Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Guns should be registered like cars. [View all]cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)31. Oh you bet the NRA will be writing policies, post haste.
They'll offer it dirt cheap to all their members, and in so doing begin a self-perpetuating circle. People will join because they'll want the insurance. And the insurance will fund membership drives. They'll probably even offer safes with their policies, just so they can discount the policies.
And guess why they'll be more than happy to do it. Because their members new and old will be forced into their memberships, and the NRA knows very few, statistically almost none of their members will ever need to use the insurance you'll impose on them. Other insurance companies will either get into the business, or want to underwrite the NRA's policies so they can share in the pie.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't have to have a license,register or insure my car. Only if I want to take it on public roads.
X_Digger
Jun 2016
#4
*I* am registered with my state. SO 50 state reciprocity is cool with you, now?
X_Digger
Jun 2016
#14
Registration would cost about 4 billion a year and insurnace would make the NRA rich
Lee-Lee
Jun 2016
#5
There's no constitutional right to have devices that are designed to kill humans efficiently
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#57
But the founding fathers didn't include any amendment in the Bill of Rights mentioning automobiles.
tclambert
Jun 2016
#15
Absolutely. And, I think even Scalia himself wrote in the Hellier ruling that...
TrollBuster9090
Jun 2016
#16
Cars aren't a constitutional right. But you knew that before you posted such drivel.
cleanhippie
Jun 2016
#17
You don't need a license or insurance to keep and drive a car on private property
hack89
Jun 2016
#44