Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 20 years of data show Austrailias gun control laws work [View all]friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)342. I see you're sticking with the demagoguery schtick, and adding misrepresentation (or ignorance)
Judging from your bile-filled replies, you seem to have gotten the erroneous notion that
"disagreeing with Darb" = "allying with the NRA".
It seems all that self-righteous anger has fucked up your research skills-
I was dissing the NRA at DU years before you even blew in here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=57629
My "buddies" at the NRA? No James Randi money for you- I think of them almost as poorly as you do.
And have said so more than once:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117222584
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117250142#post163
So what is it, Hoyt? Poor research skills or deliberate falsehood on your part?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117222584
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117250142#post163
So what is it, Hoyt? Poor research skills or deliberate falsehood on your part?
Here's my reply to another self-appointed zampolit that tried the same routine:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=53805
And again, pointing out *your* specious claim is not a defense of *them*. A pox on both your houses!
-*The NRA* for becoming (as I said before) a hypocritical right-wing political movement with a bitchin' gun club...
-*You* for trying to spread faith-promoting rumor and slandering a fellow DUer when called on it. You don't like the NRA? Fine- but hate them for real reasons instead of some half baked CT.
-*The NRA* for becoming (as I said before) a hypocritical right-wing political movement with a bitchin' gun club...
-*You* for trying to spread faith-promoting rumor and slandering a fellow DUer when called on it. You don't like the NRA? Fine- but hate them for real reasons instead of some half baked CT.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172116375
I like the term "National Republican Armory". Feel free to use it!
'Allies' with the Republicans? Horseshit:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=51231
You distort the true history of Rosa Parks and of the civil rights movement in general.
Not that such revisionism is anything new:
http://www.onthemedia.org/2010/aug/27/tabula-rosa/transcript/
BOB GARFIELD: In that same Washington Post obituary there was, it seemed, a palpable sense of disappointment that the myth is, in fact, a myth. Why are we so reluctant to let it go? TIM TYSON: There's a sense in which Mrs. Parks is very important to our post-civil rights racial narrative, because we really want a kind of sugar-coated civil rights movement that's about purity and interracial non-violence. And so we don't really want to meet the real Rosa Parks. We don't, for example, want to know that in the late 1960s, Rosa Parks became a black nationalist and a great admirer of Malcolm X. I met Rosa Parks at the funeral of Robert F. Williams, who had fought the Ku Klux Klan in North Carolina with a machine gun in the late 1950s and then fled to Cuba, and had been a kind of international revolutionary icon of black power. Ms. Parks delivered the eulogy at his funeral. She talks in her autobiography and says that she never believed in non-violence and that she was incapable of that herself, and that she kept guns in her home to protect her family. But we want a little old lady with tired feet. You may have noticed we don't have a lot of pacifist white heroes. We prefer our black people meek and mild, I think.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php/http:/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x337407#337605
14. More on Timothy Tyson, Robert F. Williams, and armed African-Americans:
Edited on Tue Aug-31-10 12:30 PM by friendly_iconoclast
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Tyson
....In 1998, Tyson published an influential article in the Journal of American History, "Robert F. Williams, 'Black Power,' and the Roots of the Black Freedom Struggle." The following year, his Radio Free Dixie: Robert F. Williams and the Roots of Black Power, published by UNC Press, won the Frederick Jackson Turner Prize for best first book in U.S. history from the Organization of American Historians, as well as the James A. Rawley Prize for best book on the subject of race. "Radio Free Dixie" provided the foundation for "Negroes with Guns: Rob Williams and Black Power", a documentary film made by Sandra Dickson and Churchill Roberts at the University of Florida's Documentary Institute and broadcast on national television in February 2007. "Negroes with Guns," for which Tyson served as lead consultant, won the Erick Barnouw Award for best historical film from the Organization of American Historians....
