Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

reign88

(64 posts)
62. I guess the refute would be
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 12:05 PM
Jun 2016

people are free to do what they want with their own money. They can be responsible with it, or not responsible with it. Otherwise say goodbye to all of Hollywood and E Network.

If you were lending money to someone directly who kept asking for loans, and they kept spending it on drugs, would you keep giving them the money?

I mean, if I have a friend who keeps borrowing money from me and squandering it, I'm going to stop lending money to him at some point. For some reason though when the picture gets bigger, and it become a governmental program lending tax dollars, our view of the problem becomes different.

I'm not necessarily for drug testing welfare recipients, but I definitely can understand the motivation behind it. Make no mistake: a drug addict in poverty is going to die or end up in jail in the majority of cases. Plus, if I am struggling to pay bills or save money, I cut back on the non-necessities as best I can. I definitely would include recreational drugs as a non-necessity.

This is a good one!!!!! tonyt53 Jun 2016 #1
Yes! Fantastic idea....LOVE it! InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #53
K&R n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #2
Every elected official should be drug tested Fresh_Start Jun 2016 #3
Sounds good to me. TryLogic Jun 2016 #9
a blood test and breathalyzer azureblue Jun 2016 #44
No one should, really. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #46
Hell with that. I think they should be required to do a bowl Amimnoch Jun 2016 #55
Yes, they'd still be tested, though klook Jun 2016 #56
LOL, fair enough ;). Eom Amimnoch Jun 2016 #69
They should be drug tested and thrown out if the results aren't positive Major Nikon Jun 2016 #58
Good one! LisaM Jun 2016 #4
LOL. Nice. Iggo Jun 2016 #5
I approve of this message rurallib Jun 2016 #6
I'd like to know what medication tRump is on. He should be using *something* (and he's rich). . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #7
I think he likes the snow too much azureblue Jun 2016 #45
He doesn't even drink... scscholar Jun 2016 #52
I didn't post an example. I know he doesn't drink. I think his body is making him slightly psychotic Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #54
KICK!! Now that is some Karma felix_numinous Jun 2016 #8
Um. No. Bad idea. phazed0 Jun 2016 #10
uh, hello, don't you think that is really her point? elljay Jun 2016 #11
Would rather have seen it presented as such.. phazed0 Jun 2016 #14
and how would it "actually pass"? annabanana Jun 2016 #16
Agreed. phazed0 Jun 2016 #17
Did you just fall off the truck? You are wanting to go back to the way it used to be, before jtuck004 Jun 2016 #63
"If we want to test people who are doing drugs" phazed0 Jun 2016 #64
The problem is no one cares, really, what you want. Or any of us. That's old jtuck004 Jun 2016 #67
K&R!!! 2naSalit Jun 2016 #12
And Drug Test Bank CEO's Urchin Jun 2016 #13
This too, and mandatory, annual and independent psychological evalutions for both. appalachiablue Jun 2016 #19
now you're talkin!!!!!! spanone Jun 2016 #15
GREAT idea IMO. Triana Jun 2016 #18
Don't forget to test for the 3 martini lunch! AlbertCat Jun 2016 #20
While I do see the point she's trying to make bluestateguy Jun 2016 #21
That's a good point treestar Jun 2016 #29
A drug test to keep your own money? DesMoinesDem Jun 2016 #22
Yes they are different, but is it just, to not pay your fair share? The Wielding Truth Jun 2016 #23
How is it not paying your fair share? DesMoinesDem Jun 2016 #32
I think that she is using this measure to call attention to inequality. Drug testing the rich is a The Wielding Truth Jun 2016 #35
Nope. sulphurdunn Jun 2016 #25
That makes no sense. DesMoinesDem Jun 2016 #33
You are correct. It is not an argument, sulphurdunn Jun 2016 #36
tax write offs treestar Jun 2016 #28
The government needs to make sure people with money are responsible and not on drugs? DesMoinesDem Jun 2016 #34
what's wrong with it? treestar Jun 2016 #37
I guess the refute would be reign88 Jun 2016 #62
Drugged rich people might mess up their exemptions! leftstreet Jun 2016 #39
Playing semantics SpankMe Jun 2016 #68
What if the person is a legal medicinal marijuana user? bluestateguy Jun 2016 #24
Last I heard marijuana is still Schedule I drug... Matt_R Jun 2016 #50
drug test the people who start wars and crash the eonomy Skittles Jun 2016 #26
I love it! treestar Jun 2016 #27
Amen Tsiyu Jun 2016 #30
This ^^^ n/t lordsummerisle Jun 2016 #43
Love it! choie Jun 2016 #31
I would like to see that the police are drug tested on a regular basis. pennylane100 Jun 2016 #38
May I add a breathalizer test at the beginning and end of a shift. n/t Matt_R Jun 2016 #51
Great! Most people who receive benefits are powerless. Chemisse Jun 2016 #40
Yes, please. Beartracks Jun 2016 #41
BWAAAAAAHHHHHHH! SusanCalvin Jun 2016 #42
always liked that one. niyad Jun 2016 #48
k and r. LOVE IT. would also require all upper management in all MIC and corporate offices to niyad Jun 2016 #47
Just SO RIGHT. ( nt) maddiemom Jun 2016 #49
Gwen Moore you are awesome!! n/t zazen Jun 2016 #57
She is my Congresscritter mysuzuki2 Jun 2016 #59
I think ALL elected Government officials should be subjected to routine, surprise drug tests. NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #60
Hey.. I know... let's penalize ALL achievement. nt clarice Jun 2016 #61
. demmiblue Jun 2016 #66
Lol... nice! demmiblue Jun 2016 #65
Those who can afford drugs might use them bucolic_frolic Jun 2016 #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Congresswoman Who Used To...»Reply #62