Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Guns: A proposed compromise [View all]Straw Man
(6,946 posts)71. They are not the issuing authority.
No, you harass state lawmakers until they give you what you want...
just to get you stop calling them over and over in great multitudes.
just to get you stop calling them over and over in great multitudes.
State legistlators make the laws. You're talking about administration and enforcement.
May-issue is at the discretion of the issuing authority, which in Maryland is the Department of Public Safety. If a state legislator is making judgements or exerting influence on who does and doesn't get a permit, then there's some serious malfeasance going on.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No weapons of war? So a single shot Springfield 1873 rifle is verboten?
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#8
I only count only two, arguably one. Silencers and SBRS, both of which arguably fall under the same
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#7
Sure I compromised. I propose giving your side Universal Backgound Checks in return for NFA reform.
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#13
Currently CT...which is may issue. (Though they refuse recognition of any other state.)
Chan790
Jun 2016
#66
So the rules regarding rifles and shotguns remain the same, but semiauto handguns are outlawed?
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#23
But we could still have semiauto "assault weapons"? You did say rifles and shotguns were allowed.
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#28
Sounds like you want us to go to (roughly) Australia's level of gun control.
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#35
But in Canada you're allowed to own semiautomatic handguns, as well as some "evil black rifles".
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#46
I would be negotiable if the backgrounding process for those classes were even more rigorous.
roamer65
Jun 2016
#51
I think I'd be giving away more than I got. CCW is becoming the norm already.
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#26
I don't expect the West Coast or Northeast to respect gun rights any time in the foreseeable future.
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#36
This is what a real compromise would look like, as opposed to someone saying that their "compromise"
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#42
I thought I had all the ammosexuals on my Forever Ignored club. I missed you! nt
valerief
Jun 2016
#39
And you kicked the thread just to tell me that? That's so sweet.....
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#43