An interview with Robert F. Williams:
Another interview with Williams:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5457524655277645843#
You can buy the DVD of "Negroes with Guns: Rob Williams and Black Power" here:
http://newsreel.org/nav/title.asp?tc=CN0178
....In 1998, Tyson published an influential article in the Journal of American History, "Robert F. Williams, 'Black Power,' and the Roots of the Black Freedom Struggle." The following year, his Radio Free Dixie: Robert F. Williams and the Roots of Black Power, published by UNC Press, won the Frederick Jackson Turner Prize for best first book in U.S. history from the Organization of American Historians, as well as the James A. Rawley Prize for best book on the subject of race. "Radio Free Dixie" provided the foundation for "Negroes with Guns: Rob Williams and Black Power", a documentary film made by Sandra Dickson and Churchill Roberts at the University of Florida's Documentary Institute and broadcast on national television in February 2007. "Negroes with Guns," for which Tyson served as lead consultant, won the Erick Barnouw Award for best historical film from the Organization of American Historians....
An interview with Robert F. Williams:
Another interview with Williams:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5457524655277645843#
You can buy the DVD of "Negroes with Guns: Rob Williams and Black Power" here:
http://newsreel.org/nav/title.asp?tc=CN0178


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=331645&mesg_id=331645
Remembering Robert Hicks and the Deacons of Defense
http://www.thesouthernshift.com/news/2010/04/remembering-robert-hicks-and-deacons-defense
Remembering Robert Hicks and the Deacons of Defense
Submitted by Southern Shift on Mon, 2010-04-26 11:32
The story around Robert Hicks and his group Deacons for Defense have all but been erased from public consciousness. You check on familiar touch points like YouTube and there's nothing there. Pictures are hard to find and articles are scant. The thought of armed Black men standing up to the KKK and successfully protecting lives and propert during the harsh days of the Jim Crow South is a scary thought for many. The truth of the matter is many African Americans did not sit back and just allow themselves to be beaten and terrorized by the KKK. Hicks represented an underplayed part of our history..
The passing of Robert Hicks will not be acknowledge on the same scale as the passing of Guru, Dr Dorothy Height and Benjamin Hooks but he is no less important. We tip our hat because he did what many have come to belive was the unthinkable.We also encourage folks to try and pick up a copy of the movie that stars Forest Whitaker
-Davey D-
Submitted by Southern Shift on Mon, 2010-04-26 11:32
The story around Robert Hicks and his group Deacons for Defense have all but been erased from public consciousness. You check on familiar touch points like YouTube and there's nothing there. Pictures are hard to find and articles are scant. The thought of armed Black men standing up to the KKK and successfully protecting lives and propert during the harsh days of the Jim Crow South is a scary thought for many. The truth of the matter is many African Americans did not sit back and just allow themselves to be beaten and terrorized by the KKK. Hicks represented an underplayed part of our history..
The passing of Robert Hicks will not be acknowledge on the same scale as the passing of Guru, Dr Dorothy Height and Benjamin Hooks but he is no less important. We tip our hat because he did what many have come to belive was the unthinkable.We also encourage folks to try and pick up a copy of the movie that stars Forest Whitaker
-Davey D-
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/us/25hicks.html?scp=1&sq=robert%20hicks&st=cse
Robert Hicks, Leader in Armed Rights Group, Dies at 81
Someone had called to say the Ku Klux Klan was coming to bomb Robert Hickss house. The police said there was nothing they could do. It was the night of Feb. 1, 1965, in Bogalusa, La.
The Klan was furious that Mr. Hicks, a black paper mill worker, was putting up two white civil rights workers in his home. It was just six months after three young civil rights workers had been murdered in Philadelphia, Miss.
Mr. Hicks and his wife, Valeria, made some phone calls. They found neighbors to take in their children, and they reached out to friends for protection. Soon, armed black men materialized. Nothing happened.
Less than three weeks later, the leaders of a secretive, paramilitary organization of blacks called the Deacons for Defense and Justice visited Bogalusa. It had been formed in Jonesboro, La., in 1964 mainly to protect unarmed civil rights demonstrators from the Klan. After listening to the Deacons, Mr. Hicks took the lead in forming a Bogalusa chapter, recruiting many of the men who had gone to his house to protect his family and guests....
