote on gun control, it will point out their inability to dodge doing Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #25
Bernie filibustered for 8 hours over the sequester agreement Arazi Jun 2016 #29
That didn't count because Hillary supporters hate Bernie Doctor_J Jun 2016 #41
Sounds like the Senate needs an ADA compliance inspection Bucky Jun 2016 #39
Congress exampted itself from the ADA. Chan790 Jun 2016 #44
Murphy's my guy. Glad I can vote for a great man. lindysalsagal Jun 2016 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A filibustering senator c...»Reply #12