Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

SunSeeker

(58,283 posts)

43. Idiot. Throw the book at her!

Reply to left-of-center2012 (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 03:39 AM

Jun 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

California woman vandalized national parks [View all] left-of-center2012 Jun 2016 OP

well she might have had a shot if her art was not so ugly and annoying. hollysmom Jun 2016 #1

zero shot those are National Parks and belong to my grandchildren NoMoreRepugs Jun 2016 #5

I'm hoping it's not that expensive/difficult, and that the parks MH1 Jun 2016 #31

acrylic paint is very hard to remove. (no text) Quantess Jun 2016 #42

Banksey or Rembrandt should get the same sentence (though hers was a bit on the light side). nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #16

except Banksy paints on man made objects usually not so pretty and Rembrandt painted on contract. hollysmom Jun 2016 #18

Of course. Replied to NoMoreRepugs who said merit of the artwork should count to the sentence. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #19

Too bad she didn't get some jail time - TheCowsCameHome Jun 2016 #2

White privilege? jalan48 Jun 2016 #4

young semi-pretty woman privilege snooper2 Jun 2016 #9

Both! 2naSalit Jun 2016 #12

Yup. Those arches are going to collapse. You watch. closeupready Jun 2016 #13

It would be 2naSalit Jun 2016 #14

Look at me! Raster Jun 2016 #3

Who the Hell did this woman think she was? TNNurse Jun 2016 #6

Christo? KansDem Jun 2016 #11

but then he takes it down,only temporary. hollysmom Jun 2016 #15

Enormous homegirl Jun 2016 #21

point is, private land, with permission. niyad Jun 2016 #23

Christo's art is ephemeral, not permanent. Nitram Jun 2016 #34

I hope everyone protests with the same strength when corporations Perseus Jun 2016 #7

textbook narcissist nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #8

Deport her immediately! IronLionZion Jun 2016 #10

Homegirl? homegirl Jun 2016 #22

Sup homegirl! IronLionZion Jun 2016 #38

Here's a previous DU discussion of the matter Orrex Jun 2016 #17

She ought to have been jailed. These defacement are massive. What a jerk! shambolic Jun 2016 #20

Should have been a year in jail for every charge bigwillq Jun 2016 #24

Take Her To Prison scottie55 Jun 2016 #25

A more detailed article from Modern Hiker kiva Jun 2016 #26

Includes pics of pre- and post-cleanup klook Jun 2016 #32

I don't get it either. kiva Jun 2016 #39

I wait for the day that murdering the wolves and bears who use those habitats also brings a sentence villager Jun 2016 #27

Wow... deathrind Jun 2016 #28

Her sentence should include cleaning up other idiot's graffiti for years...NT vkkv Jun 2016 #29

she also has to pay for the cleanup and it's non-dischargeable by bankruptcy magical thyme Jun 2016 #30

Millennials. Their Instagram and Twitter fame are greater than our national treasures. TeamPooka Jun 2016 #33

Now, now. You can't blame an entire generation for the sin of one idiot. Nitram Jun 2016 #35

I blame the Kardashians. nt TeamPooka Jun 2016 #36

With that, I could go along. Nitram Jun 2016 #37

If her crap is art, Mendocino Jun 2016 #40

That's why the lord made sketchbooks, doofus. Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #41

Idiot. Throw the book at her! SunSeeker Jun 2016 #43