The Klan was furious that Mr. Hicks, a black paper mill worker, was putting up two white civil rights workers in his home. It was just six months after three young civil rights workers had been murdered in Philadelphia, Miss.
Mr. Hicks and his wife, Valeria, made some phone calls. They found neighbors to take in their children, and they reached out to friends for protection. Soon, armed black men materialized. Nothing happened.
Less than three weeks later, the leaders of a secretive, paramilitary organization of blacks called the Deacons for Defense and Justice visited Bogalusa. It had been formed in Jonesboro, La., in 1964 mainly to protect unarmed civil rights demonstrators from the Klan. After listening to the Deacons, Mr. Hicks took the lead in forming a Bogalusa chapter, recruiting many of the men who had gone to his house to protect his family and guests....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deacons_for_Defense_and_Justice
Deacons for Defense and Justice
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Deacons for Defense and Justice is an armed self defense African American civil rights organization in the U.S. Southern states during the 1960s. Historically, the organization practiced self-defense methods in the face of racist oppression that was carried out by Jim Crow Laws; local and state agencies; and the Ku Klux Klan. Many times the Deacons are not written about or cited when speaking of the Civil Rights Movement because their agenda of self-defense, in this case, using violence (if necessary) did not fit the image of strict non-violence agenda that leaders like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. preached about the Civil Rights Movement. Yet, there has been a recent debate over the crucial role the Deacons and other lesser known militant organizations played on local levels throughout much of the rural South. Many times in these areas the Federal government did not always have complete control over to enforce such laws like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or Voting Rights Act of 1965.
The Deacons are a segment of the larger tradition of Black Power in the United States. This tradition began with the inception of African slavery in the U.S. and began with the use of Africans as chattel slaves in the Western Hemisphere. Stokely Carmichael defines Black Power as, The goal of black self-determination and black self-identityBlack Poweris full participation in the decision-making processes affecting the lives of black people, and recognition of the virtues in themselves as black people.[1] Those of us who advocate Black Power are quite clear in our own minds that a non-violent approach to civil rights is an approach black people cannot afford and a luxury white people do not deserve.[1] This refers to the idea that the traditional ideas and values of the Civil Rights Movement placated to the emotions and feelings of White liberal supporters rather than Black Americans who had to consistently live with the racism and other acts of violence that was shown towards them.
The Deacons were a driving force of Black Power that Stokely Carmichael echoed. Carmichael speaks about the Deacons when he writes, Here is a group which realized that the law and law enforcement agencies would not protect people, so they had to do it themselves...The Deacons and all other blacks who resort to self-defense represent a simple answer to a simple question: what man would not defend his family and home from attack?[1] The Deacons, according to Carmichael and many others were the protection that the Civil Rights needed on local levels, as well as, the ones who intervened in places that the state and federal government fell short.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Deacons for Defense and Justice is an armed self defense African American civil rights organization in the U.S. Southern states during the 1960s. Historically, the organization practiced self-defense methods in the face of racist oppression that was carried out by Jim Crow Laws; local and state agencies; and the Ku Klux Klan. Many times the Deacons are not written about or cited when speaking of the Civil Rights Movement because their agenda of self-defense, in this case, using violence (if necessary) did not fit the image of strict non-violence agenda that leaders like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. preached about the Civil Rights Movement. Yet, there has been a recent debate over the crucial role the Deacons and other lesser known militant organizations played on local levels throughout much of the rural South. Many times in these areas the Federal government did not always have complete control over to enforce such laws like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or Voting Rights Act of 1965.
The Deacons are a segment of the larger tradition of Black Power in the United States. This tradition began with the inception of African slavery in the U.S. and began with the use of Africans as chattel slaves in the Western Hemisphere. Stokely Carmichael defines Black Power as, The goal of black self-determination and black self-identityBlack Poweris full participation in the decision-making processes affecting the lives of black people, and recognition of the virtues in themselves as black people.[1] Those of us who advocate Black Power are quite clear in our own minds that a non-violent approach to civil rights is an approach black people cannot afford and a luxury white people do not deserve.[1] This refers to the idea that the traditional ideas and values of the Civil Rights Movement placated to the emotions and feelings of White liberal supporters rather than Black Americans who had to consistently live with the racism and other acts of violence that was shown towards them.
The Deacons were a driving force of Black Power that Stokely Carmichael echoed. Carmichael speaks about the Deacons when he writes, Here is a group which realized that the law and law enforcement agencies would not protect people, so they had to do it themselves...The Deacons and all other blacks who resort to self-defense represent a simple answer to a simple question: what man would not defend his family and home from attack?[1] The Deacons, according to Carmichael and many others were the protection that the Civil Rights needed on local levels, as well as, the ones who intervened in places that the state and federal government fell short.
Your research would be much easier if you actually donated and helped Democratic
Underground, which you have not done as yet
Of course, that's typical of gun prohibitionists as they are prone to extreme stinginess...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
342 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Play as you may, what Was the U.S. drop? Significant? Related to guns in any way?
Eleanors38
Apr 2016
#207
Gun control did not visibly change the trend of the curve of homicides in Australia
Albertoo
May 2016
#334
That US rate includes suicides....Australia's suicide rate is 12 per 100,000-not including murders.
EX500rider
Apr 2016
#256
America's suicide rate is 13 per 100,000 with approximately half by gun...
Human101948
May 2016
#259
If guns drove suicides rates then Japan's wouldn't be amoung the highest in the world.....
EX500rider
May 2016
#271
Please stop messing with other peoples fantasies, after all what would the Founders know about war?
Rex
Apr 2016
#234
I used to make the "individual rights" argument until someone educated me on people being plural.
ieoeja
Apr 2016
#45
You have to look to case law, not your friend, for the legal definition of "the people"
hack89
Apr 2016
#48
If you prefer to win an argument to seeking out the truth, then yes, you are absolutely correct. n/t
ieoeja
Apr 2016
#50
Just pointing out that your argument is not universally accepted so it is not "the truth"
hack89
Apr 2016
#51
In the Fourth "The people" "parcularly describes" "the persons." Sorry, individual.
Eleanors38
Apr 2016
#79
Even taking your friend's definition at face value no single instance of "the people"
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2016
#80
Yet those same framers went back to their respective states and protected an individual right?
X_Digger
Apr 2016
#192
Explain to me what part of the Second Amendment limits firearm ownership to militia members
TeddyR
Apr 2016
#47
You do not, in fact, know what they care about. You *believe* you know what they care about
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#173
Upthread you 'asssigned' feelings to an entire group of people, most of whom you've never met
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#175
how is the 2A responsible for all of that? as far as murders go, you'd need statistics on how many
dionysus
Apr 2016
#176
"our biggest problem, IMO, is that we are a sick people who resort to violence way too much."
Orrex
Apr 2016
#184
Nice try, but bullshit. Does that public ownership record list all the personal property inside...
Marengo
May 2016
#264
Oh, I noticed you forgot to post a detailed list of the personal possessions in your home...
Marengo
May 2016
#309
Your problem with heller is based on your misunderstanding of the bill of rights...
beevul
Apr 2016
#242
"our biggest problem, IMO, is that we are a sick people who resort to violence way too much."
EX500rider
Apr 2016
#238
i'd say humans in general. since we're the best joint on the block, i'd expect us to be less
dionysus
May 2016
#336
3/5th of person was a bad thing as well, but as the irrational might say of the constitution...
LanternWaste
Apr 2016
#78
I have hunted and owned guns for years and I'm sickened by the bloodshed caused by guns
Botany
Apr 2016
#15
Go on, admit it, you're just a gun-worshiper trying to push your religion on others. Period.
stone space
Apr 2016
#231
Go on, admit it, you're just a gun-grabber trying to push your religion on others. Period.
cleanhippie
Apr 2016
#232
Yet, every enforcement of gun control laws involves people carrying guns.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2016
#85
I'm obfuscating? suicide by gun, pill, rope or razor is exactly the same thing: suicide.
cleanhippie
Apr 2016
#128
Shit. My mistake. I didn't realize you were the arbiter of all that is liberal.
beevul
Apr 2016
#149
When, exactly, were *you* made zampolit here? Discussion at DU is up to the management...
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#178
I *could* call it "slacktivist culture warriors attempt to sling bullshit, and get called on it"
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#182
"You all are like... professionals or something?" CT? Really? That's a reach even for you lot
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#188
If I get drunk and mow down a bunch of kids in my car is the car responsible?
EX500rider
Apr 2016
#113
"A rope is not a gun" Yet if one commits suicide with that rope, you are just as dead
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#183
"Shift change?" More conspiracy theory? One's just as likely as the other...
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#219
"I'm going to be posting...some of her common sense solutions" Are they sensible and reasonable?
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#222
Less people have guns. The ones that do have guns have more of them. Multiple gun murders (especiall
MillennialDem
Apr 2016
#41
I think the true thing people are saying is that it's not the number of guns, but the gun ownership
MillennialDem
Apr 2016
#43
Your OP title is the precise contention that has been Hammerated, prima facie. nt
Eleanors38
Apr 2016
#84
Probably few. And few by knife. And few by beating. And few by club. And few by...
Eleanors38
Apr 2016
#92
I just don't see the Japanese killing 300,000 fellow citizens with machetes, as in Rwanda.
Eleanors38
Apr 2016
#101
Because the US *non-gun* murder rate is higher than Australia's entire murder rate, guns included
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#179
Do I consider the US being below the worldwide avg and median for murder good? yes.
EX500rider
Apr 2016
#249
Except we don't have 30k gun murders..under 9,000 in a country of over 300 million
EX500rider
May 2016
#258
"And is that homicide by gun?" Who cares? What difference does the method make to the victims...
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#247
From a country that just ordered new submarines from us, to deliver death from a distance.
jtuck004
Apr 2016
#12
Sous-marins français sont beaucoup mieux que les sous-marins américains n/t
Violet_Crumble
Apr 2016
#169
The number of individuals and households owning guns (at least per capita/percent) has been shrinkin
MillennialDem
Apr 2016
#44
This may not be true, as some states require citizens to register themselves...
Eleanors38
Apr 2016
#88
From November 2015: "Gun Ownership in (Massachusetts) Increases 66% since 2010"
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#185
Not only that, how many new FOID cards issued in Illinois in the last few years?
beevul
Apr 2016
#195
It's very important to their faith based POV, that Illinois be seen as an anomaly
DonP
Apr 2016
#213
I don't think we will. Things may change, they may not, but this is not Australia. n
jmg257
Apr 2016
#160
Yep. Can't underestimate the number of folks who feel safer with guns then they do without.
jmg257
Apr 2016
#168
"USA exporting Terror since 1960!" Not with *those* guns, it isn't.
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#220
Well of course it works, the nation decided to destroy the majority of their guns!
Rex
Apr 2016
#233
"(W)ash your hands...There is blood on them." Got your rhetoric from Pamela Geller, did you?
friendly_iconoclast
May 2016
#306
The end of it *does* say "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2016
#338
I'm sure you feel better after spouting that, but your logic is still faulty
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2016
#340
I see you're sticking with the demagoguery schtick, and adding misrepresentation (or ignorance)
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2016
#342
Fuck your Pamela Gellerish theory of collective guilt- same tune, different lyrics
friendly_iconoclast
May 2016
#290
Just as those who drink responsible have the blood of DUI victims on *their* hands, eh?
pablo_marmol
May 2016
#317
Uh, yes- you've blamed the >99% of gun owners that have never shot anyone and never will
friendly_iconoclast
May 2016
#330
*That* one should consider forming a duo with Pamela Geller, and releasing a single titled:
friendly_iconoclast
May 2016
#291
Blood which stains the hands may originate from many sources, not just guns...
Marengo
May 2016
#335
I disagree. We need to repeal restrictive gun laws, and continue making progress.
Kang Colby
May 2016
#268
Demand creates it's own supply. The Controllers haven't figured this out.......
pablo_marmol
May 2016
#318